J
JesusIsAll
Guest
He would never admit that his beliefs are anything like gnostic beliefs, but I think he inadvertently let the cat out of the bag. If you watch closely, their whole teaching is based on rightly dividing between the old and new covenants; which to them means that anything involving dos and don'ts is old covenant (legalism.religion), and anything that is devoid of the same is new covenant (grace).
To be serious, I saw that he could have been saying the revelation of the loving God and suffering Messiah of our Lord Jesus as setting straight the infinite love of the God of the Old Testament, that, mind you, is also Christ, in the Old Testament. I hope he wasn't saying the God of the Old Testament changed (which would be changing Himself, God who does not change?!), as opposed to revealing His work of salvation and grace by faith. As to the law given to Israel, the Lord, through Paul, is clear on the Christian's place in relation to this, and, otherwise, a dead horse bicker around here, the stuff of Jew-lite cults pushing doctrines of demons.