Christ’s death and resurrection
- Thread starter LightBearer316
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Brother, I appreciate your desire to stay within what’s written; that’s the right aim. But your conclusion about baptism actually adds to what Scripture says rather than simply reading what’s there.
Yes, water baptism is commanded and practiced — but never once does Scripture teach that the act of water itself forgives sin. Peter even clarifies that point directly:
“Not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God.” — 1 Peter 3:21 (KJV)
The power isn’t in the water — it’s in Christ’s blood:
“In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.” — Ephesians 1:7 (KJV)
If water baptism were what saves, then Paul’s words would contradict that truth:
“Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.” — 1 Corinthians 1:17 (KJV)
That’s not Paul dismissing obedience — it’s him drawing a sharp line between the gospel that saves and the symbol that follows.
So when we say baptism represents our faith rather than produces salvation, we’re not “going beyond what is written” — we’re staying exactly with what is written.
Grace and peace — always in His Word.
Aaron56 said:
There are several threads full of scriptural support for why water baptism does not equate to salvation to go to heaven. #shrug
Brother, the “explicit verses” you refer to must be read in context with the whole counsel of God. Scripture never contradicts itself.
When you isolate verses that mention baptism and “salvation” together but ignore dozens that define salvation by faith in Christ alone, that’s not strength — that’s selective reading.
Water baptism is commanded as obedience after belief, but the blood of Christ alone saves. Otherwise, Paul’s words make no sense:
“Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.” — 1 Corinthians 1:17 (KJV)
If baptism were required for salvation, Paul could never have written that under the Spirit’s inspiration.
Grace and peace — standing on the written Word.
There are several threads full of scriptural support for why water baptism does not equate to salvation to go to heaven. #shrug
Brother, the “explicit verses” you refer to must be read in context with the whole counsel of God. Scripture never contradicts itself.
When you isolate verses that mention baptism and “salvation” together but ignore dozens that define salvation by faith in Christ alone, that’s not strength — that’s selective reading.
“By grace are ye saved through faith… not of works.” — Ephesians 2:8–9 (KJV)
“To him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.” — Romans 4:5 (KJV)
Those are explicit too — and they cannot mean something different just because baptism is mentioned elsewhere.Water baptism is commanded as obedience after belief, but the blood of Christ alone saves. Otherwise, Paul’s words make no sense:
“Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.” — 1 Corinthians 1:17 (KJV)
If baptism were required for salvation, Paul could never have written that under the Spirit’s inspiration.
Grace and peace — standing on the written Word.
Brother, it’s not a lie — it’s Scripture. Let’s read what Peter actually wrote, in full:
“The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.” — 1 Peter 3:21 (KJV)
Peter explicitly distinguishes the outward washing from the inward reality.
The water itself doesn’t cleanse sin — Christ’s resurrection and the believer’s faith in Him do.
If water could forgive, Paul wouldn’t have written:
“Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.” — 1 Corinthians 1:17 (KJV)
The act of baptism testifies to salvation already received; it doesn’t create it.
That’s not opinion — that’s staying with exactly what’s written.
Grace and peace — always in His Word.
What you do is cast doubt on explicitly stated verses and use salvation-related verses that don't mention baptism to invalidate those explicitly stated verses. That's not reading in context; that's deceitful reading into the text what you want it to say. It's exactly like satan casting doubt (Ye shall not die) on what God explicitly told Eve (don't eat this fruit or you will die), and then using an alternate truth (for God doth know ye shall become as gods) to seduce her into disobeying what God explicitly commanded
Brother, comparing those who teach salvation by grace through faith to Satan is a serious charge — but it misunderstands what’s actually happening.
No one here is “casting doubt” on Scripture. We’re letting all of Scripture speak, not isolating verses from their context.
