H
Huckleberry
Guest
Request denied.I think we should all stop judging other people because they sin differently than us.
Request denied.I think we should all stop judging other people because they sin differently than us.
She may have. So, what. What does that have to do with being a sinner? If you tell me you are now perfect and do not sin, I will call you on the authority of the Scripture you are a liar, therefore a sinner. Yet because of Y-shua you keep your position as the righteousness of G-d. But has someone ever become equal to Y-shua and without sin. if you have well cast the first stone….
This statement should not be taken out of context. The context was the Law of Moses and the issue of adultery. Since the accusers could not meet the requirements, the charges were dismissed.Jesus said " he who is without sin cast the first stone" and there were no accuser's for all have sinned and come short.
Apart from the fact that we should judge ourselves first, the Bible does give Christians the right to judge their fellow-believers within the context of their own church. Therefore they may even refuse fellowship with other Christians who persist in their sins. Furthermore, the local church -- through its elders -- has the right to disfellowship Christians who refuse to repent. That is in fact a judgment.So my question to you is who gives you the authority to judge.
Judgment against another Christian is on the basis of whether or not that person is sinning, and the sins of the flesh and spirit are listed several times in the epistles. This judgment is basically to withdraw fellowship so that the sinning brother or sister repents and can be brought back into fellowship.What is judgement against another?
No. When two or three Christians can testify that another Christian is persisting in sinful behavior, it is not slander but judgment.Is judgement the same as slander?
You can't separate the two. The person brings judgment upon himself by sinning.Are we to judge the sin or the person?
.I find it most disturbing that the big sins being brought up are smoking and watching porn.
There is purpose in judging the bros. But it is NOT to make them aesthetically pleasing for people watching God's people. It's not show! To act Christianese. To put on a mask where everyone is cookie-cutter shaped.
Does the sin cause harm to the church? Not those sins, that's for sure. The only difference between having it out with the porn-watched compared to anyone else, is because either the porn-watcher got caught, or was stupid enough to reveal that sin in front of the bros. Stupid, because about half the people "correcting" him/her also do it, but haven't been caught.
What does harm the church? For one thing, thinking the worst sins in the world are smoking or watching porn. If that's as shallow as the correction goes, it's time to leave that church. Because while that is happening what is causing it is all the members who think it's more important to call people on that then call them on the haughtiness that brought them to think that is the worst that can happen!
Haughtiness can destroy a church, Gossip can destroy a church. Backbiting. All things that can cause big problems in a church.
And then there is the other big stuff -- bad teachings. (Like smoking and porn-watching are the biggest demons the church faces.) WoF, the gay agenda, orgies, keeping a blind eye to cheating and abuse within the church -- any reason people will go to church other than to spend time with the Lord is the serious stuff. The stuff that needs an arm-in-arm approach with the real bros.
Look at the list of what was going on in Corinth. THAT's the bad stuff.
And then look at the list in Romans of which sins cause that. I can guarantee it wasn't smoking or porn-watching that caused those problems. But, I'm sure if they had easy access to porn or tobacco had been a middle-eastern crop, that same church would have been worrying about that stuff for appearance sake.
I think this needs to go much deeper than it has.
This statement should not be taken out of context. The context was the Law of Moses and the issue of adultery. Since the accusers could not meet the requirements, the charges were dismissed.
Apart from the fact that we should judge ourselves first, the Bible does give Christians the right to judge their fellow-believers within the context of their own church. Therefore they may even refuse fellowship with other Christians who persist in their sins. Furthermore, the local church -- through its elders -- has the right to disfellowship Christians who refuse to repent. That is in fact a judgment.
Judgment against another Christian is on the basis of whether or not that person is sinning, and the sins of the flesh and spirit are listed several times in the epistles. This judgment is basically to withdraw fellowship so that the sinning brother or sister repents and can be brought back into fellowship.
No. When two or three Christians can testify that another Christian is persisting in sinful behavior, it is not slander but judgment.
You can't separate the two. The person brings judgment upon himself by sinning.
I find it most disturbing that the big sins being brought up are smoking and watching porn.
There is purpose in judging the bros. But it is NOT to make them aesthetically pleasing for people watching God's people. It's not show! To act Christianese. To put on a mask where everyone is cookie-cutter shaped.
Does the sin cause harm to the church? Not those sins, that's for sure. The only difference between having it out with the porn-watched compared to anyone else, is because either the porn-watcher got caught, or was stupid enough to reveal that sin in front of the bros. Stupid, because about half the people "correcting" him/her also do it, but haven't been caught.
What does harm the church? For one thing, thinking the worst sins in the world are smoking or watching porn. If that's as shallow as the correction goes, it's time to leave that church. Because while that is happening what is causing it is all the members who think it's more important to call people on that then call them on the haughtiness that brought them to think that is the worst that can happen!
Haughtiness can destroy a church, Gossip can destroy a church. Backbiting. All things that can cause big problems in a church.
And then there is the other big stuff -- bad teachings. (Like smoking and porn-watching are the biggest demons the church faces.) WoF, the gay agenda, orgies, keeping a blind eye to cheating and abuse within the church -- any reason people will go to church other than to spend time with the Lord is the serious stuff. The stuff that needs an arm-in-arm approach with the real bros.
Look at the list of what was going on in Corinth. THAT's the bad stuff.
And then look at the list in Romans of which sins cause that. I can guarantee it wasn't smoking or porn-watching that caused those problems. But, I'm sure if they had easy access to porn or tobacco had been a middle-eastern crop, that same church would have been worrying about that stuff for appearance sake.
I think this needs to go much deeper than it has.
In my denomination, we are free to admit to our sins. We are free to assume everyone around us sins daily, hourly, often minutely. The warring between our two sides. We do not have to put on the happy-faced-Christian mask. Matter of fact, putting that mask on is more likely to get you noticed in a way you don't want, than openly admitting to our weaknesses.Bringing back your post again sis I couldn't help but ask. What is a little sin? What is a minor sin? If a little leaven spoils the whole then what is acceptable. What sin really doesn't matter?
Is it the conduct of the person, the image of the person, or the heart of a person, or all three. This is what I believe the Lord meant
when he said judge not least ye be judged.
If I practice sin openly yet fellowship with the saints and call myself a saint John says I'm a liar and the truth is not in me. Would you agree? Why?