Rom 4:1
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
This is the mainstay verse of Scripture, that OSAS Christians run to for faith alone justification. But as with all false doctrine, it's only run by false reading of Scripture taken out of context. In this case, it dismisses context both locally in Romans 4, and generally with James 2.
First the general context:
James{2:21}
Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only…
Without breaking Scripture, we know that Abraham was justified by works. Since it's not a matter of if Abraham was justified by works, then it was only a matter of when.
When was Abraham not justified by works in Rom 4? When Abraham believed God for a promised son, Isaac.
Gen 15:4
And, behold, the word of the LORD came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir...And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
When was Abraham justified by works in James 2, only when Abraham offered up his promised son Isaac.
And so, we see that in Rom 4 Abraham was not justified by his works at that time, but in James 2 was justified by works at that time.
Now the local context:
Rom 4:1
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
The works of Abraham that did not justify him, was works pertaining to the flesh, not pertaining to any works at all. In James 2, we see only the works of faith after the Spirit are justified by God:
Heb 11:17
By faith Abraham, when he was tried, and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son, Of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called: Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure.
Gal 4:28
Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
Conclusion: By dismissing general and local context of Scripture, false doctrine is by corrupting the rule of exclusionary context: Partial exclusion is wrongly inflated to complete exclusion.
In Rom 4, the exclusion of some works in Abraham's life at that time, is falsely used to excluded all works in his life at that later time in James 2.
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
This is the mainstay verse of Scripture, that OSAS Christians run to for faith alone justification. But as with all false doctrine, it's only run by false reading of Scripture taken out of context. In this case, it dismisses context both locally in Romans 4, and generally with James 2.
First the general context:
James{2:21}
Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only…
Without breaking Scripture, we know that Abraham was justified by works. Since it's not a matter of if Abraham was justified by works, then it was only a matter of when.
When was Abraham not justified by works in Rom 4? When Abraham believed God for a promised son, Isaac.
Gen 15:4
And, behold, the word of the LORD came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir...And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
When was Abraham justified by works in James 2, only when Abraham offered up his promised son Isaac.
And so, we see that in Rom 4 Abraham was not justified by his works at that time, but in James 2 was justified by works at that time.
Now the local context:
Rom 4:1
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
The works of Abraham that did not justify him, was works pertaining to the flesh, not pertaining to any works at all. In James 2, we see only the works of faith after the Spirit are justified by God:
Heb 11:17
By faith Abraham, when he was tried, and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son, Of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called: Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure.
Gal 4:28
Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
Conclusion: By dismissing general and local context of Scripture, false doctrine is by corrupting the rule of exclusionary context: Partial exclusion is wrongly inflated to complete exclusion.
In Rom 4, the exclusion of some works in Abraham's life at that time, is falsely used to excluded all works in his life at that later time in James 2.