Peter says baptism “saves” — but in the same breath explains how:
“Not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God.” — 1 Peter 3:21 (KJV)
That means it’s not the water or ritual that saves — it’s the believer’s faith response to the gospel, made possible by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Paul also writes:
“Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.” — 1 Corinthians 1:17 (KJV)
If baptism were the saving act itself, that statement would contradict Christ — yet Paul wrote it under inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
Reading verses together isn’t deceit — it’s obedience to how Scripture must be handled:
“Comparing spiritual things with spiritual.” — 1 Corinthians 2:13 (KJV)
Grace and peace — holding fast to the whole Word of God.
Explicit
God: "Be baptized into remission of sins and [then] you will receive the holy spirit"
Cast doubt, alternate truth
Satan: "You don't have to be baptized in order to receive forgiveness of sins, for God doth know that you were forgiven and received the spirit when you believed."
Brother, that comparison isn’t fair — nor is it biblical. No one here is doing what Satan did in Eden. Satan contradicted God’s word. What I’m doing is comparing Scripture with Scripture, exactly as we’re commanded to (1 Corinthians 2:13 KJV).
The Bible nowhere says, “Be baptized into remission of sins and then you will receive the Holy Spirit.” That’s a blending of verses, not a quotation.
When Peter preached in Acts 2:38, he spoke to Jews who had just crucified their Messiah and were being called to public repentance and identification with Christ. But when Paul explained salvation later to Gentiles, he wrote clearly:
“In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise.” — Ephesians 1:13 (KJV)
That’s the plain order: hearing → believing → receiving the Spirit.
Water baptism followed as obedience and testimony — not as a condition for forgiveness.
To claim otherwise is not “staying with what is written,” but adding to it. The Spirit seals believers the moment they believe, not when they touch the water (Acts 10:44–47 KJV confirms this too).
Grace and peace — always in His Word.
What he’s calling “explicit” isn’t actually written anywhere in the Bible. It’s a man-made mash-up of two separate passages, stitched together to sound authoritative.
Brother, the phrase “Be baptized into remission of sins and then you will receive the Holy Spirit” isn’t an explicit quote from Scripture — it’s a blending of different verses, not something God said word-for-word.
The actual verse he’s referencing is Acts 2:38 (KJV):
“Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.”
That’s Peter speaking to Jews in Jerusalem who had just rejected their Messiah. The same Peter later saw Gentiles receive the Holy Spirit before baptism (Acts 10:44–47 KJV), proving that the Spirit is received by faith, not by water.
So the line “Be baptized into remission of sins and then you will receive the Holy Spirit” is not a biblical quotation — it’s an interpretation, and a flawed one at that.
If it were truly “explicit,” we’d find those exact words in Scripture — but we don’t.
Grace and peace — holding fast to what is written, not what’s blended together.
Both of these verses are explicit. Remission of sins and receipt of holy spirit follows baptism. Baptism moves one out of sin guiltiness into forgiveness of sins, and out of deadness of spirit into the spirit of life. Baptism saves us. But you will cast doubt on what is explicitly stated in order to establish an alternate truth (faith alone saves) that undermines and invalidates these explicitly stated truths. Exactly what satan did in the garden
Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ into the remission of sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. Acts 2:38
The antitype, baptism, now also saves us. Not the laying aside filth of flesh, but the petition of a good conscience toward God through the resurrection of Jesus Christ: 1 Peter 3:21
Brother, those verses are indeed inspired and true — but neither teaches that the act of water baptism itself removes sin or imparts spiritual life. When we read them in full context, they point to the work of Christ and faith in Him, not the power of water.
Acts 2:38 KJV must be read alongside the whole book of Acts. The same Peter who said that also witnessed Gentiles receive the Holy Spirit before baptism:
“While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.” — Acts 10:44–47 (KJV)
That alone proves baptism follows salvation, not causes it.
And 1 Peter 3:21 KJV even explains itself:
“Not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God, by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”
Peter is careful to say it’s not the outward washing (“filth of the flesh”) that saves, but the inward response of faith made possible through the resurrection.
The blood of Christ — not water — removes sin:
“In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.” — Ephesians 1:7 (KJV)
Calling that “casting doubt” isn’t fair; it’s simply letting Scripture interpret Scripture.
Faith alone saves because Christ alone saves. Baptism is the believer’s obedience that follows.
