Amillennial theology is in error - (no literal thousand year reign)

  • Thread starter Thread starter BradC
  • Start date Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
John 18:36 "Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence".

Jesus never promised a literal earthly kingdom.

No. He did not. But the OT prophets did.. I guess we should just ignore them
 
Are you admitting that there is an Israel and a people that exist outside of the church who are in unbelief?

There is a people that are "of Israel" outside the church. That is, they are physical descendants of Israel but have no part in the promises of God, as they are lost in unbelief.
 
There is a people that are "of Israel" outside the church. That is, they are physical descendants of Israel but have no part in the promises of God, as they are lost in unbelief.

yet according to Rom 11.

1. They are still beloved, even though they are our enemy
2. They will all be saved one day, as God removed their blindness and cleanses them.

 
yet according to Rom 11.

1. They are still beloved, even though they are our enemy
2. They will all be saved one day, as God removed their blindness and cleanses them.


I disagree with both points.

  1. The election is beloved through the promises made to the fathers. The unbelieving portion was never, and never will be, beloved of GOD.
  2. Paul spends three chapters (9-11) arguing his point that only a remnant is (ever) saved. It makes no sense that he would deviate from that to suddenly, and out of context, say that all will be saved. And there is nothing in the rest of scripture to support such an idea.
 
​why do the last few chapters of Ezekiel describe a temple?

Because a Temple will be built during the Millenium and yes, there will be Levitical priests there and they will offer sacrifices just as Ezekiel says they will.
 
Because a Temple will be built during the Millenium and yes, there will be Levitical priests there and they will offer sacrifices just as Ezekiel says they will.

What an abominable, blood thirsty god that would be to needlessly sacrifice animals as a memorial.
 
Haven't read Ezek 40 through 48 have you?

Of course I have... with understanding.

Do you read everything in the bible literally?

Then Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life in yourselves! John 6:53​
 
What an abominable, blood thirsty god that would be to needlessly sacrifice animals as a memorial.

Hmmm, interesting that you would call Jesus Christ bloodthirsty...

Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
Heb 10:3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.
 
I disagree with both points.

  1. The election is beloved through the promises made to the fathers. The unbelieving portion was never, and never will be, beloved of GOD.
hmm. thats funny

[SUP]28 [/SUP]Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers.

How can Paul say they are our enemy, but loved at the same time. Is Paul telling us to hold a standard God himself will not hold?
  1. Paul spends three chapters (9-11) arguing his point that only a remnant is (ever) saved. It makes no sense that he would deviate from that to suddenly, and out of context, say that all will be saved. And there is nothing in the rest of scripture to support such an idea.

Wrong.

Paul spends chapters 9 - 10 saying

1. that being a physical descendant does not give you an automatic in.
2. That God did not make a mistake Choosing Israel
3. That God chose this nation before anyone did evil or good (it was not based on human reasoning. it was based on Gods purpose

then he spend chapter 11 telling us gentile believers not to get puffed up in Pride. that yes Israel is blinded in part. but this is a temporary blindness. And there will come a time (when the time of th egentiles is fulfilled) that ALL Israel will be saved.
 
Because a Temple will be built during the Millenium and yes, there will be Levitical priests there and they will offer sacrifices just as Ezekiel says they will.

why would they be offering sacrifice when the lamb slain before the foundation of the world is ruling there? this makes no sense.
 
In a regular year, there were...


Time Bulls Rams Lambs Goats
Daily sacrifice 708
Sabbath sacrifice 96
New Moon 24 12 84 12
Passover Week 14 7 49 7
Feast of Pentecost 2 1 7 1
Feast of Trumpets 1 1 7 1
Day of Atonement 2 1 7 3

Tabernacles 71 15 105 8
[TR]
ANNUAL TOTAL: 114 37 1063 32 = 1246 animals.
[/TR]


commanded by the one who became Jesus Christ. In an intercalary year we must add...

New Moon: 2 Bulls 1 ram, 7 lambs and 1 goat
Daily Sacrifice: 60 lambs Sabbath sacrifices: 8 lambs 79 animals.

You may say what you will about the LORD (Jesus Christ) Who commanded these sacrifices, but there is no way I will say anything about what He commanded and what will be done in the future.
 
Hmmm, interesting that you would call Jesus Christ bloodthirsty...

Heb 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Heb 10:2 For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins.
Heb 10:3 But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.

The distinction being that those sacrifices were needed as a memorial to remind people of their sin debt before GOD until the perfect sacrifice would come. Once he came there was no need for bloody reminders of the penalty for sin.
 
I don’t want conjectures. Provide OT passages that state "earthly millennial reign of Christ". Thanks.

they have been stated over and over. it is not conjecture. ez 37 is just one of the many.
 
why would they be offering sacrifice when the lamb slain before the foundation of the world is ruling there? this makes no sense.

Unless you are ate up with the heresy called preterism, then you can read it for yourself...

Eze 43:18 And he said unto me, Son of man, thus saith the Lord GOD; These are the ordinances of the altar in the day when they shall make it, to offer burnt offerings thereon, and to sprinkle blood thereon.
Eze 43:19 And thou shalt give to the priests the Levites that be of the seed of Zadok, which approach unto me, to minister unto me, saith the Lord GOD, a young bullock for a sin offering.
Eze 43:20 And thou shalt take of the blood thereof, and put it on the four horns of it, and on the four corners of the settle, and upon the border round about: thus shalt thou cleanse and purge it.
Eze 43:21 Thou shalt take the bullock also of the sin offering, and he shall burn it in the appointed place of the house, without the sanctuary.
Eze 43:22 And on the second day thou shalt offer a kid of the goats without blemish for a sin offering; and they shall cleanse the altar, as they did cleanse it with the bullock.
Eze 43:23 When thou hast made an end of cleansing it, thou shalt offer a young bullock without blemish, and a ram out of the flock without blemish.
Eze 43:24 And thou shalt offer them before the LORD, and the priests shall cast salt upon them, and they shall offer them up for a burnt offering unto the LORD.
Eze 43:25 Seven days shalt thou prepare every day a goat for a sin offering: they shall also prepare a young bullock, and a ram out of the flock, without blemish.
Eze 43:26 Seven days shall they purge the altar and purify it; and they shall consecrate themselves.
Eze 43:27 And when these days are expired, it shall be, that upon the eighth day, and so forward, the priests shall make your burnt offerings upon the altar, and your peace offerings; and I will accept you, saith the Lord GOD.

Now remember this is the Temple built in Jersualem AFTER the return of Christ.
 
In a regular year, there were...



commanded by the one who became Jesus Christ. In an intercalary year we must add...

New Moon: 2 Bulls 1 ram, 7 lambs and 1 goat
Daily Sacrifice: 60 lambs Sabbath sacrifices: 8 lambs 79 animals.

You may say what you will about the LORD (Jesus Christ) Who commanded these sacrifices, but there is no way I will say anything about what He commanded and what will be done in the future.

you have a problem.

they were done until the true lamb came
they were a schoolmaster to lead us to christ.

christ came. thus the need for sacrifice has been done away with. never again will we need this.

God is not going to restor nature, where th elion and lamb sleep together, only to kill a bunch of lambs.