A
Ariel82
Guest
Where are Abraham, Moses, Jacob and David now?
Dead in the grave or in heaven?
Jesus tells us in the Bible.
Dead in the grave or in heaven?
Jesus tells us in the Bible.
Therefore, there is nothing in the context that would suggest that the thousand years is anything but a literal thousand year period. To apply a different meaning is to just completely ignore the plain meaning of scripture and that because of the teachings of men.
What I was pointing out is that Amillenilism claims that Christ is already reigning on the earth and that the Kingdom of God has already been established, while the 1,000 years is merely a figure of speech for this period.
Anyone good with English grammar and can clearly articulate the difference between Indicative and Subjunctive mood tenses?
Sorry about a car accident. Will keep you in prayer.
Thanks for the Greek grammar lesson.
The throne is in the heavens, David throne is where Christ is sitting now at the right hand of the Father:
Acts 2:30 And so, because he was a prophet and knew that GOD HAD SWORN TO HIM WITH AN OATH TO SEAT one OF HIS DESCENDANTS ON HIS THRONE,
Acts 2:34 “For it was not David who ascended into heaven, but he himself says:‘THE LORD SAID TO MY LORD, “SIT AT MY RIGHT HAND
When Christ ascended it was to sit on David's throne, a "spiritual" throne, not one based on the land.
What parable in Revelation 20? There are NO PARABLES in Revelation, and you will not even find that word in that book. Why do Christians invent fantasies when things are stated plainly? Let's look at the first ten verses and see if there is any parabolic or hidden meaning. And a literal understanding of Scriptural is the spiritual understanding of Scripture (unless there is a clear metaphor).Hi brother, if I could ask.What made you decide to look to the literal understanding of that parable found in Revelation 20 and not that which they signified as to the spiritual understanding hid from natural man? I am sure your friends as brother in Christ from the Amil camp have asked you.
Hi brother, if I could ask.What made you decide to look to the literal understanding of that parable found in Revelation 20 and not that which they signified as to the spiritual understanding hid from natural man? I am sure your friends as brother in Christ from the Amil camp have asked you.
It would appear to contradict the kind of hermeneutics necessary for understanding that parable . The Holy Spirit not only sent it but also signified it, giving us His understanding .
Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
What does the literal word "thousand" signify spiritually?
What does the literal word "thousand" signify spiritually?
I'm going to quote some things about the Greek. We don't call the "indicative" by that name in English, although we certainly have the subjective, [subjunctive - thanks but no thanks, spell check!] which is something that is a dependent clause, and can't stand alone. Indicative in English basically means it is stating facts. Subjective technically is stating possibilities, conjectures, "what if."
"Just like Greek nouns, the Greek verb also changes form (the Greek 'spelling', so to speak). The form changes based upon the subject of the verb and the kind of action indicated. As was mentioned earlier, Greek is a fully "inflected language." Each Greek word actually changes form (inflection) based upon the role that it plays in the sentence. The stem of the verb shows the basic meaning or action of the word, but the ending (or ‘suffix’) changes to show various details. Not only the ending of the verb may change, but the verb form may have a ‘prefix’ added to the beginning of the verbal stem. Sometimes the actual stem of the verb may change or may add an ‘infix’ to indicate certain other details."
The aspect of the grammatical "mood" of a verb has to do with the statement's relationship to reality. In broad terms, mood deals with the fact of whether the asserted statement is actual or if there is only the possibility of its actual occurrence. "Whether the verbal idea is objectively a fact or not is not the point: mood represents the way in which the matter is conceived" (Dana & Mantey). If the one asserting the sentence states it as actual, then the mood reflects this, regardless of whether the statement is true or false.
The indicative mood is the only mood conceived of as actual while with the other three moods (imperative, subjunctive, and optative) the action is only thought of as possible or potential.
Indicative Mood
The indicative mood is a statement of fact or an actual occurrence from the writer's or speaker's perspective. Even if the writer is lying, he may state the action as if it is a fact, and thus the verb would be in the indicative mood. It may be action occurring in past, present, or future time. This 'statement of fact' can even be made with a negative adverb modifying the verb (see the second example).
This is in contrast to one of the other moods (see below) in which the writer/speaker may desire or ask for the action to take place.
For example: "And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb."
Rev. 12:11 "God is not mocked." Gal. 6:7
Imperative Mood
The imperative mood is a command or instruction given to the hearer, charging the hearer to carry out or perform a certain action.
For example: "Flee youthful lusts." 2 Tim. 2:22
Subjunctive Mood
The subjunctive mood indicates probability or objective possibility. The action of the verb will possibly happen, depending on certain objective factors or circumstances. It is oftentimes used in conditional statements (i.e. 'If...then...' clauses) or in purpose clauses. However if the subjunctive mood is used in a purpose or result clause, then the action should not be thought of as a possible result, but should be viewed as a definite outcome that will happen as a result of another stated action.
For example: "Let us come forward to the Holy of Holies with a true heart in full assurance of faith." Heb 10:23
"In order that now the manifold wisdom of God might be made known through the church..." Eph 3:10
Optative Mood
The optative is the mood of possibility, removed even further than the subjunctive mood from something conceived of as actual. Often it is used to convey a wish or hope for a certain action to occur.
For example: "And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ." I Thess 5:23
Greek Verbs (Shorter Definitions)
We do have the imperative in English, commonly called the "command" tense. However, unlike Greek and German, or French and Spanish, there are not different, unique words for it in English. For example, if you want someone to stop now, you would just say "STOP!" The exclamation mark, the lack of a subject indicate imperative. Other languages are much more definitive in their verbs.
