Can you explain the Holy Ghost?Isnt there a ghost inside you?
The Holy Ghost!
If not I suggest you ask God about that....
Can you explain the Holy Ghost?Isnt there a ghost inside you?
The Holy Ghost!
If not I suggest you ask God about that....
The problem with this is, it doesn't make sense. God created Man in His own image, and assigned to him a distinct mission. He was, in other words, told what the right thing to do is.
Man was also told what *not* to do, namely not to eat of the forbidden tree. If Man did not have a conscience he would have no basis to make a decision when tempted. But he did have a conscience, knew that he was doing wrong, and was convicted by God later for having chosen to do the wrong thing, against his conscience.
Lol
You refuse to understand the law of sacrifice could not tell us what sin is.
Once again, the ministry of death is the commands written on stone
Because as Paul and moses both said, whoever does not obey every word (every jot and tittle) is cursed.
Thats you and me.
You have to understand the law before you can teach it.
Acts 21:20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou see brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all Zealous (devoted) of the law: (The Jews kept the Law, the elders Scribes Sadducee wasn’t keeping the law)
Mark 8:31 And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and the chief priest, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.
(They we’re worried that Christ would take there place) John 11:48 If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation. (they were worried about loosing their seat and profiting off their nation.
there is only one man who kept the lawThat’s what I’m trying to tell you, in conclusion do you keep the law or not? you should be tired of running simply yes or no
That’s what I’m trying to tell you, in conclusion do you keep the law or not? you should be tired of running simply yes or no
James 2:10That’s what I’m trying to tell you, in conclusion do you keep the law or not? you should be tired of running simply yes or no
there is only one man who kept the law
You might know him, We call him the messiah or the christ.
NO ONE KEEPS THE LAW.
why do you water down the law and make yourself think you keep it like the pharisee did?
Its multiple Scriptures we can do this all day lol!James 2:10
For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all.
Who heard among us has failed to even stumble in one pont?
If you find that someone, You have fund someone who has kept the law
I only know of one man who has done it.
Its multiple Scriptures we can do this all day lol!
Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. Please give your understanding of this Scripture![/QUOTE
Here are some more verses of perfect men: Genesis 6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
Job 1:1 There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.
You should be tired of embarrassing yourself by now!
In a sense, Adam and Eve punished themselves and all of humanity because of this knowledge of good and evil. They made themselves and all of their descendants responsible for their actions. We are all under the law of conscience, knowing what is good and what is evil. That is why the law is described as a curse., for where there is no law, there is no transgression. So Adam and Eve were innocent before they ate from that tree.
The problem with man is his heart. Too much self-interest and not enough love for God and fellow man. Through Christ, our sins are erased and our hearts are filled with the needed love for God and men by the Father's Holy Spirit. It is then that we are perfected to do the Father's will : to do good and refrain from evil. We will be following the Spirit of the Law and not the letter of the law because no matter what you do or not do, if you don't have that love in your heart, it is meaningless.
Your comment makes no sense. There was no law to keep in the sense of the 10 commandments.
Abraham obeyed God, doing as God commanded. That is much different from obeying the written code. You should read the whole of Galatians. Hopefully that will clear up your misunderstanding.
And that is the difference between dead religion and a living relationship with out heavenly Father. Dead religion needs rules and regulations because there is no communication with the Living God.
Those who know their God hear from Him and are led by the Spirit. Abraham did not need laws on tablets of stone. He was God's friend. Lord Jesus is the friend of sinners. We do well to seek to befriend the Lord Jesus. And yes, when we are truly His friend, we will obey Him.
The written law is not wrong, it is useless. All it did was kill us. Thanks a lot. Everyone knows Galatians 2:20. It's a shame that they do not know the preceding verse.
19For through the law I died to the law so that I might live to God.
How can I obey the law if I'm dead to it? If I am speeding, crash my car and die, who would bother to give me a ticket? How would they enforce it?
The new covenant is new because it is new. The Law is of the old. There is now the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. Learn to live in that law and watch your life be transformed. The only thing that the OT law does is bring death. You may like to exist in death. No thanks. I know the difference. I much prefer life.
The problem is not with the law. God said that explicitly. (Deuteronomy 30). The problem is with the heart of man. Jeremiah said it best, the heart is deceitful above all things.........If I don't make sense, how does this make sense? "No law to keep in the sense of the 10 commandments?" The 10 Commandments were, in fact, laws!
I've read Galatians many times. Abraham's obedience to God was exactly the same thing as Israel's obedience to the Law of Moses. It was an opportunity to live by the word of God, and in so doing demonstrate faithfulness to God.
Yes, there was that difference that Abraham had no written code. And yet he still had the requirement of circumcision, right? It really is the same thing as existed under the Law of Moses.
As I said, the problem with the Law was not some inherent disability men had when confronted with written regulations. No, it was the fact the Law contained within it the very prohibition from the Tree of Life that Man's 1st Sin had. It was a constant reminder, even as they faithfully kept the Law, that they were disqualified from the Tree of Life, up until the time Christ bore their sins on his own tree.
Rules and regulations do not prevent people from hearing God! But yes, they can be delivered to Israel, who in turn can obey those rules and regulations without true faithfulness. I get that part of your message.
I just think it's important to note that God gave rules and regulations under the Law not to show that they couldn't keep those rules and regulations, but rather, to show that they couldn't earn eternal life by keeping them. It constantly showed or exposed their sin nature, which disqualified them from Eternal Life.
The tablets of stone were very useful at the time, and did not prevent Israel from getting God's word internally as well. That is, the purpose of the Law was not to prevent Israel from hearing God internally. Rather, these things enhanced their ability to hear internally--it just reminded them that they need legal redemption through Christ.
