Looks like Chicken Brent has already made up his mind. See his response above.
https://youtu.be/pg5_nc1n2ws
This makes sense to me.
Looks like Chicken Brent has already made up his mind. See his response above.
Would you say a saved person could temporarily be deceived by false prophets, even about the Gospel?
When i first heard the Gospel i happily received it. I just thought its too good of an offer to say no to, even though i obviously had some doubts from a whole lifetime of the world telling me otherwise creeping in. I suppose i believed enough to bow my head and pray afterwards.
After that i sometimes thought that its too good to be true and kinda sought out "other versions" (i understand there is only one) and in that process heard a whole bunch of false doctrine.
Yesterday, and sometimes before that, i realized that some of this false doctrine did stick to me.
For example, i used to say "believing means trusting in the finished work of Christ on the cross alone to save you".
Yesterday however i heard a pastor (Steven Anderson) and saw my error corrected. The "finished work of Christ on the cross" is his sinless life. He obviously still had to pay for our sin in hell and rise again. I left those parts out with my saying.
Clearly i spread false doctrine about the Gospel, even though i firmly believed myself to be saved.
My question: Could a saved person temporarily be saved about even the Gospel or was i saved just now?
Please help me understand. Thank you so much.
Stay away from this man and his teachings. He's got it wrong. It is hard to unlearn something that seemed to be a foundation of truth.
Jesus said it is finished. Who is this man to add or take away from these words.
Just curious.. have you been baptised
I think God is going to allow most people to have one or two little errors in their understanding of the gospel. God is not going to give His glory to anybody. Paul had so much of God's truth he had to have a thorn in the flesh to keep him humble. What Jesus said was that the false Christs would not deceive the very elect. (see Matt. 24:24)
![]()
I think God is going to allow most people to have one or two little errors in their understanding of the gospel.
It is not rational but it is clearly heretical (see my preceding post). However since you have chosen error over truth, do not expect more light on the subject. After reading the responses to your OP, you should have accepted the fact that Anderson is a false teacher. But instead you have doubled-down in your false belief. This is typical of most people with false ideas.Isn't it rational to say that because Jesus took up our sin he still had to go to hell?
Would you say a saved person could temporarily be deceived by false prophets, even about the Gospel?
When i first heard the Gospel i happily received it. I just thought its too good of an offer to say no to, even though i obviously had some doubts from a whole lifetime of the world telling me otherwise creeping in. I suppose i believed enough to bow my head and pray afterwards.
After that i sometimes thought that its too good to be true and kinda sought out "other versions" (i understand there is only one) and in that process heard a whole bunch of false doctrine.
Yesterday, and sometimes before that, i realized that some of this false doctrine did stick to me.
For example, i used to say "believing means trusting in the finished work of Christ on the cross alone to save you".
Yesterday however i heard a pastor (Steven Anderson) and saw my error corrected. The "finished work of Christ on the cross" is his sinless life. He obviously still had to pay for our sin in hell and rise again. I left those parts out with my saying.
Clearly i spread false doctrine about the Gospel, even though i firmly believed myself to be saved.
My question: Could a saved person temporarily be saved about even the Gospel or was i saved just now?
Please help me understand. Thank you so much.
Would you say a saved person could temporarily be deceived by false prophets, even about the Gospel?
When i first heard the Gospel i happily received it. I just thought its too good of an offer to say no to, even though i obviously had some doubts from a whole lifetime of the world telling me otherwise creeping in. I suppose i believed enough to bow my head and pray afterwards.
After that i sometimes thought that its too good to be true and kinda sought out "other versions" (i understand there is only one) and in that process heard a whole bunch of false doctrine.
Yesterday, and sometimes before that, i realized that some of this false doctrine did stick to me.
For example, i used to say "believing means trusting in the finished work of Christ on the cross alone to save you".
Yesterday however i heard a pastor (Steven Anderson) and saw my error corrected. The "finished work of Christ on the cross" is his sinless life. He obviously still had to pay for our sin in hell and rise again. I left those parts out with my saying.
Clearly i spread false doctrine about the Gospel, even though i firmly believed myself to be saved.
My question: Could a saved person temporarily be saved about even the Gospel or was i saved just now?
Please help me understand. Thank you so much.
How could the Gospel not be about the deity of Christ (divinity has a somewhat different meaning)? Please note that this passage is a part of the Gospel message:But, the gospel isn't about where Jesus went, or even the divinity of Christ...
Any man who teaches the Holocaust didn't happen, and that homosexuals need to be killed because O.T. Law says so, and his obvious hatred for the State of Israel, should not be trusted at all. Run away from Anderson as fast as your feet can take you.
There has been a lot of confusion simply because the King James translators chose to use the same English word "hell" for three DIFFERENT places: (1) Sheol/Hades, (2) Gehenna, and (3) Tartarus. Christ was very much ALIVE in Hades -- not Gehenna -- for three days and three nights, preaching (or proclaiming) to the spirits in prison His great victory accomplished at the Cross.But people, when Jesus walked the earth he talked about Abraham being alive, so if Jesus was dead for three days and three nights, wouldnt he be in hell?
Christ made "His SOUL an offering for sin" which means that He suffered the torments of Hell within His holy soul while hanging on the Cross. That is why there was total darkness over the whole land for three hours while He suffered intensely for our sins.Also the roasting with fire is part of every sacrifice.
Yes, it is Hades which is in "the heart of the earth" or "the lower parts of the earth". But the Lake of Fire is "in outer darkness".Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
That word in Hebrew is "Sheol" which is the same as Hades.Jonah 2:2 And said, I cried by reason of mine affliction unto the Lord, and he heard me; out of the belly of hell cried I, and thou heardest my voice.
That word in Greek is Hades which is the same as Sheol.Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
That word in Greek is Hades which is the same as Sheol.Revelation 1:18 I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.
This is false because the falling away in the church is exactly christians being deceived & never coming back.Of course it's possible for a saved person to err in knowledge and be deceived. It won't last, though, with a son of GOD.