All men = all nations including women, not just Jews any more as in the OT.
Are all nations saved and come to the knowledge of the truth? Are all kings? All that are in authority?
All men = all nations including women, not just Jews any more as in the OT.
Well as I have told you free will is not a biblical concept, and "universal atonement" meaning that Jesus bore the sins of all humanity in no way denies God's Grace.
Actually, it affirms God's great love for all people and His desire that all would be persuaded to receive His great gift of salvation.
That people can be persuaded in no way diminishes the sovereignty of God which is something apparently people who follow Calvin's ideas cannot seem to grasp.
Inherent in the very concept of sovereignty is the power of the Sovereign to allow, guide, pursue and sometimes compel, and He acts in many different ways because He is all-knowing and we are not.
“For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;” 1 Timothy 2:2–3 (KJV 1900)Are all nations saved and come to the knowledge of the truth? Are all kings? All that are in authority?
Free Will = law in the OT. Grace cannot exist where free will does.Free will is not a Biblical concept? Then why does God present people with choices so often? Why did He lay before the Israelites the choice between life and death if there was no free will ability to accomplish it?
The Augustinian concept of the bondage of the will is not Biblical, though his characterization of Pelagius as forwarding that man is basically good and capable of self-salvation is also not Biblical. We sell ourselves into sin willingly, and THAT makes us slaves.
The issue, though, is that Calvinists and Catholics both teach a doctrine of man in their conception of original sin which came via Augustine and an unfortunate latin translation of Romans 5. The church would be so much better served if it read Jerome, Justin Martyr, and John Cassian on free will rather than placing so much into the writings of Augustine.
Free will is not a Biblical concept? Then why does God present people with choices so often? Why did He lay before the Israelites the choice between life and death if there was no free will ability to accomplish it?
The Augustinian concept of the bondage of the will is not Biblical, though his characterization of Pelagius as forwarding that man is basically good and capable of self-salvation is also not Biblical. We sell ourselves into sin willingly, and THAT makes us slaves.
The issue, though, is that Calvinists and Catholics both teach a doctrine of man in their conception of original sin which came via Augustine and an unfortunate latin translation of Romans 5. The church would be so much better served if it read Jerome, Justin Martyr, and John Cassian on free will rather than placing so much into the writings of Augustine.
Did you ever read Luther's Bondage of the Will? It cannot be proven wrong, only rejected.Choice yes... Free will no
"Free will" is philosophical school of thought developed by the ancient Greeks
Augustine was wrong too on the bondage of the will.
He infused his own personal failings into the understanding of scripture... Agree
“For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;” 1 Timothy 2:2–3 (KJV 1900)
“All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.” John 6:37 (KJV 1900)
“All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.” John 6:37 (KJV 1900)You forgot verse 4, who will have all men be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth. Don’t privately interpret this to mean all kinds of men.
Choice yes... Free will no
"Free will" is philosophical school of thought developed by the ancient Greeks
Augustine was wrong too on the bondage of the will.
He infused his own personal failings into the understanding of scripture... Agree
Will to be perfect.Choice is all that's required for free will. Now, if someone were to argue that they were free from any constraints then yeah that's not Biblical or rational but that's not how free will is commonly understood. We really have the choice whether to follow God or not, free from coercion. We just don't left to our own devices, but the capacity is there.
Did you ever read Luther's Bondage of the Will? It cannot be proven wrong, only rejected.
You cannot perceive that God does not love all mankind. Heb 12:6, For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every soul whom he receiveth. It would then stand to reason that, if there are some that he does not chasten, then he does not love them.Well as I have told you free will is not a biblical concept, and "universal atonement" meaning that Jesus bore the sins of all humanity in no way denies God's Grace.
Actually, it affirms God's great love for all people and His desire that all would be persuaded to receive His great gift of salvation.
That people can be persuaded in no way diminishes the sovereignty of God which is something apparently people who follow Calvin's ideas cannot seem to grasp.
Inherent in the very concept of sovereignty is the power of the Sovereign to allow, guide, pursue and sometimes compel, and He acts in many different ways because He is all-knowing and we are not.
Choice is all that's required for free will. Now, if someone were to argue that they were free from any constraints then yeah that's not Biblical or rational but that's not how free will is commonly understood. We really have the choice whether to follow God or not, free from coercion. We just don't left to our own devices, but the capacity is there.
A cat cannot be persuaded to be a dog. But if God were to change one into a dog, as he does sinners into saints, no persuasion is necessary.I will add it to my list.
I can state this much as I have already mentioned to you... belief will occur after we are persuaded, convicted, convinced..... these are a passive reaction to hearing truth. We cannot will being persuaded.
Prove that we are incapable of being persuaded... then you may have an argument, but you cannot.
We both know we are fully persuaded of many things day in and day out .... for one you are persuaded of the five points of Calvinism.
Have you given all your savings to the poor? Do you have a gun? How about impure thoughts? And evil imaginations?I do, that's why I follow Jesus.
I would state no... free will means the exercise of choice without any determinants/determinism at any point in a person's life.
That is not reality.
Have you given all your savings to the poor? Do you have a gun? How about impure thoughts? And evil imaginations?
If you have free will, choose to be perfect.Your questions indicate you may not recognize what righteousness is, and have missed the point of Jesus ladling on such strict requirements for perfection.
A cat cannot be persuaded to be a dog. But if God were to change one into a dog, as he does sinners into saints, no persuasion is necessary.