Archived Russiagate

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

PAC-fit

Well-known member
Sep 20, 2018
984
535
93
Russiagate, ‘far-flung’? Rather, far from dead. As significant new evidence surfaces, it seems corruption is still on the run, their effort to outmaneuver by stonewalling and wordsmithing themselves into an impervious alliance still maintains, it's all “made up". Admittedly, I am confident, Joseph diGinova's reputation as a prudent and successful prosecutor unfolds on this once again effort, there may yet be some head rolling in coming weeks or months. Not years (Mueller, Durham).

SOURCE
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lightbeamrider
Yeah, Donald's so desperate to prove he was done wrong he can't see the midterm train wreck coming right at him. Good thing for Democrats I guess.
 
stonewalling, , themselves into an impervious alliance
As Tulsi Gabbard once testified of this alliance that hamstrings justice, even while right under her nose as acting director:

"I could share a long list of anecdotes and experiences. the means of retaliation and resistance.

Some would be so petty they would make you laugh. I'll give you one quick example.

I needed a a placemat, a big piece of paper printed out for something I needed to share with the president. Had a meeting with him
at 10:00 a.m. in the Oval Office. And there was someone there in my agency that was detailed from a different agency who was responsible for printing these things.

And so I was waiting. Time was 9:15, 9:30. I got to go. I didn't have what I needed.

And uh long story short, the president needed to push the meeting back an hour, which saved me because this guy who was responsible for printing, refused to print it because he disagreed with what was on the paper.

And turns out he actually did print it, but then he locked it in his desk and refused to open his desk.

My chief of staff went down and said, "The director needs to present this to the president. We need this." And he said, "Nope, I refuse."

And so my chief brought down my head of general counsel, who said, "The director needs this for the president. I refuse." And he would not do this until his boss back at his home agency said it was okay to do it. Ridiculous.

There are other examples that are far more serious and grave that would make you concerned for the integrity and future of our republic as I am.

We must remain vigilant.

This isn't a Democrat or Republican issue. These people have been doing this across administrations for decades and longer.

They thrive in the gaps between elections. They are deeply entrenched in the bureaucratic infrastructure. But fundamentally the quality that these people share is that they put themselves, their own interests, their own objectives ahead of our Constitution and the best interests of the American people.

The work of exposing and dismantling these entrenched power structures is not finished.

We the people must continue to hold our leaders accountable to to fight against these deep state actors because they are the nameless, faceless force within our government that doesn't care about you.

They don't care about our freedom. They don't care about our security. They care about themselves and their own power.

The future is in our hands. We must remain vigilant.
 
Looks like an objective article overall. Anonymous sources a red flag, but standard protocol in reporting. Brings back memories, and it always is good that at least Pete Strozk and Lisa Page are going to be on the hot seat and under oath, where lying is a felony. ;)

They made out like bandits, as I recall, even though they were both partisan Trump haters. Not objective investigators. In Florida and not some Dem-run hellhole, another good thing.

AI Overview



The January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign to interfere in the 2016 U.S. election, with the goal of harming Hillary Clinton and aiding Donald Trump. The ICA assessed that Putin developed a "clear preference" for Trump. [1, 2, 3, 4]
However, the question of whether Trump "colluded" with Russia—or if the Trump campaign actively conspired with Russian actors—led to differing conclusions across various investigations.

The Special Counsel Investigation (The Mueller Report)
The investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller was tasked with finding criminal evidence of collusion. [1, 2]
  • No Criminal Conspiracy: The report concluded that the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. [1, 2]
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAC-fit