At what point in our salvation is the blood of Christ applied?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
962
390
63
#1
Is it at the point of faith? Satan would have you believe that’ faith” is the “end”, when actually, it is the beginning. Is it when we repent? When we actually “confess” Christ seems like a good place

We know Jesus shed His blood in His death on the cross. Romans 6:3, God says, Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His DEATH?Therefore, we were buried with Him through baptism into DEATH that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we should also walk in newness of life.”

From this scripture, I would say that we come into contact with the blood of Jesus when we are baptized into His death ( where His blood was shed).

This is in perfect harmony with what Ananias tells Saul in Acts 22:16–“ And now, what are you waiting for? Arise, and be baptized and WASH AWAY YOUR SINS.”
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
9,002
3,953
113
#2
Christ's blood has already been applied to the entire human race. The question is when does it become real for someone; and when do they receive it. When someone hears a clear presentation of the gospel, and the Holy Spirit reveals the truth to them, and they believe; that's where it starts. But that's just the beginning.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,760
2,377
113
#3
Christ's blood has already been applied to the entire human race. The question is when does it become real for someone; and when do they receive it. When someone hears a clear presentation of the gospel, and the Holy Spirit reveals the truth to them, and they believe; that's where it starts. But that's just the beginning.
I think of receiving it as the point we 'step into Him,' the Door. When (His) curtain was rent, so is the way open for whosoever. Everyone one will be resurrected from death (rescued from it, otherwise known as hell and the grave). However, those resurrected outside the Door, will find the Door is shut, and there'll we wailing and gnashing of teeth (as then there's only the lake of fire to hope for).
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
962
390
63
#4
Christ's blood has already been applied to the entire human race. The question is when does it become real for someone; and when do they receive it. When someone hears a clear presentation of the gospel, and the Holy Spirit reveals the truth to them, and they believe; that's where it starts. But that's just the beginning.
Christ’s blood has been SHED for the entire human race, but that doesn’t mean everyone has it. If that were true then no one would be lost because it’s the blood of Christ that removes our sins. And not everyone has had their sins removed.
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
9,002
3,953
113
#5
Christ’s blood has been SHED for the entire human race, but that doesn’t mean everyone has it. If that were true then no one would be lost because it’s the blood of Christ that removes our sins. And not everyone has had their sins removed.
Everyone has it, but not everyone knows it. They have to first hear, then believe.
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
962
390
63
#6
I think of receiving it as the point we 'step into Him,' the Door. When (His) curtain was rent, so is the way open for whosoever. Everyone one will be resurrected from death (rescued from it, otherwise known as hell and the grave). However, those resurrected outside the Door, will find the Door is shut, and there'll we wailing and gnashing of teeth (as then there's only the lake of fire to hope for).
The only problem with this is that there is no scripture that even “hints” of this. The best scripture that explains it is Roman’s 6:3-4. Verse 5 says when we are baptized into His death, we are UNITED with Him in His death. That’s where the blood is—in His death. That is the only place we come into contact with His blood, where it can be applied to us. God says “IF” you are united with Him in His death, you will also be like Him in His resurrection. Verse 6 says then we are “crucified “ with Him and that KILLS the body of sin and it is done away. We are raised to walk in a NEW LIFE! Verse 3. Only by “dying” with Christ in baptism will we be able to “live” with Him verse 8. Verse 17 says that they had been slaves of sin, but after they OBEYED the form of doctrine that he delivered, they were SET FREE from sin and became servants of righteousness. Verse 18. This is in harmony with every other scripture on baptism in the Bible this side of the cross.
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
962
390
63
#7
Everyone has it, but not everyone knows it. They have to first hear, then believe.
No scripture teaches that everyone “HAS” the blood of Christ. It doesn’t even make sense. If we already have it, then we don’t have to do anything—not even believe. Where is the scripture that says this? If you don’t have Bible for this then it is just your “opinion.”
 

ResidentAlien

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2021
9,002
3,953
113
#8
No scripture teaches that everyone “HAS” the blood of Christ. It doesn’t even make sense. If we already have it, then we don’t have to do anything—not even believe. Where is the scripture that says this? If you don’t have Bible for this then it is just your “opinion.”
Fair enough, have a blessed day.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,187
690
113
#9
Is it at the point of faith? Satan would have you believe that’ faith” is the “end”, when actually, it is the beginning. Is it when we repent? When we actually “confess” Christ seems like a good place

We know Jesus shed His blood in His death on the cross. Romans 6:3, God says, Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His DEATH?Therefore, we were buried with Him through baptism into DEATH that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we should also walk in newness of life.”

