A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
In the Shadow of the Moon - Documentary

[video=youtube;f-ditEyvRbM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-ditEyvRbM[/video]
 
Science proves that NASA faked the moon landings - Moon landing Hoax

[video=youtube;q7pzg9xpAOE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7pzg9xpAOE[/video]
 
Anyone have updates on the China moon landing hoax? I'm looking forward to seeing the (hi-res!) pictures for this one. :)

I'm not sure what the globalists will do if people don't fall for this. They'll have to stage a terrorist moon-landing or something, just to prove that the US and China moon landings were legit.

The stories get funnier as the lies build up. :)
 
Astronauts Gone Wild

[video=youtube;weFpGufxq0I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weFpGufxq0I[/video]

[Mitchell's Son]

49m "Want to call the CIA and have them waxed?"
 
Mars Realized?

[video=youtube;1WhZnyWPWlk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WhZnyWPWlk[/video]

Uploaded on Feb 14, 2011
Almost nine months of isolation, training and preparation have finally paid off. Two Cosmonauts have stepped out onto the Red Planet for the first time. Mars 500 may be a simulated mission, with the planet's surface recreated in the Moscow region, but the 'space walk' is monitored by Russia's real mission control.

Faking Marswalk: Spacemen 'explore' Red Planet - YouTube

Uploaded on Feb 18, 2011
Two astronauts have carried out their second walk on a virtual surface of Mars. It's part of a unique project simulating an 18 month mission to the Red Planet. Rene Picshel from the European Space Agency gives us the details of the project...
 
The Proof Is In The Pudding?

[video=youtube;PxH0EUbmV_o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxH0EUbmV_o[/video]


The Moon is a Spacecraft - War Is Crime


Our Mystic Moon


"In 1969 the crew of Apollo Twelve, in an attempt to create an artificial moonquake sent the ascent stage of the lunar module crashing back down to the moon’s surface. To everyone’s surprise the highly sensitive seismic equipment recorded something totally unexpected.

For more than one hour, the moon continued to reverberate like a bell. Dr Frank Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) commented,

“None of us have seen anything like this on Earth. In all our experience, it is quite an extraordinary event. That this rather small impact ... produced a signal which lasted thirty minutes is quite beyond the range of our experience”.
( Marrs, p.6).

​

When Apollo Thirteen’s third stage was deliberately sent hurtling into the lunar surface by radio signal, crashing with the impact of eleven tons of TNT, NASA claimed that the moon, “reacted like a gong.” Seismic equipment as distant as one hundred and seventy-three kilometers from the crash site recorded reverberations lasting for three hours and twenty minutes and travelling to a depth of thirty-five to forty kilometers."




Urban Dictionary: The proof is in the pudding
 
Moon Truth?

[video=youtube;960vBSKT-Pw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=960vBSKT-Pw[/video]

"A conspiracy theory viral that sparked 3,000 calls to NASA, most of them along the lines of "See - we knew the moonlanding was faked." We made this as a joke, and it was written and directed by a guy called Adam Stewart who tragically died about 1 year later. He directed Headrush and Gift as well."


Moontruth.com - RationalWiki
 
10

[video=youtube;X-61n1-g35Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-61n1-g35Y[/video]

"Since the Apollo 11 mission, 10 Apollo personnel have died in freak accidents, including crashes, collisions, and fires..."


APOLLO MOON HOAX: Why Does Gus Grissom's Family Believe He Was Murdered?


Apollo Astronaut Was Murdered, Son Charges - Conspiracies & Secret Societies - Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums

"Apollo Astronaut Was Murdered, Son Charges

Christopher Ruddy
February 11, 1999 (old news but still very interesting)

Virgil I. "Gus” Grissom, the astronaut slated to be the first man to walk on the moon, was murdered, his son has charged in the Feb. 16 edition of Star magazine.
In another stunning development, a lead NASA investigator has charged that the agency engaged in a cover-up of the true cause of the catastrophe that killed Grissom and two other astronauts.

The tabloid exclusive by Steve Herz reports that Scott Grissom, 48, has gone public with the family’s long-held belief that their father was purposefully killed during Apollo I.

The Jan. 27, 1967, Apollo I mission was a simulated launch in preparation for an actual lunar flight.

NASA concluded that the Apollo I deaths of Grissom, as well as astronauts Edward H. White and Roger Chafee, were the result of an explosive fire that burst from the pure oxygen atmosphere of the space capsule. NASA investigators could not identify what caused the spark, but wrote the catastrophe off as an accident.

"My father’s death was no accident. He was murdered,” Grissom, a commercial pilot, told Star.

Grissom said he recently was granted access to the charred capsule and discovered a "fabricated” metal plate located behind a control panel switch. The switch controlled the capsules’ electrical power source from an outside source to the ship’s batteries. Grissom argues that the placement of the metal plate was an act of sabotage. When one of the astronauts toggled the switch to transfer power to the ship’s batteries, a spark was created that ignited a fireball.

Clark Mac Donald, a McDonnell-Douglas engineer hired by NASA to investigate the fire, offered corroborating evidence. Breaking more than three decades of silence, Mac Donald says he determined that an electrical short caused by the changeover to battery power had sparked the fire.

