A
Ariel82
Guest
Amillennialism is closer to the mark, but fall short somewhat in my opinion.
Could you elaborate?
Amillennialism is closer to the mark, but fall short somewhat in my opinion.
What's complicated about believing ALL of the Bible and understanding that ALL must be fulfilled? God has an eternal plan for the Church and also an eternal plan for redeemed and restored Israel on earth (surrounded by saved nations).Seems to be the most complicated view...
What's complicated about believing ALL of the Bible and understanding that ALL must be fulfilled? God has an eternal plan for the Church and also an eternal plan for redeemed and restored Israel on earth (surrounded by saved nations).
Hmmm, I guess I am a pre trib (dispensational) premillenialist......who knew?
The system of interpretation of the book of Revelation which seems most satisfactory to me (though it is not without its difficulties) is that known as progressive parallelism, ably defended by William Hendriksen in More Than Conquerors, his commentary on Revelation.2 According to this view, the book of Revelation consists of seven sections which run parallel to each other, each of which depicts the church and the world from the time of Christ’s first coming to the time of his second. The first of these seven sections is found in chapters 1-3...
...........read more:
Originally Posted by Nehemiah6 : But that was not the end of the story. Israel went into Babylonian captivity (c 600 BC) and lost their land, and the remnant which returned later was under Gentile rule until AD 70, when all the Jews are driven out of Palestine. After 1948 the secular nation-state of Israel occupied only a fraction of Palestine, and today occupies about 1/10[SUP]th[/SUP] of the land promised under the Abrahamic Covenant. It is only AFTER the literal second coming of Christ to earth that the kingdom of Israel will be restored, and will occupy the land from the Nile to the Euphrates (as promised to Abraham).![]()
If it was only a question of a "different view", then we could say those are differences of opinion. When when LARGE SWATHES of Scripture are deliberately misinterpreted and/or ignored, that actually boils down to unbelief. God gave detailed covenants to Abraham (reiterated to Isaac and Jacob) as well as to David. Those covenants must either be taken as immutable or dismissed as non-binding. And the Amillennialists, Preterists and Replacement Theology proponents have done just that.So whenever somebody has a different view, its automatically "unbelief" in your eyes.
So, Jesus’ predictions were fulfilled. He did not fail, nor do we need to engage in theological gymnastics to try to explain-away the seeming delay or postponement of His return. It happened right on schedule. Many theologians know that the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD was important in God’s scheme of redemption, but never understood its full significance. It has to do with the consummation of the plan of redemption. The final events of the redemptive drama came to pass in the first century within the apostles’ generation (before A.D. 70). Christ’s kingdom is here now. Paradise has been restored in Christ (for our afterlife in heaven above). Christ has conquered all His enemies and has given us His Eternal Kingdom, “of the increase of which there shall be no end” (Isaiah 9:6-7).
The same could be said for yourself, for I don't know a single person who wouldn't benefit from more Bible study.
We should all seek to learn and accept the teaching of One Man: Christ Jesus.
Why do you believe in the Rapture and 1000 year reign with Jesus on Earth in glorified bodies?
skimmed some of your past posts and it appears to be your stance. you can correct me if its an inaccurate assessment of your beliefs.
if you were wrong and Ammillenialism is what Jesus taught, how would that change your outlook on the world and how you live?
I don't think so. There are several references in the New Testament to Judah as Israel. When Paul writes about Israel in Romans 9-11, he is in fact referring to those who lived in Judah and were called Israel (or Israelites).Nehemiah6, you are confusing Judah with Israel. from Israel.
Nehemiah6, you are confusing Judah with Israel. The Babylonian captivity was Judah only. The nation that today calls itself Israel has no right to that name, and they should know it. The last time it was used properly was in 722 BC, before Assyria carried the 10 Northern tribes away captive. I guess they figured the name was up for grabs (Satan's idea, I'm sure). God knows where they are even if they don't know themselves. He always separates Judah from Israel in prophecy.
You are totally right about God dealing with physical Israel differently than the spiritual Israel (the Church of Christ). Do not look at Judah occupying the mid-east as Israel's return. Go back and look at all the prophecy: being sure to separate Judah from Israel.![]()
If it was only a question of a "different view", then we could say those are differences of opinion. When when LARGE SWATHES of Scripture are deliberately misinterpreted and/or ignored, that actually boils down to unbelief. God gave detailed covenants to Abraham (reiterated to Isaac and Jacob) as well as to David. Those covenants must either be taken as immutable or dismissed as non-binding. And the Amillennialists, Preterists and Replacement Theology proponents have done just that.
Um, he didn't say Judah wasn't. But there was a reason the 12 tribes stopped being 12 along the way. Babylon took Judah. Not all of them.Judah is one of the twelve tribes that Jesus Christ "The Lion of the tribe of Judah". Please read your Bible...It has all the answers, the correct answers.
You will have a hard time finding "the eternal land the New Jerusalem" in the Bible.The eternal that speaks of the eternal land the New Jerusalem to begin with...
You will have a hard time finding "the eternal land the New Jerusalem" in the Bible.
1. It is a Heavenly city, not a land. The land of Israel will be on earth stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates.
2. It is 1500 miles long, 1500 miles wide, and 1500 miles high. A perfect cubic city which is as large as a continent. Thus it represents the Holy of Holies (which was also a cube), and is also the eternal dwelling place of God and of the Lamb.
3. It is a supernatural city which has been prepared by God for His saints. It is their eternal home and has mansions for all the saints. Their eternal imperishable inheritance is also in that city.
4. It has a wall with twelve foundations, therefore the city itself has twelve foundations, and the materials used in its construction are precious metals and precious stones (no doubt far better than anything seen on earth).
5. This city will descend from Heaven and remain as a celestial body over the earth, since the light of the New Jerusalem will give light to the earth and its nations.
6. Redeemed and restored Israel will be on earth eternally, and surrounded by saved nations.
You will find all of this in the Bible, but you will not find these things as "parables". Parables had a limited use and a limited application and it was primarily to hide spiritual truths from Christ's enemies. The Bible has a very small component of parables so I do not see how you and others start replacing prophecies with parables.
If what you are asking is whether there is a correspondence between the Olivet Discourse and the seven seals of Revelation, I would say that for the first five seals there is clearly a correspondence. Which means that the events and prophecies of seals 1 to 5 began to be fulfilled from the first century and have continued being fulfilled even to this date. The severity and frequency of earthquakes is a good example -- "...and earthquakes, in divers places..." (Mt 24:7).In light of what you say,,,in Revelation 5:9 did Jesus mention any of he things that were sealed in Matthew 24.Mark 13. Luke 21 ect.?
Since Revelation is prophetic, and God and Christ know the end from the beginning, Jesus was fully aware of what would be revealed to John after His resurrection and for the book of Revelation. However, He would not disclose anything prematurely, so He did not mention the seals in the Olivet Discourse. Indeed it was only AFTER His resurrection and AFTER the aposltes received the Holy Spirit that He opened all the OT Scriptures to them. But even that would have been too early to speak about the future prophecies given to John.Thats not what I am asking at all,,,In Revelation 5:9 He(Jesus) was found worthy to open the sealed scroll because he was "slain" (no one was found worthy to do so before then) so if he (Jesus) had not yet been "slain" at the discourse(Olivet) did he mention anything from the sealed scroll prior to him being slain and being found worthy to open it?