Are the moon landings fake?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
If you would to rephrase that in English, I'd be happy to answer.

if it was true, why the astronauts that are still living, will not live together under one roof to reminisce with one another about the good old days of being the greatest actors on this planet. Like Aldrin is living alone in an apartment. But if it were true, the others would have asked him to stay with them because they have done something extraordinary together. But it's not true that they know that they are a bunch of liars that they're ashamed to be around each other.
Mostly the elderly like to live in retirement communities with their friends just to be around each other, to find something to do daily with one another. But it's strange they stop communicating right after public and TV appearances was over




 
I read a book about this, can't remember the name unfortunately as it was years ago. One of the main premises in the book were the shadows - apparently there are either no shadows on the moon, or they didn't line up correctly - something like that. It was really interesting to ponder that the moon landings could have been fake - it would have been very easy to do I reckon.
If I remember the name of the book I will post it on here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie

Spoiler: Astronaut who went to the moon debunks the idea that they were faked. For those who do not know, there was no AI and no photoshop in the 1960's.
Yep sure they went to the moon on 1960's technology and landed successfully every time in a lunar lander that was never tested in the environment in which they would be using it. Not one problem was encountered with the exception of Apollo 13 which was done to bring viewership back to the "moon landings" it was a money thing. Yes I believe that was faked as well. The astronauts on apollow 13 had no heat, they would have all died from the cold. The Russians sent a dog up in low orbit without heat. It froze to death. Remember television technology was terrible back then. We didnt' have high def TV's, it was grainy antenna TV accept for the very few and I mean very few places that had cable. All you have to do is ask yourself if we went, why did we stop going and not build a moon base. Especially considering we were way behind the Russians in the space race but then suddenly we leapt ahead by miraculously going to the moon, but, contrary to human desires, we didn't colonize it. Instead we have focused on low orbit projects ever since. That makes no sense at all. A person just has to look at it from a common sense perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie
Yep sure they went to the moon on 1960's technology and landed successfully every time in a lunar lander that was never tested in the environment in which they would be using it. Not one problem was encountered with the exception of Apollo 13 which was done to bring viewership back to the "moon landings" it was a money thing. Yes I believe that was faked as well. The astronauts on apollow 13 had no heat, they would have all died from the cold. The Russians sent a dog up in low orbit without heat. It froze to death. Remember television technology was terrible back then. We didnt' have high def TV's, it was grainy antenna TV accept for the very few and I mean very few places that had cable. All you have to do is ask yourself if we went, why did we stop going and not build a moon base. Especially considering we were way behind the Russians in the space race but then suddenly we leapt ahead by miraculously going to the moon, but, contrary to human desires, we didn't colonize it. Instead we have focused on low orbit projects ever since. That makes no sense at all. A person just has to look at it from a common sense perspective.
The whole conspiracy theory about moon landings has been thoroughly debunked. It happened. It was hard enough getting there.

Colonising the moon is still a long way off even with decades of technological development. It will likely be populated by robots rather than people. I think you are ignorant of just how expensive it is to get to the moon. The Apollo program cost $250 billion. It is even more expensive to fund a colony. And for what?

If you had any integrity, you would do some research instead of slandering people who put everything into beating the Russians to the moon. Some of those astronauts were born again Christians. Calling them liars does not impress God.

It was also expensive. In today's terms, the Apollo program cost about $250 billion dollars.

Speculation is not fact. It's a shame that resort to it. You insult some truly courageous and capable men, including born again Christians. If they wanted to fake moon landings, they would have been better off using real actors.

I don't know why people who call themselves Christians have to look for evil in everything. There is enough real evil to contend with.

"Common sense"? Nations spend billions on pointless research tools such as the Large Hadron Collider. It cost $5 billion and around $1 billion a year to run. It may not be common sense, but it exists.
 
The whole conspiracy theory about moon landings has been thoroughly debunked. It happened. It was hard enough getting there.

Colonising the moon is still a long way off even with decades of technological development. It will likely be populated by robots rather than people. I think you are ignorant of just how expensive it is to get to the moon. The Apollo program cost $250 billion. It is even more expensive to fund a colony. And for what?

If you had any integrity, you would do some research instead of slandering people who put everything into beating the Russians to the moon. Some of those astronauts were born again Christians. Calling them liars does not impress God.

It was also expensive. In today's terms, the Apollo program cost about $250 billion dollars.

Speculation is not fact. It's a shame that resort to it. You insult some truly courageous and capable men, including born again Christians. If they wanted to fake moon landings, they would have been better off using real actors.

I don't know why people who call themselves Christians have to look for evil in everything. There is enough real evil to contend with.

"Common sense"? Nations spend billions on pointless research tools such as the Large Hadron Collider. It cost $5 billion and around $1 billion a year to run. It may not be common sense, but it exists.

the thing about the moon landing and flat earth is this- what does it matter??

them being real or not has no effect on people's lives. they certainly have nothing to do with a Christians walk with Christ..
 
the thing about the moon landing and flat earth is this- what does it matter??

them being real or not has no effect on people's lives. they certainly have nothing to do with a Christians walk with Christ..
When Christians are being called the worst kind of liars, I believe that it does matter. Flat earth just reveals how illogical and unreasonable people can be. Slandering men of God is in a different category. What's worse is that the gullible simply swallow the lies without questioning them and then proceed to spread them around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie and Eli1
the thing about the moon landing and flat earth is this- what does it matter??

them being real or not has no effect on people's lives. they certainly have nothing to do with a Christians walk with Christ..

Agreed.
When a satellite is launched into space it doesn’t care about flat earth or the fake moon landings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gb9
The whole conspiracy theory about moon landings has been thoroughly debunked. It happened. It was hard enough getting there.