Rom 3.What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision? 2 Much in every way! First of all, the Jews have been entrusted with the very words of God.
It's a shame that in one fell swoop you've disqualified and disrespected the entirety of Psalm 119. There, David sang the praises of the Law of God with every verse! He would hardly do that if it was useless. You either reject David and the entire OT Scriptures, or you are plainly misinterpreting Galatians and Paul's theology!
But I've heard this many times from Christians, who quote it and don't fully understand it. They have trouble putting the two testaments together. We aren't under the Law not because it wasn't good, nor because we weren't Israel. Rather, we are not under the Law any longer because Christ has already provided the legal redemption the Law indicated was necessary for Eternal Salvation.
The Law was "useless" only in terms of providing Eternal Salvation. It was not useless in preparing for it to come when Jesus died on the cross. Moral living was as necessary then as it is now, even though Christ has already died for our sin.
What does "dying to the Law" mean? It means that we acknowledge that our morality is insufficient apart from Christ's redemption. We require submission to his perfect righteousness, and not to any other system, which would be inadequate.
I've never said anybody is still under the Law! Once Christ died, then we could die with him so that we may also rise with him. He was our ticket past the condemnation of the Law. He sustained our righteous works through death simply by our casting our lot with him.
You must not understand my points. I've *never* said anybody is still under the Law! What I've said is that when the Law was in effect people were able to live by it. That's what God Himself said!
Deut 32.47 They are not just idle words for you—they are your life.
If I don't make sense, how does this make sense? "No law to keep in the sense of the 10 commandments?" The 10 Commandments were, in fact, laws!
I've read Galatians many times. Abraham's obedience to God was exactly the same thing as Israel's obedience to the Law of Moses. It was an opportunity to live by the word of God, and in so doing demonstrate faithfulness to God.
Yes, there was that difference that Abraham had no written code. And yet he still had the requirement of circumcision, right? It really is the same thing as existed under the Law of Moses.
As I said, the problem with the Law was not some inherent disability men had when confronted with written regulations. No, it was the fact the Law contained within it the very prohibition from the Tree of Life that Man's 1st Sin had. It was a constant reminder, even as they faithfully kept the Law, that they were disqualified from the Tree of Life, up until the time Christ bore their sins on his own tree.
Rules and regulations do not prevent people from hearing God! But yes, they can be delivered to Israel, who in turn can obey those rules and regulations without true faithfulness. I get that part of your message.
I just think it's important to note that God gave rules and regulations under the Law not to show that they couldn't keep those rules and regulations, but rather, to show that they couldn't earn eternal life by keeping them. It constantly showed or exposed their sin nature, which disqualified them from Eternal Life.
The tablets of stone were very useful at the time, and did not prevent Israel from getting God's word internally as well. That is, the purpose of the Law was not to prevent Israel from hearing God internally. Rather, these things enhanced their ability to hear internally--it just reminded them that they need legal redemption through Christ.
Rom 3.What advantage, then, is there in being a Jew, or what value is there in circumcision? 2 Much in every way! First of all, the Jews have been entrusted with the very words of God.
It's a shame that in one fell swoop you've disqualified and disrespected the entirety of Psalm 119. There, David sang the praises of the Law of God with every verse! He would hardly do that if it was useless. You either reject David and the entire OT Scriptures, or you are plainly misinterpreting Galatians and Paul's theology!
But I've heard this many times from Christians, who quote it and don't fully understand it. They have trouble putting the two testaments together. We aren't under the Law not because it wasn't good, nor because we weren't Israel. Rather, we are not under the Law any longer because Christ has already provided the legal redemption the Law indicated was necessary for Eternal Salvation.
The Law was "useless" only in terms of providing Eternal Salvation. It was not useless in preparing for it to come when Jesus died on the cross. Moral living was as necessary then as it is now, even though Christ has already died for our sin.
What does "dying to the Law" mean? It means that we acknowledge that our morality is insufficient apart from Christ's redemption. We require submission to his perfect righteousness, and not to any other system, which would be inadequate.
I've never said anybody is still under the Law! Once Christ died, then we could die with him so that we may also rise with him. He was our ticket past the condemnation of the Law. He sustained our righteous works through death simply by our casting our lot with him.
You must not understand my points. I've *never* said anybody is still under the Law! What I've said is that when the Law was in effect people were able to live by it. That's what God Himself said!
Deut 32.47 They are not just idle words for you—they are your life.
Your comment makes no sense. There was no law to keep in the sense of the 10 commandments. Abraham obeyed God, doing as God commanded. That is much different from obeying the written code. You should read the whole of Galatians. Hopefully that will clear up your misunderstanding.
And that is the difference between dead religion and a living relationship with out heavenly Father. Dead religion needs rules and regulations because there is no communication with the Living God. Those who know their God hear from Him and are led by the Spirit. Abraham did not need laws on tablets of stone. He was God's friend. Lord Jesus is the friend of sinners. We do well to seek to befriend the Lord Jesus. And yes, when we are truly His friend, we will obey Him.
The written law is not wrong, it is useless. All it did was kill us. Thanks a lot. Everyone knows Galatians 2:20. It's a shame that they do not know the preceding verse.
19For through the law I died to the law so that I might live to God.
How can I obey the law if I'm dead to it? If I am speeding, crash my car and die, who would bother to give me a ticket? How would they enforce it?
The new covenant is new because it is new. The Law is of the old. There is now the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus. Learn to live in that law and watch your life be transformed. The only thing that the OT law does is bring death. You may like to exist in death. No thanks. I know the difference. I much prefer life.
Its multiple Scriptures we can do this all day lol!
Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. Please give your understanding of this Scripture!
Its multiple Scriptures we can do this all day lol!
Revelation 22:14 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. Please give your understanding of this Scripture!