From this scripture, I would say that we come into contact with the blood of Jesus when we are baptized into His death ( where His blood was shed).

This is in perfect harmony with what Ananias tells Saul in Acts 22:16–“ And now, what are you waiting for? Arise, and be baptized and WASH AWAY YOUR SINS.”
I think one of the interesting things about Rom6:3 especially because it's Paul writing who speaks so much of being IN Christ, is that here he's saying baptized INTO Christ which seems to depict the entrance into Christ which then becomes the state of being IN Christ.

I agree with you about Faith being the beginning (from the point of view of our response to Him).

Do you see being given the Spirit as being the same or commensurate with being baptized with/by the Spirit?
 

Suze

Active member
Mar 14, 2025
329
192
43
#10
This is just my personal opinion and I have no scripture to back it up , I feel that the blood is applied to us when God decides to pour out His wrath . If we look at the other metaphorical instances : the first at the first Passover , when the blood was applied to the door lintels just before the angel entered Egypt to destroy their firstborn , then we c at the taking of Jericho , just before the Israelites entered the city , Rahab put the scarlet thread in her window . Then I think that the next time it will b aplied is at the end when God pours out His wrath on the nation's , we will b under the blood of our Saviour and it won't touch us . Just my thoughts .
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
21,003
3,396
113
#11
This is just my personal opinion and I have no scripture to back it up , I feel that the blood is applied to us when God decides to pour out His wrath . If we look at the other metaphorical instances : the first at the first Passover , when the blood was applied to the door lintels just before the angel entered Egypt to destroy their firstborn , then we c at the taking of Jericho , just before the Israelites entered the city , Rahab put the scarlet thread in her window . Then I think that the next time it will b aplied is at the end when God pours out His wrath on the nation's , we will b under the blood of our Saviour and it won't touch us . Just my thoughts .
I think you make some valid points here
 

sawdust

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2024
1,318
305
83
68
Australia
#12
Is it at the point of faith? Satan would have you believe that’ faith” is the “end”, when actually, it is the beginning. Is it when we repent? When we actually “confess” Christ seems like a good place

We know Jesus shed His blood in His death on the cross. Romans 6:3, God says, Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His DEATH?Therefore, we were buried with Him through baptism into DEATH that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we should also walk in newness of life.”

From this scripture, I would say that we come into contact with the blood of Jesus when we are baptized into His death ( where His blood was shed).

This is in perfect harmony with what Ananias tells Saul in Acts 22:16–“ And now, what are you waiting for? Arise, and be baptized and WASH AWAY YOUR SINS.”
There is no point in our salvation because we are not saved until the blood is applied for there is no forgiveness apart from His blood. (Ephesians 1:7; Colossians 1:14)

His blood is applied when we are baptized by the Holy Spirit and that occurs when we believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. If not, we have ourselves an oxymoron, saved but unforgiven.
 

GWH

Groovy
Oct 19, 2024
4,968
1,065
113
USA-TX
#13
Is it at the point of faith? Satan would have you believe that’ faith” is the “end”, when actually, it is the beginning. Is it when we repent? When we actually “confess” Christ seems like a good place

We know Jesus shed His blood in His death on the cross. Romans 6:3, God says, Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His DEATH?Therefore, we were buried with Him through baptism into DEATH that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we should also walk in newness of life.”

From this scripture, I would say that we come into contact with the blood of Jesus when we are baptized into His death ( where His blood was shed).

This is in perfect harmony with what Ananias tells Saul in Acts 22:16–“ And now, what are you waiting for? Arise, and be baptized and WASH AWAY YOUR SINS.”
Yes, salvation occurs at the moment of repentance/conversion/kerygmatic faith/confession of Christ as Lord/Spirit baptism.
SPUR (Scripture provided upon request)
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
962
390
63
#14
I think one of the interesting things about Rom6:3 especially because it's Paul writing who speaks so much of being IN Christ, is that here he's saying baptized INTO Christ which seems to depict the entrance into Christ which then becomes the state of being IN Christ.

I agree with you about Faith being the beginning (from the point of view of our response to Him).

Do you see being given the Spirit as being the same or commensurate with being baptized with/by the Spirit?

