You spout a lot of theory, but little substance. Oh, there are exceptions in the states that ban abortion, which clearly explains why avoidable deaths from pregnancies are increasing, especially in those states, the exceptions are so clear. Cases where, by date X, one must decide if the fetus is killed or if both the mother and the fetus are killed, and we are keeping the guidelines so vague that few doctors dare make the call, so increased deaths for both mother and fetus courtesy of the state legislature.
And egregiously wrong is an overstatement, the Supreme Court has reversed itself on other occasions when new arguments are brought forth. Many times, when they conducted hearings for new justices, I have wished that a candidate would have honestly answered that they could see the possibility of an argument to overturn the right to abortion without detailing what they thought such an argument would look like, someone finally did that and won. To restore the right to have an abortion, I would personally address it as a religious choice and invoke the clear freedom of religion clause, I am not certain such an approach would work, but it seems a much more solid stance for abortion rights than a right to privacy which was the previous basis. But I am also unwilling to take up the battle, I will leave that to others who wish to impose their will on others. I have enough problems trying to keep myself of the straight and narrow path to God to worry very much about what others are doing to follow that path.
