Do you think I said Moses was given laws differing from God's laws?I haven't read any place in scripture that Moses was given laws differing from God's laws. Do you have scripture that says Moses wrote laws down that were not from God?
Do you think I said Moses was given laws differing from God's laws?I haven't read any place in scripture that Moses was given laws differing from God's laws. Do you have scripture that says Moses wrote laws down that were not from God?
Agreed.And what is your basis for a holiness interpretation in this passage?Elin said:That is a Judaizing gloss, the food laws were not about health, but holiness.
They were regulations of defilement, as in other defilement regulations, to teach the meaning
of spiritual defilement, and holiness as separation from spiritual defilement.
We know they were not about health because God gave mankind everything that lives and moves for food in Ge 9:3, and the NT goes back to that standard (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14; 1Tim 4:3-5; Heb 9:9-10; Col 2:16-17).
The same foods were healthy prior to Leviticus, unhealthy in Leviticus, and then healthy again in the NT.
There is no Biblical basis for the Mosaic food laws as prescriptions for health,
in light of Ge 9:3 and Mk 7:19, etc.
Gen 7:1 Then the LORD said to Noah, "Come into the ark, you and all your household, because I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation.
Gen 7:2 You shall take with you seven each of every clean animal, a male and his female; two each of animals that are unclean, a male and his female;
There is not instruction about holiness here. In fact, there is no instruction about what clean and unclean is. It was well known at that time.
Agreed.
The food laws were given through Moses in Leviticus, and repeated in Deuteronomy.
That is human thinking with no Biblical basis.Yet they existed at the time of the flood. They are not about ceremony,
they are about the proper fuel to use in the human body.
What matters is how Scripture sees it, and that is not how God's laws are presented in Scripture.
None of God's laws are Moses' laws.
Where did you get this erroneous dichotomy?
Only because God gave them to Moses for Israel, are they called Mosaic laws,
as distinct from other OT laws God gave, such as to Abraham in Ge 17:1 and Ge 17:10-11 (circumcision).
It's not complicated.
Let's not divide what God has joined in his laws.
I haven't read any place in scripture that Moses was given laws differing from God's laws. Do you have scripture that says Moses wrote laws down that were not from God?
Do you think I said Moses was given laws differing from God's laws?
Actually, clean and unclean were well know before the flood...Gen 7:1 Then the LORD said to Noah, "Come into the ark, you and all your household, because I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation. Gen 7:2 You shall take with you seven each of every clean animal, a male and his female; two each of animals that are unclean, a male and his female; This si not human reasoning, it is a matter of the Biblical record.That is human thinking with no Biblical basis.First of all, food regulations were never given as the basis of a covenant.Secondly, please show where all the food commands given in Leviticus were given prior to Leviticus.
We don't know if the distinction was about food, or sacrifice, or both.Actually, clean and unclean were well know before the flood...Gen 7:1 Then the LORD said to Noah, "Come into the ark, you and all your household, because I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation. Gen 7:2 You shall take with you seven each of every clean animal, a male and his female; two each of animals that are unclean, a male and his female; This si not human reasoning, it is a matter of the Biblical record.
We don't know if the distinction was about food, or sacrifice, or both.
So we don't know if it relates to the food laws of Leviticus, or not.
Not knowing either, it is irrelevant to Leviticus.
Nor is it difficult for me to understand either, yes there were unclean animals.You don't, but
it is not really difficult for some of us to understand that there are clean and unclean animals.
Either there are, or there aren't. Bible says there are.
Methinks the pot is calling the kettle black.Scavenger animals and sea scavengers are nasty. Science agrees. Swine eats filth and that changes to flesh on their bones within 4 hours. Yuk. They are definitely not clean, and instructions not to eat them are for our benefit, as with all the other instructions. Just because we don't understand and don't want to obey, we go to all lengths to make null and void the Torah.
Methinks the pot is calling the kettle black.
