Those still able to speak do certainly ask for healing but many are not able to ask verbally but it is clearly in their eyes.
Anyone sick can want to be better. But, are they willing to accept it from Jesus........ with what He says that entails.
Those still able to speak do certainly ask for healing but many are not able to ask verbally but it is clearly in their eyes.
I have a question for you. Are you willing to read William J. Jackson's book, Thyagaraga; Life and Lyrics? Its 418 pages of Hindu miracles. It is full of miracles of healings and wonders that simply defy natural explanation. He has observed such himself.I can certainly understand why someone would believe this if all they have seen is charlatans. Those who have seen firsthand the real gifts in operation (even one of them) cannot accept your view. I don't expect you to change your view to suit my experience, but by the same principle, why would I change mine to match your interpretation?
Regarding miraculous healings, I would encourage you to read Craig Keener's recent book on miracles. He has collected testimonies of healings that simply defy natural explanation. I've observed such things.
One question I have for you specifically: do you ever ask God a question, seek direction, or anything of the sort? How does He answer you?
The problem there is not with believing that the gifts are still in operation, but rather that there are people being deceitful to push said false doctrines. Scripture warns us of this and yes, it is a real problem. But I've seen and heard so many people use this as reasoning for why the gifts have ceased altogether which is a case of throwing out the baby with the bath water.
I will ask them if they really, really, really want to accept a healing from Jesus. Maybe that's why the healers never respond to my request, they also have the gift of knowing who does not deserve a healing.Anyone sick can want to be better. But, are they willing to accept it from Jesus........ with what He says that entails.
I will ask them if they really, really, really want to accept a healing from Jesus. Maybe that's why the healers never respond to my request, they also have the gift of knowing who does not deserve a healing.
I will ask them if they really, really, really want to accept a healing from Jesus. Maybe that's why the healers never respond to my request, they also have the gift of knowing who does not deserve a healing.
Miracles still occur but there are no miracle workers apart from God. Healings occur but there are no healers just a faithful, caring God.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
I have the gift of irritation.
I'd tell Willie not to be jealous of my gift...
but I think he has it too.
And these signs shall follow them that believe...This is an honest question rather than an argumentative one... What is meant by the term "Sign gifts?
And these signs shall follow them that believe...
Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought among you in all patience, in signs, and wonders, and mighty deeds.
This is an honest question rather than an argumentative one... What is meant by the term "Sign gifts?
My understanding of "Spiritual" gifts is pretty much "any knowledge, miracle, healing, knowledge, tongue(language), prophecy, teaching, etc given directly by God through his spirit..(as opposed to learned by natural methods). But I'd only heard of 'sign gifts' since coming to this particular site.
"Through His inner "still small" voice." So you aren't one of those guys who believe that since we have God's word He no longer speaks to us personally?
Some of the humor of all this is us deciding how solemnly religious and proper God wants to appear in what He does. When, because of God working through him, Jesus was laughed at, ridiculed, called a drunkard (as were the Apostles also called) and accused of doing what He did because He was in league with the Devil... and finally murdered for being a Blasphemer according to men's eyes.
Yes, it certainly appears God is very worried about how He will look in front of doubting, critical, judging men.
1). Personally, I think that is the best quote of the whole thread...hands down. Thanks, Roger.
2). At least in the few most recent posts I've read, it seemed the childishness finally died down. (That's nice)
3). I felt there were some really good nuggets on both sides of the debate...as long as a person was able to look past the hateful nastiness they were covered in. <-- I don't think that was so easy.
4). I'm hoping we can revisit some of those ideas (not the methods of presentation).
Love in Jesus,
Kelby
I already foresee the response. "There is no new revelation." This is why you'll often see Cessationists denying that we can have actual fellowship with God, actually hear His voice, and receive direction.
Some of the humor of all this is us deciding how solemnly religious and proper God wants to appear in what He does. When, because of God working through him, Jesus was laughed at, ridiculed, called a drunkard (as were the Apostles also called) and accused of doing what He did because He was in league with the Devil... and finally murdered for being a Blasphemer according to men's eyes.
Yes, it certainly appears God is very worried about how He will look in front of doubting, critical, judging men.
Jesus was accused of being with the drunkard and not a drunkard Himself.
His disciples were accused by mockers because they were speaking in foreign languages as I am sure some of the natives did not understand it.
They were not falling down as drunkards do nor as some modern tongue speakers do today.
Proving all things and abstaining from all appearances of evil would make God a hypocrite if He mimic a work of the flesh called drunkenness as if that is a manifestation of the Spirit or a fruit of the Spirit when a house divided cannot stand.
Temperance which is self control is a fruit of the Spirit whereas joy can never be referred to the work of the flesh as drunkenness as some "holy rollers" will attest to. Not all Pentecostals are caught up in that extra phenomenon, but they certainly lay the groundwork for believers to continue past the second blessing or infilling and receive other infilling by other signs of confusion which God is not the author of; and neither is tongues without interpretation for private use is God the author of.
For tongue speakers to draw that line of discernment, they have to renounce the tongue they had gained by that second blessing. You do not need it and God certainly does not need it when talking to any believer personally, obviously. ( which all things are to be tested by the scripture, of course )
Matt 11:19.... King James Bible
"The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners..."
Be careful trying to disprove Scriptures you may not know.