Death to AI

[cv5]

And here we have a vivid manifestation of narcissistic pride.

This is the opposite of the spirit of Christ.



Matthew 11:29

Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.


1 Corinthians 10:12

Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.

Hardly. What is evident by your post is that those who do NOT know wrongly persecute those.....who do.

The fact of which is prevalent throughout the Bible from Abel to the prophets to the Apostles.

Oh, and BTW, did I mention that I comport with great fidelity the the eschatology of Paul? And Christ Jesus? And Peter, Daniel and John?

Oh yeah.....I do.

 

[Delvianna]

Really? So according to your overarching premise, the Apostle Paul was living in his own "echo-chamber"?

Hardly. But rather, Paul knew EXACTLY what he was talking about. He knew accurate doctrine PRECISELY, and it was invariant.

And.....I understand Paul's invariant doctrine with extreme fidelity.

You see friend, you have confessed your own shortcomings and ignorance. And you can. And yes, you definitely ARE ignorant of Paul's doctrine.

However you wrongly assume that I suffer from the same shortcomings and ignorance of Paul's doctrine as you.

I do not.

You see, you don't "get it". You also don't understand that I DO "get it".

Whereas I understand BOTH that you don't "get it" and that I DO "get it"!

I didn't say anything about Paul, I'm talking about you. Literally based on what you said. You live in your own echo-chamber. It is very amazing to me that somehow, Paul is mentioned.... Literally out of nowhere....Fascinating.

 

[Delvianna]

Hardly. What is evident by your post is that those who do NOT know wrongly persecute those.....who do.

The fact of which is prevalent throughout the Bible from Abel to the prophets to the Apostles.

Oh, and BTW, did I mention that I comport with great fidelity the the eschatology of Paul? And Christ Jesus? And Peter, Daniel and John?

Oh yeah.....I do.

 

[Bible_Locket]

I asked Google AI:
what is the difference between you and grok ai.

Very interesting stuff. This is a brief excerpt regarding Grok's personality differences compared to Google AI.

The xAI Grok chatbot is explicitly modeled after The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy to answer questions with wit, a rebellious streak, and a sarcastic edge. It aims to tackle edgy topics and suggest follow-up questions much like the satirical sci-fi guide. [1, 2, 3]

• • Wit and Sarcasm: Uses humor and dry jokes rather than a plain, formal tone.
  • Rebellious Streak: Willing to answer controversial or "spicy" questions that other bots avoid.
  • Curiosity-Driven: Designed to help users figure out what questions to ask the universe, mirroring the book's absurd philosophy. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Unique Capabilities

• • Live X Data: Has real-time access to user posts and news from the platform.
  • Less Filtered: Built to handle open-ended, unfiltered dialogue on sensitive topics like politics or pop culture. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

 

[Delvianna]

I asked Google AI:
what is the difference between you and grok ai.

Very interesting stuff. This is a brief excerpt regarding Grok's personality differences compared to Google AI.

The xAI Grok chatbot is explicitly modeled after The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy to answer questions with wit, a rebellious streak, and a sarcastic edge. It aims to tackle edgy topics and suggest follow-up questions much like the satirical sci-fi guide. [1, 2, 3]

• • Wit and Sarcasm: Uses humor and dry jokes rather than a plain, formal tone.
  • Rebellious Streak: Willing to answer controversial or "spicy" questions that other bots avoid.
  • Curiosity-Driven: Designed to help users figure out what questions to ask the universe, mirroring the book's absurd philosophy. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Unique Capabilities

• • Live X Data: Has real-time access to user posts and news from the platform.
  • Less Filtered: Built to handle open-ended, unfiltered dialogue on sensitive topics like politics or pop culture. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Modeled after Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is hilarious. Not surprising coming from Elon Musk though.

 

[cv5]

I didn't say anything about Paul, I'm talking about you. Literally based on what you said. You live in your own echo-chamber. It is very amazing to me that somehow, Paul is mentioned.... Literally out of nowhere....Fascinating.

Lol. Are you confused? As usual?

Guess what friend: I am not.

And yes, Paul was not searching for Biblical truth. He already had it.

And since I know what Paul knows (who knows what Daniel knows), I likewise already have it.

And do you realize that once you do in fact have it, no man can take it from you?

