What he means is "this is laughable and loudly so". What he really means is that he is rolling on the floor laughing.
We don't know if that is justified or not, but there it is.
Well no I don't mean any disrespect to anyone.
What he means is "this is laughable and loudly so". What he really means is that he is rolling on the floor laughing.
We don't know if that is justified or not, but there it is.
I notice that if speaking about Revelation 11:1 that it has become natural for those who adhere to one camp's thinking to approach it as towards proof that the Revelation was given before ad70. At the same time when speaking about it from another camp's motivation it is usually explained in a manner to show proof it was written after ad70.
To me though I see it as if he is being told he must prophecy again as if it had already been prophesied and so look for it elsewhere in the Bible. I notice that in Zechariah 1,2,3,4. ect. that there are the many of the same things spoken of ,flying scroll/little book,lamps/witnesses,,temple ect. as are found in these chapters of Revelation. And so I notice that the opposing camps have their interest in this but I see it as though John is being given additional information in Revelation about what is in Zechariah.
That OK. Some statements on Christian forum are indeed laughable -- absurd. Not sure if it applied to your discussions on this thread, but a lot of iinterpretations of Bible prophecy are absurd. Such as Preterism which is pure fantasy.Well no I don't mean any disrespect to anyone.
In Ezekiel 2:8-10 thru 3:1-3 we have a similar scripture where Ezekiel is told to eat the scroll, which is figurative of the word of God as food. For after he eats the scroll Ezekiel is told to go to the house of Israel and speak God's words to them. It is the same here with John. When the angel says, "You must prophesy again before many peoples, nations, languages and kings." I don't believe that the word "again" is in reference to the book or Revelation having been previously prophesied about, but is referring to the fact that John prophesied about the word of God before he was banished to the island of Patmos and that he was not going to remain in exiled and would have opportunity to prophesy to peoples, nations, languages and kings about all of this information contained in the book of Revelation.
That OK. Some statements on Christian forum are indeed laughable -- absurd. Not sure if it applied to your discussions on this thread, but a lot of iinterpretations of Bible prophecy are absurd. Such as Preterism which is pure fantasy.
That OK. Some statements on Christian forum are indeed laughable -- absurd. Not sure if it applied to your discussions on this thread, but a lot of iinterpretations of Bible prophecy are absurd. Such as Preterism which is pure fantasy.
That is what the natural man would say. The spiritual man would say that that is a metaphor for bringing divine judgments upon the earth -- calling down fire from Heaven. In Revelation 11 there are metaphors as well as realities. And they can be easily distinguished.What's even more laughable and fantasy is believing there are two prophets with asbestos lips with fire coming out of their mouths.
What's even more laughable and fantasy is believing there are two prophets with asbestos lips with fire coming out of their mouths.
That is what the natural man would say. The spiritual man would say that that is a metaphor for bringing divine judgments upon the earth -- calling down fire from Heaven. In Revelation 11 there are metaphors as well as realities. And they can be easily distinguished.
garee, you manage to convert every Bible truth into a parable. That is neither biblical nor true. A parable represents something else. But everything in Scripture does NOT represent something else. GOD IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION.Yes interesting parable..
In Ezekiel 2:8-10 thru 3:1-3 we have a similar scripture where Ezekiel is told to eat the scroll, which is figurative of the word of God as food. For after he eats the scroll Ezekiel is told to go to the house of Israel and speak God's words to them. It is the same here with John. When the angel says, "You must prophesy again before many peoples, nations, languages and kings." I don't believe that the word "again" is in reference to the book or Revelation having been previously prophesied about, but is referring to the fact that John prophesied about the word of God before he was banished to the island of Patmos and that he was not going to remain in exiled and would have opportunity to prophesy to peoples, nations, languages and kings about all of this information contained in the book of Revelation.
Use your imagination. A simple phenomenon for God to enable.What's even more laughable and fantasy is believing there are two prophets with asbestos lips with fire coming out of their mouths.
No. You are suggesting that Bible interpretation is arbitrary. That is not so. We are given sufficient evidence to determine what is a metaphor and what is not. And we are also required to take all Scripture into account. So let's focus on Revelation 11.So things are literal when you want them to be and metaphors when they are not literal - got it.
What's even more laughable and fantasy is believing there are two prophets with asbestos lips with fire coming out of their mouths.
So things are literal when you want them to be and metaphors when they are not literal - got it.
garee, you manage to convert every Bible truth into a parable. That is neither biblical nor true. A parable represents something else. But everything in Scripture does NOT represent something else. GOD IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION.
There is nothing parabolic about Revelation 11. Indeed Revelation 11, 12, and 13 are all revelations of things which will occur during the 3 1/2 year reign of the Antichrist (the Beast of Revelation 13)