If you mean being given the Spirit as a “gift” when we are baptized (Acts 2:38), no, not the same as “baptism of the Holy Spirit.” A baptism of the Holy Spirit, as far as I can tell from the scriptures, was miraculous. As in Acts 2 and Acts 10. It was an “outpouring” by God. Those who received it were not praying for it or actively seeking it at the time it was given. It was manifested by “signs” like speaking in tongues. And as far as I can tell, it only occurred twice in the New Testament. Not everyone who got the Holy Spirit got it in a baptismal form. There were different ways to receive the Holy Spirit. The apostles got the Spirit in its miraculous, baptismal form in Acts 2 on the day of Pentecost. They could “pass it on” to someone else by laying their hands on someone. But the persons they laid hands on could NOT pass it on to others. For example, Acts 8, Phillip the evangelist had received the Spirit and could perform miracles. See verses 5 & 6. But they (the Christian’s) had to wait for the apostles Peter and John to come to Samaria from Jerusalem to lay their hands on them and give them the Holy Spirit. See verses 14-17. So we conclude from this that Phillip could not give them the Spirit, even though he had it and could perform miracles. It had to come from an apostle. The last way to receive the Spirit was as a “gift” when anyone is baptized. This is more of an indwelling of the Spirit. As in 1 Cor. 6:19. Paul says that our bodies are the “temple of the Holy Spirit” who is in us, whom we got from God.

So, there were 3 different ways to receive the Holy Spirit: 1) by miraculous baptism, Acts 2 & Acts 10; 2) by the laying on of the apostle’s hands, Acts 8:14-17; and 3) by baptism in the name of Jesus. Acts 2:38.
If there is another way, I don’t know what it is.

I Cor. 14 is a description of the various “gifts” of the Spirit that a person could get from the laying on hands of the apostles. There was the gift of prophecy, revelation, speaking in tongues and performing other kinds of “signs” and miracles; healing, interpretation of tongues, etc. Paul puts regulations on these, especially in the church services. See verses 23 & 26.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,187
690
113
#15
If you mean being given the Spirit as a “gift” when we are baptized (Acts 2:38), no, not the same as “baptism of the Holy Spirit.” A baptism of the Holy Spirit, as far as I can tell from the scriptures, was miraculous. As in Acts 2 and Acts 10. It was an “outpouring” by God. Those who received it were not praying for it or actively seeking it at the time it was given. It was manifested by “signs” like speaking in tongues. And as far as I can tell, it only occurred twice in the New Testament. Not everyone who got the Holy Spirit got it in a baptismal form. There were different ways to receive the Holy Spirit. The apostles got the Spirit in its miraculous, baptismal form in Acts 2 on the day of Pentecost. They could “pass it on” to someone else by laying their hands on someone. But the persons they laid hands on could NOT pass it on to others. For example, Acts 8, Phillip the evangelist had received the Spirit and could perform miracles. See verses 5 & 6. But they (the Christian’s) had to wait for the apostles Peter and John to come to Samaria from Jerusalem to lay their hands on them and give them the Holy Spirit. See verses 14-17. So we conclude from this that Phillip could not give them the Spirit, even though he had it and could perform miracles. It had to come from an apostle. The last way to receive the Spirit was as a “gift” when anyone is baptized. This is more of an indwelling of the Spirit. As in 1 Cor. 6:19. Paul says that our bodies are the “temple of the Holy Spirit” who is in us, whom we got from God.

So, there were 3 different ways to receive the Holy Spirit: 1) by miraculous baptism, Acts 2 & Acts 10; 2) by the laying on of the apostle’s hands, Acts 8:14-17; and 3) by baptism in the name of Jesus. Acts 2:38.
If there is another way, I don’t know what it is.

I Cor. 14 is a description of the various “gifts” of the Spirit that a person could get from the laying on hands of the apostles. There was the gift of prophecy, revelation, speaking in tongues and performing other kinds of “signs” and miracles; healing, interpretation of tongues, etc. Paul puts regulations on these, especially in the church services. See verses 23 & 26.
Appreciate the detail.

I've seen you write of baptism before, but never got involved, so my apology for the likely repetition and please correct me where I'm wrong.

It looks like you see baptism as mainly water baptism. So Rom6:3 is speaking of water baptism?

Do you see either of these as correct:

NKJ 1 Corinthians 12:13 For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body-- whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free-- and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.​
NET 1 Corinthians 12:13 For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body. Whether Jews or Greeks or slaves or free, we were all made to drink of the one Spirit.​

If I get literal with the last clause, it can be saying, 'and all [men] were given one Spirit to drink'.​
The "by" and the "in" can be very different meanings.​
Do you see the miraculous baptisms in Acts as the risen Christ doing the baptizing with the Spirit as JohnB said He would do?

