Search results

In the article it mentions he didn't think about the $800 he earned in 15 minutes for performing the abortion. If he did 1,200 abortions, he made $960,000 (300 total hours of work).:eek: I wonder if he's going to donate all that blood money he made throughout the years.

Theoretically yes, there is a route to salvation for him. Now if we discuss the probability of him accepting the ultimate gift, I would say it's extremely unlikely. He repeatedly lied to the authorities in addition to accusing his wife of smothering their daughters. I might have increased the...

The US has had a hand in deciding which person would stay in power or replace someone who is already in power via force. To complain when Russia uses social media to promote Trump as "unfair" is sort of hypocritical in this context. As for Wikileaks dropping bombshell after bombshell on...

I'm not sure if you're intentionally deflecting people's points and instead focusing on your own political beliefs. The example I gave did mention Exxon and the EPA, but my point wasn't to discuss the merits and efficiency of the EPA. My point is that when someone or something has deep pockets...

Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, etc... they are all cable "news" shows. They are there for ratings first... not telling the news. Fox and CNN think having political pundits express/debate their opinion is journalism. Sorry, opinion pieces are not news... it isn't journalism. If you really want to watch...

A perfect example of wealthy people/corporations using their wealth unethically could be seen in my brother's profession. He went to school for a couple of years and got on as a plant operator for Exxon. They financially compensate people fresh out of school starting near 6-digits. While they...

You created a strawman argument from her original sarcastic post. She wasn't speaking of the world's rich/poor. In fact, she wasn't even necessarily saying the rich people in the US ought to hand over their money. She was speaking of American "rich people" who use their wealth in an unethical...

I mean yeah... He has admitted to doing this yet his die-hard supporters act shocked anyone would ever believe he'd do something like this. This doesn't mean Trump did do it, but the fact that it's not even a possibility to some is really sad...

Thomas Jefferson enslaved over 600 people and explicitly stated that Blacks were inferior.... yet he had children with at least one of his slaves. So to answer your question, yes, a racist would kiss someone they were racist against (or more than kiss for that matter).

I mean, one word to describe snowflakes would be "entitled". Would you disagree with that? There are sensitive Christians who are triggered and need a safe space from people with opposing beliefs that want to display something on public property next to the Christian displays. They think only...

This is true and Dude has even said as much. Nevertheless, their motive for doing what they are doing is irrelevant to the point that other groups have the same right that Chrsitians do. This point is being absolutely missed by many people here and I'm not sure why they are incapable of seeing it.

Snowflakes are offended when another religious group or anti-religious group wants to put up displays on public property. They have an entitlement mentality that only THEIR [religious] beliefs must be displayed and refuse to acknowledge that there are other people in this country who have...

The trouble with making a precedent based on "merit" is that it is non-quantifiable, it's rather subjective. While you might think MLK is worthy of it, maybe someone thinks a more deserving person should be put up instead. Truthfully, this is probably an extremely unpopular opinion, but I'm not...

On non-religious grounds. I don't have an answer for that other than what I don't want erected. Ultimately, I can stomach Christian displays but not anti-Christian/Islamic/any other religious display... For this reason, I can't be an entitled hypocritical American and say, "Only Jesus can be...

It doesn't. There is a clear precedent of a separation of church and state that the founding fathers envisioned. Christians point to the fact that they use the word "God" and automatically assume they are only referring to the Christian God. Sadly, many founding fathers were deists (not...

They are on record saying they would gladly take their displays down if the Christians took theirs down Right, it was too late to fix it by the time I was corrected the first time. Good eye.

Are people who believe that the US allowed Japan to attack us to gain support to enter WWII still called tin-foil conspiracists?

I would hope you celebrate Jesus Christ throughout the entire year and not just "at what is called Christmas". December 25th is the birthday of many pagan Gods. It's an incredibly sacred day to them. I think that is what Dude was saying.

Their pagan celebrations are irrelevant to me. If they refuse to allow someone in their house wearing a cross, I fully support them as it is their right. If Christians want religious displays on public property (I'm not in favor of that personally) then they cannot be hypocritical/pull a double...

I think you clearly didn't read what I wrote. Maybe it's your reading comprehension or a just a mistake? I said it's best if the state forbids any religion to display anything on public property. However, if the status quo is that Christians can do it, then all other religions (including the...