A Case for Not Reading The Bible Literally

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

biblestudent78

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2025
842
275
63
Richmond Texas
Too often congregants are required to read the bible literally, at least in all the “places that count.” Often this requirement is the fundamental means of “group faith” indoctrination, protection and border policing. Each denomination, creed, statement of faith and catechism is based on a “unique and literal” methodology of reading the Bible where it supports the groups predetermined and unique “faith” i.e. Dogmas. This is not reading the Bible literally. It is reading the Bible conformationally.

There are between 200 – 1,500 separate Christian religions in North America. All require that their unique brand of literal reading of the Bible “proof text” supports their belief that they alone legitimately understand of the Bible. Thus, taking the Bible literally is failing to take the Bible seriously. Reading it literally and seriously are two different things.

The very nature of the Bible’s comprehensive literary genres making literal reading a barrier to Biblical value.

• Historical Narrative: Stories and records of past events, making up more than half of the Bible (e.g., Genesis through Esther, and Acts). All are written through ancient human eyes.

• Poetry: Creative, imagery-rich writing that expresses human emotion (e.g., Psalms and Song of Solomon).

• Law (Covenant Law): Legal codes and religious rules given to ancient Israel (e.g., parts of Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy).

• Wisdom Literature: Practical advice and principles for everyday life (e.g., Proverbs and Ecclesiastes).

• Prophecy: Messages, warnings, and visions delivered from God through a prophet (e.g., Isaiah Jeremiah and the minor prophets).

• Gospels: Unique biographical narratives focusing on the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John).

• Epistles (Letters): Correspondence written by apostles to early churches or individuals to provide doctrine and instruction to the people of his time about the issues of his time.

• Apocalyptic Literature: Highly symbolic and visionary writings regarding the struggles against evil forces and future restoration (e.g., Revelation and parts of Daniel).

• Parables: Short stories or analogies used to teach a spiritual or moral lesson, common in Jesus' ministry.

These various literary genres each take a serious approach but not necessarily a literal approach. Each must be understood differently. When in Psalms it says "Then shall all the trees of the wood sing for joy" before the Lord. Then later, “Let the rivers clap their hands; let the hills sing for joy together." To read this literally, you would have to believe that trees can sing and rivers have hands. Jesus said, “I am the vine…” but we do not expect grapes from Jesus.

It is very strange that those who demand a literal meaning of every word in the New Testament also work very hard to deny something they don’t like is true. In Matthew, Mark and Luke Jesus encounters a religiously righteous young man who passes Jesus’s test of being “righteous” but fails when Jesus tells him he must sell everything he has, give it to the poor and follow him. The young man goes away sorrowful because he was rich. Today millions of Christians believe their faith will make them rich, if they give what they have to the church…Large Christian churches have multi-million-dollar annual budgets which provides little money for the needy in their community.

Reading the Bible seriously means we must turn off our filters, assumptions and ancient doctrines. It has been my experience in reading and rereading the bible, that if I do not find discomfort, exposure and humility in every book, I may be slipping into confirmation
 
If it is not literal but symbolic it still has a meaning and describing something in terms that give you an even more of a picture of what the literal description is.

It really is a literal meaning being more descriptive to describe it better.

There should not be a problem with understanding it.

If you read the Bible you should be able to understand it.

There is no symbolic interpretation but literal thou shalt not steal and literal symbolic like the beast has 7 heads which means 7 kingdoms throughout history that the devil influenced which is why the beast is of the 7.

It is all literal to me.

What the Bible says the beast has 7 heads and I am going to not understand it or whatever in the Bible.

I will know when it is literal or literal symbolic.

But some people might take it literal thinking that a beast will appear with 7 heads bobbing all over the place putting Ghidorah the 3 headed monster to shame that would cause Godzilla to think I want no part of that.

Sure Godzilla can take on 3 heads maybe 4 heads but 7 heads is out of his league.

So the 7 headed beast thing might frighten Godzilla and he will deny the Bible is true because the fear would be too much for him.

Which because of these types of descriptive terms some people say the Bible is not true and fantasy.
 
