The economy was actually in pretty good shape under obama. It was George Bush who spent eight trillion dollars invading Iraq for no reasonHeh... And the great Obama said that ratcheting up the national debt was anti-patriotic.
They also say they're anti-fascist -- while they try to use the SCOTUS to become our constitution.
Even if the federal government tries this, there'll be civil disobedience, probably from multiple states.
He had a reason. It just wasn't relevant to the 9-11 terror attack. Revenge, and oil. Not for us, but for others in a political deal. And raiding the antiquities was a bonus.The economy was actually in pretty good shape under obama. It was George Bush who spent eight trillion dollars invading Iraq for no reason
The debt rose dramatically under Obama, doubling in his eight years the entire national debt.The economy was actually in pretty good shape under obama. It was George Bush who spent eight trillion dollars invading Iraq for no reason
If they decide the constitution is no longer relevant it sounds like the US is no longer a country.That might actually be a good idea. What happens if the supreme Court decides the second amendment is no longer relevant?
"The economy was actually in pretty good shape under obama. It was George Bush who spent eight trillion dollars invading Iraq for no reason
https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/sites/default/files/R-BR-0917.pdfThe debt rose dramatically under Obama, doubling in his eight years the entire national debt.
That $8 trillion was spent through the totality of the wars' lengths, not all under Bush's 2 terms. Still, that's a healthy chunk of change. Even so, Bush's tax cuts brought in tons of cash to the feds. Aside from war expenditures, the money was largely wasted, as usual, and not put towards the debt.
As for Bush's motives to attack Iraqi, everyone seems to have their own opinions of this. Oh he did it for oil (of which we've actually received very little... it mostly went to our military there).. he did for revenge... my take on this is that he felt he could start a democratic domino effect in the Middle East. That was erroneous thinking (20/20 hindsight), but at the time, I understood and supported it. Also, Saddam kept flagrantly violating the UN's mandates, and we had 5 other countries, three of them not friendly to the US, confirm that he had WMD programs in the works.
Obama was a socialist-progressive, hostile to Biblically-minded Christians and the State of Israel. Progressives are fascists. Bush was none of these.
I'm not under the belief that Bush was a great president. But, the country was certainly managed better than under Obama. Although, that is a low bar.
That's probably why it's not a good idea to let nine judges make these types of decisions.If they decide the constitution is no longer relevant it sounds like the US is no longer a country.
Agreed, the Roe v. Wade decision 50 years ago ranks as one of the five worst decisions made by the Supreme court.That's probably why it's not a good idea to let nine judges make these types of decisions.
Or maybe appointed positions shouldn't even be a thing in the first place?Agreed, the Roe v. Wade decision 50 years ago ranks as one of the five worst decisions made by the Supreme court.
Seriously? Look at how they are trying to intimidate these judges. It is out in the open because they are appointed for life. If not for that the arm twisting would be in back rooms.Or maybe appointed positions shouldn't even be a thing in the first place?
Maybe all judges should be elected and not appointedSeriously? Look at how they are trying to intimidate these judges. It is out in the open because they are appointed for life. If not for that the arm twisting would be in back rooms.
That would be pushed back on so much. The hard Left wants the SCOTUS to BE the constitution. That is something we must not let happen. Not ever.If they decide the constitution is no longer relevant it sounds like the US is no longer a country.
We all believed, Dems and Repubs alike, that he had WMD programs. Russia, China, France, Germany, England and Israel -- if I have my facts straight and my memory is correct -- all corroborated this. So, we felt that after 9/11, we could no longer sit by and let a threat fester. These Islamo-fascists were serious, so we had better be too.https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/sites/default/files/R-BR-0917.pdf
"
Democrats Voted for Iraq War
Former Democratic presidential candidates John Kerry and Hillary Clinton both voted to authorize the invasion of Iraq.
Oct. 25, 2018 12:45 pm ET
SHARE
TEXT
5
Ellis Burruss attempts again to push the myth that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney alone favored the 2003 invasion of Iraq—and ignored the urgings not to do so by peace-loving Democrats (“We Should Not Get Over the Bush-Cheney War,” Letters, Oct. 12). Once again, Democrats need to be reminded that former Democratic presidential candidates John Kerry and Hillary Clinton both voted to authorize the invasion.
"
https://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-voted-for-iraq-war-1540485940
Not allWe all believed, Dems and Repubs alike, that he had WMD programs. Russia, China, France, Germany, England and Israel -- if I have my facts straight and my memory is correct -- all corroborated this. So, we felt that after 9/11, we could no longer sit by and let a threat fester. These Islamo-fascists were serious, so we had better be too.
They already are and I feel like that's entirely too much authority to nine judgesThat would be pushed back on so much. The hard Left wants the SCOTUS to BE the constitution. That is something we must not let happen. Not ever.
No, that's true. I meant that in a general sense. "Many" would be more accurate, but it included Left and Right alike.Not all