Do you not do the same in placing yourself above the revelation spoken by the Son in these last days
(Heb 1:1-2), through the NT writers in Mk 7:19; Ro 14:4; 1Tim 4:3-5, etc.?
What matters is how Scripture sees it, and that is not how God's laws are presented in Scripture.
None of God's laws are Moses' laws.
Where did you get this erroneous dichotomy?
Only because God gave them to Moses for Israel, are they called Mosaic laws,
as distinct from other OT laws God gave, such as to Abraham in Ge 17:1 and Ge 17:10-11 (circumcision).
It's not complicated.
Let's not divide what God has joined in his laws.
Well then, according to your meaning, God said the same foods were healthy (Ge 9:3), then unhealthy (Lev), and then healthy again (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14; 1Tim 4:3-5, etc.)What? The 2 are not mutually exclusive.Elin said:Methinks the pot is calling the kettle black.Karraster said:Scavenger animals and sea scavengers are nasty. Science agrees. Swine eats filth and that changes to flesh on their bones within 4 hours. Yuk. They are definitely not clean, and instructions not to eat them are for our benefit, as with all the other instructions. Just because we don't understand and don't want to obey,
we go to all lengths to make null and void the Torah.
Do you not do the same in placing yourself above the revelation spoken by the Son in these last days
(Heb 1:1-2), through the NT writers in Mk 7:19; Ro 14:4; 1Tim 4:3-5, etc.?
Do you see any difference between that and labeling the NT (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14, 1Tim 4:3-5, etc.)No need to call me names Elin. Is that loving? Is that good fruit?
That is human thinking with no Biblical basis.
First of all, food regulations were never given as the basis of a covenant.
Secondly, please show where all the food commands given in Leviticus were given prior to Leviticus.
Yet they existed at the time of the flood. They are not about ceremony, they are about the proper fuel to use in the human body.
Well then, according to your meaning, God said the same foods were healthy (Ge 9:3), then unhealthy (Lev), and then healthy again (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14; 1Tim 4:3-5, etc.)
How can declaring the "unhealthy" foods of Lev to be "healthy" in the NT (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14;
1Tim 4:3-5) possibly be for our benefit?
They can't. . .because it's not about our health benefit.
You've got some reckoning to do with the NT word of God.
Do you see any difference between that and labeling the NT (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14, 1Tim 4:3-5, etc.)
as "going to all lengths to make null and void the Torah"?
Nor is it difficult for me to understand either, yes there were unclean animals.
But that is not the issue.
The issue is whether the distinction was about health.
We know the distinction for sacrifices was not about health.
And we know the distinctions in Lev were not about health, for the same foods were clean until Lev,
then unclean until the NT, when they were clean again (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14).
Healthy food (Ge 9:3) does not become unhealthy (Lev), and then healthy again (NT).
So yes, there were clean and unclean animals in the OT prior to Lev,
but we have absolutely no Biblical basis for saying it was about health,
either before, during or after the Levitical food laws,
particularly when Ge 9:3 and Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14 show the contrary.
So that the distinction was about health is a human notion, not a Biblical notion.
Nor is it difficult for me to understand either, yes there were unclean animals.
But that is not the issue.
The issue is whether the distinction was about health.
We know the distinction for sacrifices was not about health.
And we know the distinctions in Lev were not about health, for the same foods were clean until Lev,
then unclean until the NT, when they were clean again (Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14).
Healthy food (Ge 9:3) does not become unhealthy (Lev), and then healthy again (NT).
So yes, there were clean and unclean animals in the OT prior to Lev,
but we have absolutely no Biblical basis for saying it was about health,
either before, during or after the Levitical food laws,
particularly when Ge 9:3 and Mk 7:19; Ro 14:14 show the contrary.
So that the distinction was about health is a human notion, not a Biblical notion.
No sir.
It is the Ten Commandments, the basis of the Sinatic Covenant, which they broke, that is written on hearts.