Too often congregants are required to read the bible literally, at least in all the “places that count.” Often this requirement is the fundamental means of “group faith” indoctrination, protection and border policing ... There are between 200 – 1,500 separate Christian religions in North America. All require that their unique brand of literal reading of the Bible “proof text” supports their belief that they alone legitimately understand of the Bible.
Hello Bible Student78, I've never seen or heard of such a "requirement" (before I read your OP today, that is). So, please link us to some examples of these requirements (that are found in all of our denominations and/or churches) so that we can,

1. see what you're talking about and then,​
2. compare/contrast the "unique brands" of literal Bible reading from our various churches and/or denominations.​

Thanks :)

God bless you!!

~Deuteronomy
 
Last edited:
Too often congregants are required to read the bible literally, at least in all the “places that count.” Often this requirement is the fundamental means of “group faith” indoctrination, protection and border policing. Each denomination, creed, statement of faith and catechism is based on a “unique and literal” methodology of reading the Bible where it supports the groups predetermined and unique “faith” i.e. Dogmas. This is not reading the Bible literally. It is reading the Bible conformationally.

There are between 200 – 1,500 separate Christian religions in North America. All require that their unique brand of literal reading of the Bible “proof text” supports their belief that they alone legitimately understand of the Bible. Thus, taking the Bible literally is failing to take the Bible seriously. Reading it literally and seriously are two different things.

The very nature of the Bible’s comprehensive literary genres making literal reading a barrier to Biblical value.

• Historical Narrative: Stories and records of past events, making up more than half of the Bible (e.g., Genesis through Esther, and Acts). All are written through ancient human eyes.

• Poetry: Creative, imagery-rich writing that expresses human emotion (e.g., Psalms and Song of Solomon).

• Law (Covenant Law): Legal codes and religious rules given to ancient Israel (e.g., parts of Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy).

• Wisdom Literature: Practical advice and principles for everyday life (e.g., Proverbs and Ecclesiastes).

• Prophecy: Messages, warnings, and visions delivered from God through a prophet (e.g., Isaiah Jeremiah and the minor prophets).

• Gospels: Unique biographical narratives focusing on the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John).

• Epistles (Letters): Correspondence written by apostles to early churches or individuals to provide doctrine and instruction to the people of his time about the issues of his time.

• Apocalyptic Literature: Highly symbolic and visionary writings regarding the struggles against evil forces and future restoration (e.g., Revelation and parts of Daniel).

• Parables: Short stories or analogies used to teach a spiritual or moral lesson, common in Jesus' ministry.

These various literary genres each take a serious approach but not necessarily a literal approach. Each must be understood differently. When in Psalms it says "Then shall all the trees of the wood sing for joy" before the Lord. Then later, “Let the rivers clap their hands; let the hills sing for joy together." To read this literally, you would have to believe that trees can sing and rivers have hands. Jesus said, “I am the vine…” but we do not expect grapes from Jesus.

It is very strange that those who demand a literal meaning of every word in the New Testament also work very hard to deny something they don’t like is true. In Matthew, Mark and Luke Jesus encounters a religiously righteous young man who passes Jesus’s test of being “righteous” but fails when Jesus tells him he must sell everything he has, give it to the poor and follow him. The young man goes away sorrowful because he was rich. Today millions of Christians believe their faith will make them rich, if they give what they have to the church…Large Christian churches have multi-million-dollar annual budgets which provides little money for the needy in their community.

Reading the Bible seriously means we must turn off our filters, assumptions and ancient doctrines. It has been my experience in reading and rereading the bible, that if I do not find discomfort, exposure and humility in every book, I may be slipping into confirmation
I see nothing wrong with reading the bible literally.
Taking it word for word exactly what it says.

The problem with so many different denominations is redefining the texts to mean something they do not say.
I would add taking verses out of context, adding in words the verses (and the context) do not say and ignoring some obvious texts that go against those redefined verses.

If there seems to be a contradiction between different verses, or conflict, keep in mind this is God's Word.
The problem actually lies in our own understanding of one or more of those verses.

Naturally, if something is meant to be figurative, proverbial, symbolic (such as many prophecies) then they should be treated as symbolic in meaning and let the bible interpret what those symbols mean.

Of course many things in scripture are literal and (unless otherwise indicated) should be treated as literal in meaning.
Taking an obvious symbolic prophecy and interpreting it as though those symbols are literal in meaning is a mistake.
Same thing goes for literal accounts that are not symbolic in nature. Putting a symbolic meaning on them and then embellishing the text to make it mean something you want it to say, is a mistake.