yes i am sure...
the council you are referring to is probably the council of hippo in AD 393...
One of them yes.
this was not an ecumenical council...so it was not binding on the entire church... in fact the two later councils at carthage only agreed to ratify the canon endorsed at hippo pending its acceptance by the rest of the christian church...which never took place...
Actually the Council of Carthage ratified the decisions at the Synod of Hippo and awaited ratification from the "Church across the sea" (I,e, Rome)
also the councils at hippo and carthage were under the authority of augustine of hippo...
Actually Augustine only attended a few of the Synod of Hippo's meetings, and the Councils of Carthage were presided over by Marcellinus of Carthage.
who regarded the canon as -already- established...
Do you have the quote from Augustin by chance?
in other words the councils were only putting in writing what they thought everyone already knew...so they -didn't- actually create the biblical canon there...
They were trying to decide what was scripture from among the large number of books in use. The NT was pretty well formulated at this time, but the OT canon still varied widely from region to region, as can be seen by the fact that every Apostolic Church uses a different OT canon to this day. The only OT canon that was universally accepted by all the Apostolic Churches was the 73 book Catholic OT canon.
finally the latin vulgate was already being translated before those councils took place...and jerome's work presupposed a canon identical to the jewish and protestant old testament canons...
I'm not sure where you've been looking but Jerome translated and included the Deuterocanonical books in the Vulgate. Now Jerome did doubt the authenticity of
someof the Deuterocanonical books (he accepted Judith for example), but he translated and included them in the Vulgate. But whether he actually doubted them or not is somewhat up in the air, since later Jerome said he was simply relating the views of the Jews and not his personal views.
"What sin have I committed if I followed the judgment of the churches? But he who brings charges against me for relating the objections that the Hebrews are wont to raise against the story of Susanna, the Son of the Three Children, and the story of Bel and the Dragon, which are not found in the Hebrew volume (ie. canon), proves that he is just a foolish sycophant.
For I wasn't relating my own personal views, but rather the remarks that they [the Jews] are wont to make against us" (Against Rufinus 11:33 [A.D. 402]).