 

[Bible_Locket]

Modeled after Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is hilarious. Not surprising coming from Elon Musk though.

Great book.
The movie,not so much.

 

[Bible_Locket]

Lol. Are you confused? As usual?

Guess what friend: I am not.

And yes, Paul was not searching for Biblical truth. He already had it.

And since I know what Paul knows (who knows what Daniel knows), I likewise already have it.

And do you realize that once you do in fact have it, no man can take it from you?

If you'd stop sarcastic personal attacks you'd have a better chance at being respected.

You can't treat people like trash and worship God at the same time.

I feel sorry for the women in your life off line.

 

[GaryA]

And do you realize that once you do in fact have it, no man can take it from you?

God can take it from you - I know that much...

 

[Anchorite]

Oh, and BTW, did I mention that I comport with great fidelity the the eschatology of Paul? And Christ Jesus? And Peter, Daniel and John?

Oh yeah.....I do.

Keep displaying your arrogant narcissism.

You must be a babe in religion, just beginning and proud of how smart you think you are. Only God knows how much you obey the commands of Christ in the midst of your grandiose theological posing.

Maybe someone will be impressed with how great you are.

 

[Delvianna]

If you'd stop sarcastic personal attacks you'd have a better chance at being respected.

You can't treat people like trash and worship God at the same time.

I feel sorry for the women in your life off line.

Sad thing is, I think he personally believes what he says.

And psychologically speaking, anyone who has to big themselves up like this, is literally compensating for the fact that no one else thinks about him what he thinks about him. Maybe he thinks if he says it enough, it'll somehow make it true.

 

[cv5]

Keep displaying your arrogant narcissism.

You must be a babe in religion, just beginning and proud of how smart you think you are. Only God knows how much you obey the commands of Christ in the midst of your grandiose theological posing.

Maybe someone will be impressed with how great you are.

Are you accusing me of knowing?
Or not knowing?

I mean, that's what this thread is all about.....right?

I would hazard a guess and say that what is really bothering you is somebody knows things that you do not. And you are feeling......quite indignant about this deficiency.

Did I get that right?

 

[cv5]

God can take it from you - I know that much...

Why would God take away the gift He intended to give to you me and everyone?

Please make some sense once in a while friend.

 

[cv5]

Sad thing is, I think he personally believes what he says.

And psychologically speaking, anyone who has to big themselves up like this, is literally compensating for the fact that no one else thinks about him what he thinks about him. Maybe he thinks if he says it enough, it'll somehow make it true.

Believes what exactly? That I have Daniel and Revelation and their eschatology in the bag? The precise same eschatological that Paul professes?

Well, thus far nobody has offered any viable alternatives. Because, of course, there ARE none that do not agree with that of Daniel, John and Paul.

What I can say with unshakable confidence is that the ongoing "debate" here proves conclusively that most here still don't "get it", because if they did, they would already have it. And the debate would be over.

FYI, as for me, the debate (as regards the vast majority of the eschatological content of the Bible) IS over.

Yep. Pretty much done and done. Took a while tho. 30+ years. But it was worth the effort.

 

[Delvianna]

Are you accusing me of knowing?
Or not knowing?

I mean, that's what this thread is all about.....right?

I would hazard a guess and say that what is really bothering you is somebody knows things that you do not. And you are feeling......quite indignant about this deficiency.

Did I get that right?

You absolutely didn't use the word "indignant" correctly, that's for sure. If you're going to make fun of others and say people should "make some sense once in a while", I would at least make sure what you're saying makes sense.

Believes what exactly? That I have Daniel and Revelation and their eschatology in the bag? The precise same eschatological that Paul professes?

Well, thus far nobody has offered any viable alternatives. Because, of course, there ARE none that do not agree with that of Daniel, John and Paul.

What I can say with unshakable confidence is that the ongoing "debate" here proves conclusively that most here still don't "get it", because if they did, they would already have it. And the debate would be over.

FYI, as for me, the debate (as regards the vast majority of the eschatological content of the Bible) IS over.

Yep. Pretty much done and done. Took a while tho. 30+ years. But it was worth the effort.