Same with subjunctive verbs. In Greek, the vowel is lengthened in the subjective, although the ending are similar to the Indicative mood. In English we tend to identify the subjunctive because of the relative pronoun or subordinate pronoun that starts the clause, and that it cannot stand alone.
"I went to the store, which I hoped was open."
"I went to the store," is the main or coordinate clause, and it can stand alone. It is a complete sentence or thought.
"which I hoped was open," is the subjunctive or dependent clause. It starts with a relative pronoun, and it is not complete. It cannot stand on its own.
Greek is very similar, except besides the relative pronoun, it has a verb in the subjunctive. Plus, because of the flexibility of Greek, it can appear in strange places. In English, the subordinate clause is usually, but not always, second. In Greek, there is never a doubt, because of the double identification of the clause with both the relative pronoun and the lengthened verb indicating the subordinate.
Of course, English can be difficult for some to identify the subordinate clause. I always remember my grade 7 English teacher teaching subordinate clauses for literally months. After a few weeks of getting 100% on every daily quiz on this topic, my best friend and I got permission to go to the library and do some research projects. That was very unusual in those days, for a teacher to let someone out of the instruction part of the class. But wisely, she knew we got the idea, and that we were bored to tears. Really, I never understood why the topic was so difficult, my friend and I got the first time it was explained. We just did a big section on subordinate clauses in German, which has some unique difficulties. I confess to relying on my knowledge of both Greek and English to figure out how to identify and use subordinate clauses auf Deutsch!
PS Sorry if this is a bit muddled. I am in a lot of pain because a truck hit me last week, and I can't think well.
So, I went to German today, and guess what we studied? The Indicative and Subjunctive moods in English and German. Plus the Imperative. Because I reviewed this, I had all the right answers.
So thanks Ariel! Nothing like picking up a few brownie points, while the rest of the class looks bored! LOL
Linear A and Linear B, linear forms of writing used by certain Aegean civilizations during the 2nd millennium BC.Linear A is attested in Crete and on some Aegean islands from approximately 1850 BC to 1400 BC. Its relation to the so-called hieroglyphic Minoan script is uncertain. It is a syllabic script written from left to right. The approximate phonetic values of most syllabic signs used in Linear A are known from Linear B, but the language written in Linear A remains unknown. It must have been a pre-Hellenic language of Minoan Crete. Its eventual relation with the Eteocretan language of the 1st millennium BC is also unknown.
Linear B is an adapted form of Linear A, which was borrowed from the Minoans by the Mycenaean Greeks, probably about 1600 BC. Its language is the Mycenaean Greek dialect. Linear B script is attested on clay tablets and on some vases, both dating from about 1400 BC to roughly 1200 BC. The script was exclusively used for the economic administration of the Mycenaean palaces, such as those at Knossos and Khaniá in Crete, and Mycenae, Pylos, Thebes, and Tiryns in continental Greece. Linear B’s 90 syllabic signs express open syllables (i.e., syllables ending in a vowel), generally beginning without a consonant or with only one consonant; because of this, the script is unable to represent groups of consonants or final consonants clearly. For instance, sperma ‘seed’ is spelled pe-ma, and stathmos ‘stable’ is spelled ta-to-mo.
The Linear B texts are extremely important for Greek linguistics. They represent the oldest known Greek dialect, elements of which survived in Homer’s language as a result of a long oral tradition of epic poetry. Linear B was deciphered as Greek in 1952 by Michael Ventris.
Garee! Why don't you come down off your fluffy spiritual cloud and read the word of God in the literal sense until a symbolic interpretation is required, instead of spiritualizing everything?
Your question above is a contradiction in terms! If it is the literal word "thousand" then it is literal, not spiritual! How about this for the meaning of a thousand years, 999 years plus 1 year, ergo, a thousand years. Was that so difficult?
How is it that you and others read the scripture which is consistent citing "a thousand years" six times within Rev.20:1 thru 7, but instead of believing what it literally says, you and others go looking around to try and figure out what a thousand years means. My gosh man! It's a thousand years!!! Just like the 144,000 is a literal 144,000. Let me put it this way, when you stand before the Lord you won't be able to say, "but Lord your word doesn't say a thousand years."
With the way you and others interpret scripture, I'm always wondering how God would have to have written His word on any given subject in order to get you and others to believe that He was speaking literally. At the end of each scripture would He have had to have added "No, really! I mean a literal thousand years?!"
With your manner of interpretation, If the word of God said, "The sky is blue sayeth the Lord" you guys would be scrambling through OT scriptures in order to figure out what God meant by the sky being blue. That sounds ridiculous, but that is how you interpret scripture.
The level of spiritual deception in these last days never ceases to amaze me.
Where are Abraham, Moses, Jacob and David now?
Dead in the grave or in heaven?
Jesus tells us in the Bible.
The NT is written in Koine Greek. This language is the "common" Greek spoken in Jesus' day. It has degenerated or gotten simpler from classical Greek forms. For example, the optative form is almost gone in the Bible. The diagramma letter is gone. I guessed the apostles chose to remain in the vernacular, so people would actually understand what was written.
I had not heard of these, but I found quite a bit on the internet about it. You probably have a different search engine where you are, which is why it is not showing up.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Linear-A
Here are a few more links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_A
https://graecomuse.wordpress.com/ancient-language-resources/linear-a-and-b/
I have never studied these scripts, because they were not used in the same time or place as Koine Greek. I know most Greek translators have studied classical Greek, but I am not on that track, right now!
lol, but if you lived 2000 yeas ago and ask someone about the same word they would have brought up Chiliasm the second you ask,and why is that they believed in 6 sets of 1000 ect. and the 7th was the mill.,,,(thats what they saw)