Colonising the moon is still a long way off even with decades of technological development. It will likely be populated by robots rather than people. I think you are ignorant of just how expensive it is to get to the moon. The Apollo program cost $250 billion. It is even more expensive to fund a colony. And for what?

If you had any integrity, you would do some research instead of slandering people who put everything into beating the Russians to the moon. Some of those astronauts were born again Christians. Calling them liars does not impress God.

It was also expensive. In today's terms, the Apollo program cost about $250 billion dollars.

Speculation is not fact. It's a shame that resort to it. You insult some truly courageous and capable men, including born again Christians. If they wanted to fake moon landings, they would have been better off using real actors.

I don't know why people who call themselves Christians have to look for evil in everything. There is enough real evil to contend with.

"Common sense"? Nations spend billions on pointless research tools such as the Large Hadron Collider. It cost $5 billion and around $1 billion a year to run. It may not be common sense, but it exists.
The thread is titled "Are the moon landings fake". I said what I believe about them. You can believe what you want and I can believe what I want we don't have to agree it's that simple. Have a great and blessed day.
 
The thread is titled "Are the moon landings fake". I said what I believe about them. You can believe what you want and I can believe what I want we don't have to agree it's that simple. Have a great and blessed day.
My question is always why people imagine that they are fake. Why people are so keen to believe lies and the deluded instead of truth. It's the principle involved. Jesus is the Truth. Satan is the father of lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie
What's worse is that the gullible simply swallow the lies without questioning them[...]
It can be really funny when Ball Earth folks say things like this - because, it actually sounds just exactly like [most] Ball Earth folks - they always believe what they are told without ever questioning whether it is really true or not.

Flat Earth folks question - and do research - to arrive at their own answers - not just taking someone else's word for it.

Very few are more gullible than those who are not even willing to consider the possibility that they have been deceived - or even can be - concerning the most basic facts about the world they live in.

Those who are the most [easily] deceived are those who do not believe it is possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie
So, you flat earthers believe,

The I.S.S. is fake.
Satellites are fake. Google Earth is fake.
Apollo Moon Landings are fake.
10's of Thousands of Planet pictures, all fake.
Planets are round EXCEPT EARTH.
12,000 Satellites in geosynchronous Earth Orbit are fake. ( may be more now)
United States Military Space Command using these Satellites is Fake
N.A.S.A., E.S.A., ROSCOSMOS., C.N.E.S., J.A.X.A., C.N.S.A.,
these agencies and data are hoaxes also? (AND 20-30 more).
Seriously??


My question is always why people imagine that they are fake. Why people are so keen to believe lies and the deluded instead of truth. It's the principle involved. Jesus is the Truth. Satan is the father of lies.

Once the deception is welcomed in more deception is easily accomplished...
 

The Dr was on the moon.
That's good enough for me 😁 👍🌔
All I know is that the moon is made out of cheese. That the rocket's thrusters will melt the moon causing the moon to be slippery and gooey and melt a giant hole into the moon surface.

And plus, there's no gravity or any resistance to keep the moon buggy on the ground. That one complete revolution of the wheel will have that buggy flipping over because no counterweight in the front

The only moon landing they had done was at the base in Area 51



agqmbs.gif

agqomm.gif



 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie
Unbelievable for me that anyone could think the moon landing is fake.
Someone believing it's a fake, I suspect has some personality disorder, or have a multitude of diagnosis.
 
So, you flat earthers believe,

The I.S.S. is fake.
Satellites are fake. Google Earth is fake.
Apollo Moon Landings are fake.
10's of Thousands of Planet pictures, all fake.
Planets are round EXCEPT EARTH.
12,000 Satellites in geosynchronous Earth Orbit are fake. ( may be more now)
United States Military Space Command using these Satellites is Fake
N.A.S.A., E.S.A., ROSCOSMOS., C.N.E.S., J.A.X.A., C.N.S.A.,
these agencies and data are hoaxes also? (AND 20-30 more).
Seriously??
With some minor corrections - yep - seriously.

There are no "satellites in space"; there may be equipment hanging from some large balloons.

G.E. is based on airplane fly-over photography.

'planets' are "wandering stars"

U.S.M.S.C. has to be just a cover story - like NASA has always been

Once the deception is welcomed in more deception is easily accomplished...
And, that is how they managed to deceive the whole world...

Remember:

Revelation 12:

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie
Unbelievable for me that anyone could think the moon landing is fake.
Someone believing it's a fake, I suspect has some personality disorder, or have a multitude of diagnosis.

i believe the astronauts had waited in space for the earth to take off its belt before they traveled onto the moon.
But I'm surprised that the rocket didn't burn up like a meteorite when traveling through space.

agtf55.gif



But it was nice to see the astronauts going into the capsule right before the launch. And it was nice to see the capsule taking off from the ground without exposing the cable that lifted it up from the ground.

agtc5t.gif
agtcn1.gif
 

Spoiler: Astronaut who went to the moon debunks the idea that they were faked. For those who do not know, there was no AI and no photoshop in the 1960's.

I was a little boy who had a voracious appetite for science and I read everything I could on it including encyclopedias back then. When I watched the landing on the moon "live" on my TV at that time, I saw something odd and immediately asked my dad; why are all the small dust pillows under the lander undisturbed after it landed? Shouldn't that have been blasted away flat by the rocket they used to guide it down to the surface? My dad couldn't answer that question; nor could any other "believer in the landing" to this day. And yes, I've looked into the other well researched data on this so-called landing that confirmed what I saw. (including the Van Allen belts) But those small little pillows of dust ... they locked it down for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ruthie