Last week I watched the new documentary about potential corruption in the 2020 election, produced by Dinesh D'souza, called "2000 Mules"; I want to see what other people think about what they saw in the documentary, and also increase awareness about this documentary's existence.
Summary: Cell phone "geotracking" data, video surveillance, and eyewitness testimony, all suggest the possibility that a large amount of "mail-in" ballots were fraudulently procured for the 2020 election.
Here's what I think:
1) This whole topic of election fraud is something that has to be approached with the highest objectivity. We have to account for our own biases when we watch something like this, and the biases of the producers of the documentary as well. Dinesh D'souza is obviously politically partisan; however, I think the organization that worked with Dinesh is less partisan, considering they have busted Republicans for election fraud before. The fact that "True the Vote" organization has done these kinds of investigations before and have had very meaningful results is compelling to me.
2) It's true that we "don't know" what votes were on the Mule-in ballots; but that doesn't matter. Regardless of who they were for, it still demonstrates that the election wasn't the bestest, most-safest, most-secure, incorruptible, decisive, pure and righteous election in the history of America and all of the universe; as the media would have us believe. It's an obvious national security issue that needs to be thoroughly investigated.
3) I think the evidence for the operation of "mules" during the 2020 election was extremely compelling:
- I know that there is a margin for error with geotracking technology... yet, it is often very accurate. No technology is perfect, but we can still look at the data, and consider the evidence for what it is.
- This geotracking data did not come from "Mailmen". I'm pretty sure there is no route for a single mail-carrier that crosses multiple counties and zip codes. And it's very unlikely that a single city route would pass 10 or more ballot-boxes ( 5? Maybe.) AND DEFINITELY NOT AT 4 IN THE MORNING. It might be possible that some of the signals were employees of parcel delivery services; but it's clear from video footage that at least some of these signals were not from the UPS-man or the Fed-Ex man. They supposedly have the identities of these people that participated in this. If they have the identities of these people, it should be relatively easy to determine who has legitimate business in "logistics" and take that into consideration.
4) I could definitely see "non-profits" participating in this scam. Non-profits like Planned parenthood depend on liberal government to stay in operation. It's not just them, though- there are churches that aren't afraid to cross lines they aren't supposed to cross. I could even see some doing this out of fear of their religious liberties being threatened, or something like that. People that participate in non-profits tend to BELIEVE in their causes very strongly- and sometimes that means they are willing to compromise their personal integrity for that cause. I don't say that in a judgmental way, that's just the way it is.
5) I wish the movie was presented with more hard evidence- the specific non-profits went completely unidentified... that's the big one. I don't know why they didn't identify the non-profits suspected of participating in this. The movie should have went farther than "we have some geotracking, and this is what it looks like". The evidence is good... but the movie adds a lot of FLUFF, where more presentation of evidence would have been better.
TLDR: Movie was compelling, but leaves me wanting more information. There needs to be further investigation.
Summary: Cell phone "geotracking" data, video surveillance, and eyewitness testimony, all suggest the possibility that a large amount of "mail-in" ballots were fraudulently procured for the 2020 election.
Here's what I think:
1) This whole topic of election fraud is something that has to be approached with the highest objectivity. We have to account for our own biases when we watch something like this, and the biases of the producers of the documentary as well. Dinesh D'souza is obviously politically partisan; however, I think the organization that worked with Dinesh is less partisan, considering they have busted Republicans for election fraud before. The fact that "True the Vote" organization has done these kinds of investigations before and have had very meaningful results is compelling to me.
2) It's true that we "don't know" what votes were on the Mule-in ballots; but that doesn't matter. Regardless of who they were for, it still demonstrates that the election wasn't the bestest, most-safest, most-secure, incorruptible, decisive, pure and righteous election in the history of America and all of the universe; as the media would have us believe. It's an obvious national security issue that needs to be thoroughly investigated.
3) I think the evidence for the operation of "mules" during the 2020 election was extremely compelling:
- I know that there is a margin for error with geotracking technology... yet, it is often very accurate. No technology is perfect, but we can still look at the data, and consider the evidence for what it is.
- This geotracking data did not come from "Mailmen". I'm pretty sure there is no route for a single mail-carrier that crosses multiple counties and zip codes. And it's very unlikely that a single city route would pass 10 or more ballot-boxes ( 5? Maybe.) AND DEFINITELY NOT AT 4 IN THE MORNING. It might be possible that some of the signals were employees of parcel delivery services; but it's clear from video footage that at least some of these signals were not from the UPS-man or the Fed-Ex man. They supposedly have the identities of these people that participated in this. If they have the identities of these people, it should be relatively easy to determine who has legitimate business in "logistics" and take that into consideration.
4) I could definitely see "non-profits" participating in this scam. Non-profits like Planned parenthood depend on liberal government to stay in operation. It's not just them, though- there are churches that aren't afraid to cross lines they aren't supposed to cross. I could even see some doing this out of fear of their religious liberties being threatened, or something like that. People that participate in non-profits tend to BELIEVE in their causes very strongly- and sometimes that means they are willing to compromise their personal integrity for that cause. I don't say that in a judgmental way, that's just the way it is.
5) I wish the movie was presented with more hard evidence- the specific non-profits went completely unidentified... that's the big one. I don't know why they didn't identify the non-profits suspected of participating in this. The movie should have went farther than "we have some geotracking, and this is what it looks like". The evidence is good... but the movie adds a lot of FLUFF, where more presentation of evidence would have been better.
TLDR: Movie was compelling, but leaves me wanting more information. There needs to be further investigation.
-
1
-
1
-
1
- Show all