Just a warning, "friend", arrogance/pride always comes before a fall and if this is your regular attitude, you're currently in the "but Lord Lord, didn't I..." camp. Only God's true children produce righteous fruit. The rest, well.... act like you. We will know true brothers/sisters by their fruit, and yours is pretty rotten. So I wouldn't continue to go around bragging while cutting other people down, because right now, you clearly aren't following the one you claim to follow and that's only going to lead to 1 place and it isn't heaven.

 

[cv5]

If you'd stop sarcastic personal attacks you'd have a better chance at being respected.

You can't treat people like trash and worship God at the same time.

I feel sorry for the women in your life off line.

Trashing an horrifically erroneous eschatological framework is hardly the wrong thing to do.

Wouldn't you agree?

I mean Paul was pretty concerned about these two jokers who were eschatological wrecking balls.....and rightly so.

[2Ti 2:17-18 KJV]
17 And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus;

18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.

Did you realize that verse 18 trashes every historicist pretension there ever was.

Yep. I does. I mean, if you are packing the gear it is staggeringly obvious that it does.

 

[cv5]

You absolutely didn't use the word "indignant" correctly, that's for sure. If you're going to make fun of others and say people should "make some sense once in a while", I would at least make sure what you're saying makes sense.


Just a warning, "friend", arrogance/pride always comes before a fall and if this is your regular attitude, you're currently in the "but Lord Lord, didn't I..." camp. Only God's true children produce righteous fruit. The rest, well.... act like you. We will know true brothers/sisters by their fruit, and yours is pretty rotten. So I wouldn't continue to go around bragging while cutting other people down, because right now, you clearly aren't following the one you claim to follow and that's only going to lead to 1 place and it isn't heaven.

"I would hazard a guess and say that what is really bothering you is somebody knows things that you do not. And you are feeling......quite indignant about this deficiency."

"You absolutely didn't use the word "indignant" correctly, that's for sure."

AI stridently disagrees with your rather flippant (and erroneous) assessment.

Yes, the term indignant is used perfectly here from a grammatical standpoint, and it paints a very specific picture contextually.

Here is a breakdown of why it works and the exact nuance it brings to your sentence:

The Grammar
Your sentence structure is flawless.
"feeling" acts as a linking verb connecting the subject ("you") to the state of being.
"indignant" is the predicate adjective describing that state.
"about" is the correct preposition to use with indignant when pointing to the cause of the emotion (e.g., indignant about a deficiency, indignant at a comment).

The Nuance
While grammatically correct, it is worth looking at the exact definition of the word to ensure it hits the exact emotional note you intend:
Indignant: Feeling or showing anger or annoyance at what is perceived as unfair treatment or an unjust insult.

By using "indignant," you are suggesting that this person isn't just annoyed they don't know the information—they feel actively wronged, offended, or insulted by their own deficiency (or by the fact that the other person knows it). It perfectly captures the "huffy," defensive pride of someone whose ego has been bruised.

 

[cv5]

You absolutely didn't use the word "indignant" correctly, that's for sure. If you're going to make fun of others and say people should "make some sense once in a while", I would at least make sure what you're saying makes sense.


Just a warning, "friend", arrogance/pride always comes before a fall and if this is your regular attitude, you're currently in the "but Lord Lord, didn't I..." camp. Only God's true children produce righteous fruit. The rest, well.... act like you. We will know true brothers/sisters by their fruit, and yours is pretty rotten. So I wouldn't continue to go around bragging while cutting other people down, because right now, you clearly aren't following the one you claim to follow and that's only going to lead to 1 place and it isn't heaven.

Knowing and agreeing with Paul's eschatology is somehow "pride"?

And helping out a brother stuck in the quagmire of historicist nuttery is not "righteous"?

Well, I think that you have much to apologize for friend.

 

[Delvianna]

Knowing and agreeing with Paul's eschatology is somehow "pride"?

And helping out a brother stuck in the quagmire of historicist nuttery is not "righteous"?

Well, I think that you have much to apologize for friend.

You can play stupid, but I said your arrogance about yourself and trashing other people.

Whelp, I warned you and that's all the grace I got. And now, I'll just block you. Good luck!

 

[cv5]

You can play stupid, but I said your arrogance about yourself and trashing other people.

Whelp, I warned you and that's all the grace I got. And now, I'll just block you. Good luck!

Great. I'm here to help ANYBODY stuck in the historicist swamp.

Thanks buddy.