Then, is He no longer doing so?
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
17,620
759
113
#16
I think of receiving it as the point we 'step into Him,' the Door. When (His) curtain was rent, so is the way open for whosoever. Everyone one will be resurrected from death (rescued from it, otherwise known as hell and the grave). However, those resurrected outside the Door, will find the Door is shut, and there'll we wailing and gnashing of teeth (as then there's only the lake of fire to hope for).
believe God is risen Son for thee. Stand in that and one day receive God Father's Faith given thee to be content in
Faith overrides, God's Faith given anyone to finally go inside the veil and be content in all things good or bad that happen to them, thanks for your post
 

Karlon

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2023
3,141
1,456
113
#17
it's ready, willing & able before salvation for anyone who believes in God, Jesus & the Holy Spirit. at salvation, immediately.
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
962
390
63
#18
Appreciate the detail.

I've seen you write of baptism before, but never got involved, so my apology for the likely repetition and please correct me where I'm wrong.

It looks like you see baptism as mainly water baptism. So Rom6:3 is speaking of water baptism?

Do you see either of these as correct:

NKJ 1 Corinthians 12:13 For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body-- whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free-- and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.​
NET 1 Corinthians 12:13 For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body. Whether Jews or Greeks or slaves or free, we were all made to drink of the one Spirit.​

If I get literal with the last clause, it can be saying, 'and all [men] were given one Spirit to drink'.​
The "by" and the "in" can be very different meanings.​
Do you see the miraculous baptisms in Acts as the risen Christ doing the baptizing with the Spirit as JohnB said He would do?

Then, is He no longer doing so?
Yes, I believe Romans 6:3 is water baptism. The imagery is of one being “buried” ( in water) and then “raised” up out of the water to a new life. Verse 4. While in the water, we are “United” with Christ in His death (verse 5) and we are “crucified” with Him in His death ( verse 6). So that our old body of sin is removed or “done away”. We are no longer slaves of sin. Those who have “died with Christ” in baptism have been “ freed from sin” and we shall live with Him. Verse 7. It’s a beautiful picture!!

I had to look up the definitions of “by” and “ in” and I’m not sure if this is right, but what I found was “by” refers to who does the action or how it was performed. So in 1 Cor. 12:13 by the Spirit of God we were All baptized into the body of Christ. This is the same Spirit that Is talked about in Ephesians 4:4 there is one Lord, one faith, one Spirit and one baptism. I don’t mean to get off the subject here but we know the Bible speaks of at least 5 baptisms: 1) John’s Baptism, 2) baptism of fire ( hell), 3) baptism of suffering, 4) Holy Spirit baptism and 5) baptism in the name of Christ. I believe the meaning of “one” in Ephesians 4 is that there is only one that is for salvation. That’s another subject for maybe another time.

So, 1 Cor. 12:13, “In” the Spirit, my source said that “in” means “What was used to perform the action.” Or the position or “place” of it. I really don’t see much difference; I think it safe to say, the Holy Spirit is the one putting us into the body of Christ when we are baptized. That is the purpose of the action of baptism—to put us into the body of Christ. Verse 27, he says “YOU are the body of Christ, but members individually. The Spirit is the one who performs the action of actually putting us into Christ’s body. However, that happens, spiritually, it is done by the power of the Holy Spirit. . It reminds me of how the Spirit of God was involved in the creation of the world—the Spirit of God moved on the face of the waters.” Gen. 1:2

It’s hard for me to differentiate the Godhead when it comes to miraculous baptism. Yes, it probably is as you say,
Christ and the Spirit, but they all work together as “one” so much that it’s hard to give a definite answer.

As to your last question: Let me start out by reminding us that in the 1st century when these events in the Bible were happening, there was no written Bible. We have a new religious movement, whose leader and founder Jesus Christ has been killed, and no one knows what they are suppose to do, how to act, or even what to think. Jesus had to leave, but He left them the apostles and the Holy spirit called “the helper” to guide them. The apostles, who God filled with His Holy Spirit (Acts 2), began getting revelations from God via the Spirit and began writing these things down in “letters” to the churches; again GUIDED by the Spirit. The letters were circulated among the different congregations (Col. 4:16) to be read by all. It was some time before they had all of God’s revelation compiled into one book, the Bible. Until that time, they had to rely on spiritual gifts of prophecy, revelation, interpretation of tongues, healing, knowledge, etc. these “gifts” were important to the early church in order for them to function. But 1 Corinthians 13 tells us that they are only going to be temporary. When the “perfect” will of God, the Bible, is completed, there will no longer be any need for spiritual gifts. See 1 Corinthians. 13:8, Romans 12:2, and James 1:25. Since the Holy Spirit could not be “passed on” from person to person, when the last apostle died, and when the last person that had the gift of the Spirit died, then spiritual gifts ceased.

