Getting a vaccine is irrelevant to life returning to normal. Life will return to normal without it.
That very statement you made is textbook propaganda known as a red herring.
ALERT: THE VACCINE MIGHT BE THE MARK OF THE BEAST
- Thread starter saintrose
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
Getting a vaccine is irrelevant to life returning to normal. Life will return to normal without it.
That very statement you made is textbook propaganda known as a red herring.
You first said vaccines originated in the sixties. That was obviously wrong.
Excuse me for thinking the real facts informed you as to the truth of the situation.
Since that ^ is blatantly false... Vaccines go back hundreds of years.
I thought it was the 1960s, could have been a different decade.
Does it make a moral difference to you when vaccines developed from murdered babies entered the scene and became the gold standard for all vaccines that came after?
Just sounds like a bunch of whataboutism and hair splitting.
There are more important points at stake here.
Edit: check my sourced post on the previous page:
"Fibroblast cells are the cells needed to hold skin and other connective tissue together. The fetal fibroblast cells used to grow vaccine viruses were first obtained from elective termination of two pregnancies in the early 1960s. These same fetal cells obtained from the early 1960s have continued to grow in the laboratory and are used to make vaccines today. No further sources of fetal cells are needed to make these vaccines."
G
Godsgirl83
Guest
Nor are people who scare people INTO takeing vaccines.
S
Scribe
Guest
Not hundreds. They really got started in the 1920s. And full swing in the 40s.
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...brief-history-of-vaccines-and-vaccination.pdf
It is backed up by all the references citied in square brackets. So it was a thorough study.
Edward Jenner’s innovations, begun with his successful 1796 use of cowpox material to create immunity to smallpox, quickly made the practice widespread. His method underwent medical and technological changes over the next 200 years, and eventually resulted in the eradication of smallpox. From post #2810
S
Scribe
Guest
Technically you do not have the vaccine in your system. You have antibodies created by your own immune system when it was boosted to create them after exposure to the vaccine dosage which was then eliminated. There is no trace of that vaccine still in your system.If vaccine is Mark of the beast...that scares me...because I have hepatitis B vaccine in my system
And don't be scared. Read Rev 13 and you will know that you have not received the mark of the beast and it is not something anyone can receive by accident.
S
SophieT
Guest
S
SophieT
Guest
oddly enough no one demanded that i renounce my faith or bow before an image of the beast when i received it, so i think the OP premise is **possibly** flawed, a little bit?
that little nugget has been pretty much discounted
- Status