NOT EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO WHAT I MEANT BY WHAT I SAID.
Genuine born again Christians are saved from the MOMENT the Holy Spirit puts that Saving Faith in us,
Your one of those long posters... lets start here, book chapter verse please.
NOT EVEN REMOTELY CLOSE TO WHAT I MEANT BY WHAT I SAID.
Genuine born again Christians are saved from the MOMENT the Holy Spirit puts that Saving Faith in us,
Which verses?
Gal 1: [SUP]7 [/SUP]which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. [SUP]8 [/SUP]But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. [SUP]9 [/SUP]As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed.
accursed has the same meaning as damned.
a work of merit would be any work which merits a reward or wage.
Not just the law of moses.
Galatians 1:6-9 and the gospel of a different kind they were preaching chapter 3:1-5
Correct, but the "works" Paul refers to in Eph. 2 is the "Law of Moses",
Romans 3:27 (NKJV)
[SUP]27 [/SUP]Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faith.
"law of faith" ? if there is law, there must be obedience, therefore obedience is what justifies,
Romans 4:2 (NKJV)
[SUP]2 [/SUP]For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God.
Abraham was justified by faith, obedient to God, and obedience is a work.
No,Paul replied that what they preached differed so greatly from the true gospel that it was no gospel at all.
He could not even allow them the name gospel. [Paul preached salvation by grace through faith (Eph. 2:8), they preached salvation by the law through works, saying, It is needful to circumcise them, and to charge them to keep the law of Moses or they cannot be saved (Acts 15:1, 5); the two are incompatible, and are antagonistic to that end (Rom. 11:6).
At the very beginning he closes the door against compromise, and throughout the epistle this attitude is maintained. Obedience to their teaching puts in bondage (2:4) and entanglement (5:1), and could not result in justification (2:16), or freedom (5:1); it made Christ to be of no profit (5:2), and the death of Christ, which is the essence of the gospel, a superfluous thing of no account (2:21); and so far from bringing blessing it puts him under a curse (3:10); and all who accepted it fell away from grace (5:4).]
only there are some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.—Those who troubled them with false teachings perverted the gospel of Christ. Christ died to redeem all nations from sin. It was a perversion of the gospel to claim that they could not be saved by Christ save through keeping the Jewish law. It was turning them from a sole reliance in Christ back to the Jewish law.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach unto you any gospel other than that which we preached unto you, let him be anathema.—Paul's claim was that the gospel as he had preached it was complete, absolute, and final, and if he himself, or even an angel from heaven, should preach another gospel than that he had preached, let him be accursed.
![]()
No,
He said their gospel was different in type. But was not a replacement.
He said anyone who taught a gospel which was different than what he taught. that would be any.
And why is their gospel so different than yours?
They taught works. You teach works. They taught religion ceremony( Circumcision), So do you (baptism) They taught salvation was not eternal. As do you.
Your gospel is not very different at all. The terms may have changed, but the meaning is the same
And your gospel of works through water baptism is different how? (other than the fact no woman could be baptized, and there was no blood involved, it is still done by the work and hands of men)
Yep.
You and I teach different gospels. One of us is accursed.
I don't teach anything, just quote scripture. Mirrors are amazing.
lol.
anyone can quote scripture and make it say anythign they want.
You teach your works based gospel. by posting verses which support your view. however you ignore all the scripture which does not support your view.
thats called selective reading.
Paul never mentioned the law in Eph.
Your adding to the word of God. That is frowned upon.
In Eph He said not of works. lest any one should boast.
You telling me you can't boast about all your good works (even outside the law)
He said the same thing in romans 4 concernign abraham. and there was no law in abrahams time. so he coul not mean works of thew law
You have proven that by your own examplelol.
anyone can quote scripture and make it say anythign they want.
You teach your works based gospel. by posting verses which support your view. however you ignore all the scripture which does not support your view.
thats called selective reading.
Paul did mention the Law in Ehp. the "works" meaning the "Jewish Law".
Ephesians 2:9 (NKJV)
[SUP]9 [/SUP]not of works, lest anyone should boast.
You have proven that by your own example
No, you twist your scripture (Like Eph. 2:9) to make it any works, when it means the Jewish Law, you have to so you can justify your man made doctrine otherwise James makes your house of cards fall, you folks would love it if the book of James never made it into the canon
Your remarks are false. How can you argue with scripture? I never see you quoting scripture.. Unless YOU are twisting it.
Your remarks are false. How can you argue with scripture? I never see you quoting scripture.. Unless YOU are twisting it.
You have proven that by your own example
No, you twist your scripture (Like Eph. 2:9) to make it any works, when it means the Jewish Law, you have to so you can justify your man made doctrine otherwise James makes your house of cards fall, you folks would love it if the book of James never made it into the canon
Thats funny
I never see you post scripture unless you are twisting it
And I see you ignore alot of scripture.
This is turning into an argument...sorry if I offended you, Brother. I am passionate about the "truth" as I read it.
No,
He said their gospel was different in type. But was not a replacement.
He said anyone who taught a gospel which was different than what he taught. that would be any.
And why is their gospel so different than yours?
They taught works. You teach works. They taught religion ceremony( Circumcision), So do you (baptism) They taught salvation was not eternal. As do you.
Your gospel is not very different at all. The terms may have changed, but the meaning is the same
And your gospel of works through water baptism is different how?
Baptism is done by disciples, commanded by Christ:(other than the fact no woman could be baptized, and there was no blood involved, it is still done by the work and hands of men)
Yep.
You and I teach different gospels. One of us is accursed.