Miraculous baptism was used as a “Sign” that God approved. In Acts 2, it was a sign to the Jews at Pentecost that these men were from God and their message was from God. Notice what happened.The apostle began speaking in tongues and it got the attention of all the Jews. Read verses 6-12 of Acts 2. The Holy Spirit baptism was not used to SAVE anyone. It was used as a “sign” to get their attention and to prove they were from God.

Now go to Acts 10. The first time the Spirit was given to the Jews. Now, it is given to the gentiles—to prove to the Jews that God was including gentiles as recipients of the gospel. The Jews had always been God’s chosen people and gentiles had been hated by them. It took something shocking to convince them that it wasn’t going to be this way anymore. Read verses 44-46. When the H. S. fell on the gentiles, the Jews were amazed! The Holy Spirit baptism was accompanied by the speaking in tongues just like in Acts 2. The Jews who were not there at that time “contended” with Peter because he had gone into a gentile home. But when Peter told them about the gentiles receiving the baptism of the Spirit, the other Jews said, “Then God has also granted to the gentiles repentance to life.” The miraculous baptism of the Spirit on the gentiles was a “sign” to the doubtful Jews of the gentiles acceptance by God. Please notice that No where in the scriptures in either Acts 2 or Acts 10 does it ever imply in any way that miraculous baptism of the Holy Spirit saved anyone. The purpose of this baptism was not for salvation. After Cornelius and his house received the Holy Spirit, they were then COMMANDED by Peter to be”water” baptized. Verse 48. This causes me to believe that baptism in the name of Jesus is the “one “ baptism that removes our sins as Peter said in Acts 2 and is the “ one” baptism talked about in Ephesians 4:4.

Bear with me while I make one other point: Going back to Acts 8, those people in Samaria, who had believed and been baptized in verse 12, were saved when they BELIEVED and were BAPTIZED according to what Jesus says in Mark 16:16, but they did not receive the Holy Spirut until Peter and John came from Jerusalem and laid their hands on them. Verses 15-17). So there is no indication that the Holy Spirit was given to “save” anyone. It was given to impart spiritual gifts to be used by the early Christians.

I realize you may not be in agreement with me on this. That’s alright. I appreciate you reading this lengthy post and allowing me the opportunity to share what I believe the Bible teaches.
 

Beckworth

Well-known member
May 15, 2019
962
390
63
#19
There is no point in our salvation because we are not saved until the blood is applied for there is no forgiveness apart from His blood. (Ephesians 1:7; Colossians 1:14)

His blood is applied when we are baptized by the Holy Spirit and that occurs when we believe in the Lord Jesus Christ. If not, we have ourselves an oxymoron, saved but unforgiven.
I agree. There is no salvation without the blood of Jesus. So, salvation and the blood of Jesus must happen at the same time.

I don’t find any scripture that indicates or implies that the blood is applied at the point of faith or belief. Probably because we are not saved by “faith only” as James plainly says. So there is no oxymoron. The Bible is consistent with itself—no salvation by faith only and no blood of Jesus applied. James 2:24. The Bible does not contradict itself.
 

sawdust

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2024
1,318
305
83
68
Australia
#20
I agree. There is no salvation without the blood of Jesus. So, salvation and the blood of Jesus must happen at the same time.

I don’t find any scripture that indicates or implies that the blood is applied at the point of faith or belief. Probably because we are not saved by “faith only” as James plainly says. So there is no oxymoron. The Bible is consistent with itself—no salvation by faith only and no blood of Jesus applied. James 2:24. The Bible does not contradict itself.
You're right, we're not saved by faith only, we are saved by grace working through faith.

I showed you James is not talking about works saving us but how they justify our faith. Context is everything. James is talking about faith, not salvation. Our salvation is made possible by grace working through faith. Our works justify the validity of our salvation, they do nothing to actually save us.

You are not making sense. You say salvation and Christ's blood must happen at the same time yet also say there is no evidence for it. So how do you see it working out? You have forgiveness (blood applied) but no faith? Or you have faith but no forgiveness. Unless the two are applied in union you do have an oxymoron.