I do analysis, involving pure math and applied physics.
I have degrees in both - my experience in university was that there are very vocal, loud, influential people in science who are atheistic to the point that it is a religion of its own for them, and because they have some prominence and are often very forward about it, it has a dual effect of making people who believe at least in a God to be quieter and also to drown out what voices they do raise so that it looks like science is almost completely dominated by atheism, more than it really is.
I had a biophysics teacher - on a completely secular school - for example who taught us in proofs about the absurdity of atheistic evolution and the impossibility of life arising by chance. He taught us these things from the facts mankind knows about molecular physics, and biology, and he told us it was for things like these that he actually became a believer, that he had been an atheist before knowledge of the details of creation made it obvious to him he was wrong.
These people exist - the field of microbiology has relatively few people in it who believe life is a accidental random thing. We don't hear about this, and we get told that they are few and far between if they even exist at all, but God who made the universe made it so that it testifies of Him, declaring His power, and making it so that His invisible qualities are evident by what is seen. So people who study very closely the things that are seen and can be seen can hardly do so without being confronted by the truth about whether this is all a chaotic random mess or whether there is evidence that an intelligence appears to be intimately involved in it and the most fundamental levels.
What people do with knowledge of God when they are confronted with it doesn't have that much to do with education etc. Men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. That goes for every sort of people, sadly
1