Grace and peace — always in His Word.
Considering how important baptism is to God, the fact that he commanded it to be done and how ubiquitous its practice is in scripture, it has to be concluded that no servant of God would ever discourage anyone in any way from submitting to it, but would instead be promoting it in every possible way to every soul.
The fact that certain people spend an inordinate amount of time and energy casting doubt on the importance of baptism is clear evidence they are not serving God and seeking what is best for the body of Christ, but are pursuing their own theological agenda. Obsessing over the idea that baptism is not required for salvation doesn't edify the body; it does the opposite; it creates division.
Simply following the example set by the apostles would be the godly and right thing to do. End of story. There's nothing wrong with being baptized, and there's nothing wrong with believing that being baptized in faith saves. But it is wrong to certain people who are pursuing their own theological agenda, and not serving the body of Christ.
The fact that certain people spend an inordinate amount of time and energy casting doubt on the importance of baptism is clear evidence they are not serving God and seeking what is best for the body of Christ, but are pursuing their own theological agenda. Obsessing over the idea that baptism is not required for salvation doesn't edify the body; it does the opposite; it creates division.
Simply following the example set by the apostles would be the godly and right thing to do. End of story. There's nothing wrong with being baptized, and there's nothing wrong with believing that being baptized in faith saves. But it is wrong to certain people who are pursuing their own theological agenda, and not serving the body of Christ.
Brother, no one here is discouraging baptism — we’re simply keeping it in the place Scripture gives it. Baptism is commanded, important, and should be promoted as an act of obedience for every believer. But making it the cause of salvation rather than the result of salvation crosses a biblical line.
Paul never minimized baptism, yet he still wrote under inspiration:
“Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.” — 1 Corinthians 1:17 (KJV)
If baptism were the saving act, those words could not exist in Scripture.
The gospel that saves is the message of Christ’s death and resurrection, received by faith:
“By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you.” — 1 Corinthians 15:1–4 (KJV)
Faith in Christ unites us to Him; baptism declares that union publicly. To defend that truth isn’t to divide the body — it’s to protect the gospel of grace from being mixed with works.
Obedience follows salvation; it never earns it.
Grace and peace — always in His Word.
There's just no reason for this obsessive mission you're on other than pushing a theological agenda. You didn't have time to read my post and then type your response in the 2 minutes between my post and yours, so you are obviously hovering over the keyboard waiting to copy/past prepared material that promotes your agenda
Because their entire agenda is built on baptismal regeneration — the belief that the act of baptism itself causes salvation. That’s why they constantly shift the order, putting obedience and water before faith and grace. Scripture never teaches that. The moment we make baptism the instrument of salvation instead of the response to it, we’ve replaced the gospel of grace with a system of works.
Grace and Peace
Grace and Peace
Brother, I assure you there’s no “agenda” here — only a desire to keep the gospel message clear and faithful to Scripture. I respond quickly because I’ve studied this deeply and have Scripture ready to share, not because I’m here to win arguments.
We both agree baptism matters and should be obeyed. The only question is where Scripture places it in relation to salvation. When Paul said,
“Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel” (1 Cor 1:17 KJV),
he made a distinction we can’t ignore — baptism is important, but it’s not the gospel itself.
There’s nothing obsessive about guarding that truth; it’s the same gospel Paul defended in every letter — salvation by grace through faith, followed by obedience from a grateful heart.
Grace and peace — always in His Word.
Brother, I’m not discouraging baptism in any way — I’m encouraging it in the same way Scripture does: as an act of obedience that follows faith in Christ. What I’m guarding against is confusing the symbol with the source of salvation.
Division doesn’t come from clarifying the Word — it comes when people elevate a ritual above the finished work of Christ. The gospel unites us around grace, not performance.
“For by grace are ye saved through faith… not of works, lest any man should boast.” — Ephesians 2:8–9 (KJV)
Standing firm on that isn’t promoting an agenda — it’s staying faithful to the same gospel Paul preached.
Grace and peace — always in His Word.