He says that NASA destroyed his report and interview tapes in an effort to stem public criticism of the space program.

"I have agonized for 31 years about revealing the truth, but I didn’t want to hurt NASA’s image or cause trouble,” Mac Donald told the paper. "But I can’t let one more day go by without the truth being known.”

Grissom’s widow, Betty, now 71, told Star she agrees with her son’s claim that her husband had been murdered.

"I believe Scott has found the key piece of evidence to prove NASA knew all along what really happened but covered up to protect funding for the race to the moon.”

Scott Grissom told Star that the motive for his father’s killing may have been related to NASA’s desire not have his father be the first man to walk on the moon because of criticism leveled at Grissom in 1961 after his Mercury capsule, Liberty 7, sunk in the Atlantic.

Critics of Grissom, including novelist Tom Wolfe, have claimed the astronaut panicked when his space capsule landed in the ocean, and he prematurely pulled an explosive charge to open the ship’s hatch, causing it to sink.

Fellow astronauts, however, gave Grissom the benefit of the doubt for several reasons. Grissom was a decorated Korean War pilot who had flown nearly 100 combat missions. He was a courageous man not known to panic.

There was also evidence that the explosive device on the hatch could accidentally blow without being pulled -- a fact that led NASA to remove such devices from future spacecraft.

Also, had Grissom pulled the explosive release on the hatch, his hand or arm should have had powder and bruise marks. Neither were found.

Grissom, one of the original Mercury seven, was the senior astronaut when the Apollo missions began.

Among the astronauts, Grissom was the most critical of the problem-plagued Apollo program, and the main Apollo contractor, North American Aviation.

Shortly before his death, Grissom had taken a large lemon and hung it around the space capsule as the press looked on. He had suggested publicly that the project could never be accomplished on time.

The Associated Press reported, "‘Pretty slim’ was the way [Grissom] put his Apollo’s chances of meeting its mission requirements.”

The Grissom family had reason to doubt the official NASA ruling from the beginning. Even before Apollo I, Grissom had received death threats which his family believed emanated from within the space program.

The threats were serious enough that he was put under Secret Service protection and had been moved from his home to a secure safehouse.

According to his wife, Grissom had warned her that "if there is ever a serious accident in the space program, it’s likely to be me.”

The Apollo I disaster led to a series of congressional hearings into the incident and NASA. During the hearings, one launch pad inspector, Thomas Baron, sharply criticized NASA's handling of the incident and testified that the astronauts attempted to escape the capsule earlier than officially claimed.

Baron was fired soon after giving the testimony, and died, along with his wife, when his car was struck by a train. Authorities ruled the deaths as suicide.

During the congressional hearings, Sen. Walter Mondale questioned the efficacy of manned space programs. Manned space flights were opposed by many of the leading space scientists at the time, including Drs. James Van Allen and Thomas Gold."
 
1969: A Space Odyssey?

[video=youtube;hlqvlu_di6A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlqvlu_di6A[/video]
 
1 Kilometer West or 4 Kilometers South?

[video=youtube;Gem10A4yt5w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gem10A4yt5w[/video]
 
Did not watch the long documentaries, but the short ones, other than the Star Trek sound trek were about 30 seconds expanded to 6 or more minutes. Really?

Why not just say you don't believe in moon landings? I personally watched the 1969 moon landings, and I know it would have been impossible to fake many aspects, including the USSR not finding out it was a fake, based on radio transmissions alone. I don't know about the rest of them.

I do think Arthur C. Clarke's book "Childhood's End" got it right. Make it to the moon, and no further, humanity loses its fervour to reach the stars.
 
YouTube videos can be tampered with, doctored or created to reflect anything the video creator wants to prove or illustrate.
 
Last edited:
Why not just say you don't believe in moon landings? I personally watched the 1969 moon landings, and I know it would have been impossible to fake many aspects, including the USSR not finding out it was a fake, based on radio transmissions alone. I don't know about the rest of them.
Who is to say the top brass in the USSR don't know the moon landings were fake? Guss Grissom certainly had his doubts about NASA's capability to land on the moon (he being one who would certainly know), and look what happened to him. Why else for China's rush to land a probe on the moon, if not to give credence to the lie America had been there before, when many are beginning to realise the number and scope of the lies being told?

What people forget is that at the top levels, there are no such things as countries anymore. The leaders of the US, USSR, China etc. are all actors in an elaborate charade, and have been for some time. Globalisation happened some time ago, its now just a matter of letting the serfs know without getting them too upset. How else do you explain events like a Communist homosexual from Kenya becoming president of the (alleged) bastion of Capitalism?
 
Getting slightly off-topic, but for those who believe politicians are more than the puppets of those who control them, a Youtube video of the (pupported) leaders of two (alleged) independent countries (Australia and Canada), giving the same speech. Coincidence theorists will claim "coincidence", or some other elaborate theory to maintain their coincident world view. The simplest explanation is that in this case (as in every case that matters), politicians are no more than actors pushing the agenda of the puppeteers who control them.

WTF?? Canadian Prime Minister and Australian Prime Minister, Same Speech on Iraq - YouTube