I can't remember the lower number, but let's say 18,000... compared to 3,000,000, the larger number would need a much wider space to cross in the same amount of time...
How on earth would you propose to prove this?
I can't remember the lower number, but let's say 18,000... compared to 3,000,000, the larger number would need a much wider space to cross in the same amount of time...
that would not make sense. For wind just pushes water off the lnd which is right below it. it would not produce two walls of water on either side.
prove which? that 3M people need more time to cross in a narrow space than 18k? I'm not sure if I'm following you...How on earth would you propose to prove this?
there are many different kinds of winds, and if water was pushed off to make dry land there would naturally be 'walls' of water on each side. no one is suggesting that it was a normal simple wind on a flat piece of water. But in my experience God uses natural means to perform His miracles when He can. Certainly the crossing of the Jordan can be explained by natural means.
prove which? that 3M people need more time to cross in a narrow space than 18k? I'm not sure if I'm following you...
That there were only 18,000 people involved in this crossing as opposed to a much larger number.
The people never had any intention, whatsoever, of crossing the sea anywhere. Why would they aim for a particular section that might have been a little shallower than another part? They just followed the cloud or pillar of fire, and it would be in God's nature to lead them to the most (seemingly) impassable part of the sea so that they would feel hopeless, powerless, and completely trapped...... not some place where they might think, "Hum, that doesn't seem all that deep... let's give it a shot."At the time of the Exodus the Reed Sea extended much further west and it is most probable that the crossing took place somewhere near what are now the Bitter Lakes where the waters would have been shallower. We must not over-exaggerate what happened..
Hmm, so even God is "limited" as to what He can do..........good to know that one........and if it can be explained by "natural means" how is it exactly that no one has?
You guys are a real hoot!![]()
well the description 'walls of water' could mean a hundred things. It simply means that there was water on both sides. The gap had to be a large one in order for the people to cross. Possibly a mile or more wide. The account was not intended to describe how God did it. The Israelites experienced the wind, and saw a huge pathway open. They did not analyse it. Nor did they know what happened upstream and downstream. Nor do we.
I am not saying that God did not work a miracle. I am simply suggesting that it is unwise to exaggerate it. God didn't.
Remember that God did not need to use a wind. Why did He?
I love how everyone has kept strictly to the Topic of the OP...........hmm, can this be explained by physics?
How high do you think the walls of water would have to be for the depth to be sufficient to drown the entire Egyptian army and their horses when the two walls came together?
Hmm, so even God is "limited" as to what He can do..........good to know that one........and if it can be explained by "natural means" how is it exactly that no one has?
You guys are a real hoot!![]()
The people never had any intention, whatsoever, of crossing the sea anywhere. Why would they aim for a particular section that might have been a little shallower than another part? They just followed the cloud or pillar of fire, and it would be in God's nature to lead them to the most (seemingly) impassable part of the sea so that they would feel hopeless, powerless, and completely trapped...... not some place where they might think, "Hum, that doesn't seem all that deep... let's give it a shot."
How high do you think the walls of water would have to be for the depth to be sufficient to drown the entire Egyptian army and their horses when the two walls came together?
Actually a foot would do if a restricted Red sea burst through and flooded the area.
No He is not limited, but He chooses to act in His own ways. Man's ability to explain things is very limited.
It was God Who said He did it by a wind, not me
Owls are very wise. And they hoot. Maybe the owls have got it?
I'm so pleased that you know all God's thoughts. Does He get your permission before He does things? My experience is that to some extent God 'covers up' His miracles by making them seem natural.
If God did not want us to see a physical solution why did He use a wind?
there are many different kinds of winds, and if water was pushed off to make dry land there would naturally be 'walls' of water on each side. no one is suggesting that it was a normal simple wind on a flat piece of water. But in my experience God uses natural means to perform His miracles when He can. Certainly the crossing of the Jordan can be explained by natural means.