Jewel5712 you do not tell me what to do sorry but i'm not your man . I have problem with women you have problem with imaturity and I will pm you tooGood bye
![]()
FINALLY!
Jewel5712 you do not tell me what to do sorry but i'm not your man . I have problem with women you have problem with imaturity and I will pm you tooGood bye
![]()
And what is the Holy Spirit saying? Believe that Jesus is the son of God. It all boils down to the same thing.
Sanctification in verb tense is a process..youre referimg to an over all name..
I think not.
to open their eyes so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the dominion of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who have been sanctified (perfect passive participle) by faith in Me.'
Acts 26:18
ηγιασμενοις verb - perfect passive participle - dative plural masculine
hagiazo hag-ee-ad'-zo: to make holy, i.e. (ceremonially) purify or consecrate; (mentally) to venerate -- hallow, be holy, sanctify.
The perfect passive participle shows a completed action
A participle is the adjective form of the verb.
We have postional sanctification (set apart), we learn to live out this positional sanctification.
Fair comment, UnderGrace. To fully prove the connection may not be possible. However the fetal developing tissues, nerves, etc, saturated in higher-than-normal stress hormones clearly stifles normal development. This is established statistically, as the links indicate.
Higher estrogen levels in the stressed mother may result in altered gender-certainty in the male fetus, neurologically. Yes, you're right, it is speculation. I have not met a homosexual male who feels they 'had a choice' to be that. Is that self-justification or genuine mis-wiring of their central nervous system?
Everyone is entitled to thier opinion..we'll just have to agree to disagreebut..your last sentence "learn to live" implies ongoing..a "process"..not complete..
The correct answer would be NO! (1 Cor. 6:9-11)
Yet some people think you could:
**link removed**
It is sad how deceived somebody can be.
HI again, UnderGrace. Your points are valid. What came to mind, particularly about 'slavery to sin', is that GENETICS is not the source of BEHAVIOUR. This was the huge disappointment of the Human Genome Project; the mapping of human genes. SIN is behaviour, by commission or omission. Genes are protein structures, some of which code for protein production. The purpose of the rest of ones' genes is speculated to result in physical features and physical attributes. No genetic connection to behaviour can be observed, only to physical structures.Here let me give the rundown according to what is out there in research land.
There is no gay gene although they keep trying.
While some studies reported possible hormonal differences affecting homosexual orientation. However, these studies were often directly contradictory, and never actually measured any hormone levels, but just used proxies for hormonal influences, without direct evidence that the proxies were actually indicative of true hormone levels or imbalances.
Now twin studies are very interesting, they showed that there may be a genetic influences (not an actual gene) for homosexuality, although similar studies have shown some genetic influences for homophobia and even opposition to abortion which then caused the whole genetic premise to be questioned.
This is what Jesus tells us about sin.....
Jesus answered them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin.
John 8:34
That is an interesting question. I am not suggesting you think what I am about to say, the question is somewhat incomplete or asked on a false understanding of two things.Can one sin and still be a Christian? Just wondering.
HI again, UnderGrace. Your points are valid. What came to mind, particularly about 'slavery to sin', is that GENETICS is not the source of BEHAVIOUR. This was the huge disappointment of the Human Genome Project; the mapping of human genes. SIN is behaviour, by commission or omission. Genes are protein structures, some of which code for protein production. The purpose of the rest of ones' genes is speculated to result in physical features and physical attributes. No genetic connection to behaviour can be observed, only to physical structures.
(The dark side of our genetic understanding, I think, is our recently perfected ability to alter genetic structures. Very major potential for damage, and some hope for health-producing applications.)
The question becomes, 'What is the source of our sinful behaviour', because it is certainly not genetic. Science generally does not acknowledge our spiritual essence. (The Spirit gives life, the flesh counts for nothing)
The only power to overcome sinful behaviour of any sort is the power given by Jesus, who broke the power of sin and death by His perfect sacrifice.
Sorry darlin'. missed your point on that.Let's say God is creator of all things for his glory and according to his will.
OK, we're there? Letting us picture that for the moment?
OK.
Did God create those who are the antithesis of heterosexual soley, souly so he , in his omniscient authorative state, send them to the Hell he opened to receive our fallen unrepentant souls? When at first he, who does not change, created that place of suffering for Ha~Satan and his follower's, the fallen angels, angli- "emissary", ? THINK about it.
Something I saw on a holiness bumper sticker that is very valid today. THINK about what U believe.
Was it Constantine? That led you?
Or is it the Chist?
HELLO...
the Truth shall set you free, if you have the b....?
probably won't spell this right, but cahoonas???=heart...
OH MY WORD..I GET IT NOW..lol. Had a different mindset from the other thread i was in..took me a minute to "adjust"..lolprobably won't spell this right, but cahoonas???=heart...
probably won't spell this right, but cahoonas???=heart...
Lol n i even get you .=heart (image) lol they dont have that as an emoji..lol