Where is the compassion,the love that Jesus had when he said "these things must come to pass"......
Yes, bc of these troubles the world must face does not mean we turn a blind eye nor a hard heart. I do not think this has been done at the expense of the destruction & lives lost.
I see compassion & concern in this thread not a yippee our time is almost over!
You are obviously confused, I didn't say that Jesus did.The lost are dying all the day long @ZNP .
God has NO pleasure in the death of the unsaved, so should we?
Your compassion or lack thereof speaks VERY LOUDLY of your heart!
Is it our place to judge hearts or say what is in just recompense in todays
world ?
Does NOT THE RAIN FALL ON THE JUST & THE UNJUST ALIKE?
You are obviously confused, I didn't say that Jesus did.
What I will say is "Amen Lord".
Random, no book, no chapter ,no verse NO MORE RESPONSE!4 Or those eighteen, upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, and killed them, think ye that they were [a]offenders above all the men that dwell in Jerusalem? 5 I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.
What happened in Turkey is a warning to everyone. When the sixth seal is opened there will be a great earthquake, much bigger than this one. The warning is very clear, we are all sinners, and we will all perish. There is salvation only in the name of Jesus.Lol ok then.
You however quoted it for a reason,either back it up or .....well you know the rest!
Random, no book, no chapter ,no verse NO MORE RESPONSE!
Last contact, I abhor the arrogant!
How do you feel about the impatient?Lol ok then.
You however quoted it for a reason,either back it up or .....well you know the rest!
Random, no book, no chapter ,no verse NO MORE RESPONSE!
Last contact, I abhor the arrogant!
This is a Christian forum, it is reasonable to assume people on this forum are familiar with the gospels.Random, no book, no chapter ,no verse NO MORE RESPONSE!
Last contact, I abhor the arrogant!
EARTHQUAKE FREQUENCY OVER TIMEOf course this is part of the foretold prophecies. First we are told there will be earthquakes in diverse places. At the time of Jesus you would not hear about the vast majority of earthquakes in diverse places, so the fact that we are watching this catastrophe that is 15,000 miles away in real time and sending aid workers is a fulfillment. Also the USGS website which lists every earthquake around the globe is a fulfillment. Also the fact that the number of the earthquakes has increased 1,000% in the last 70 years is the fulfillment of comparing the earthquakes to birth pains which will increase in both frequency and intensity.
The UN has reported that when it is all said and done they may discover as many as 100,000 have died.
Already 17,000 are confirmed dead. The stock market has been closed for a week. This will cause the total collapse of Turkey and Syria.
In the last week we have had 441 earthquakes worldwide of 2.5 or greater magnitude.
The same week in 1950 we had 15 earthquakes worldwide of 2.5 or greater magnitude.
This is why I just go back to 1950. One Seismometer will record any earthquake in about 65% of the Earth. So if you put them throughout the US from Maine and Alaska in the North to Hawaii, Guam, Florida and Puerto Rico in the South would be able to register earthquakes pretty much anywhere in the world. However, after the discovery of nuclear weapons all the nuclear powers carefully monitored seismometers to detect earthquakes. Russia, China, UK, France and the US all were carefully monitoring for any seismic activity since 1950.EARTHQUAKE FREQUENCY OVER TIME
If we chart known earthquakes from 1900 to the present day, it appears that dramatically more earthquakes are happening. However, this is misleading: for the first half of the 1900s, we were not recording small or moderate earthquakes, nor did we have enough seismic monitoring stations to record earthquakes worldwide.
The number of monitoring stations has proliferated over the past 60 years, leading to significantly more records of seismic activity. For example, the Southern California Seismic Network grew from 20 seismic monitoring stations in 1960 to nearly 400 in 2010. The International Seismological Centre shows all the current international registry of stations:
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/browse/significant.php?year=1940This is why I just go back to 1950. One Seismometer will record any earthquake in about 65% of the Earth. So if you put them throughout the US from Maine and Alaska in the North to Hawaii, Guam, Florida and Puerto Rico in the South would be able to register earthquakes pretty much anywhere in the world. However, after the discovery of nuclear weapons all the nuclear powers carefully monitored seismometers to detect earthquakes. Russia, China, UK, France and the US all were carefully monitoring for any seismic activity since 1950.
Also, major universities around the world and research centers and US military bases (which are on all 7 continents) have these seismometers.
I decided to redo this to eliminate the confusion this post may have made. Whether you have 1 or 400 seismic seismometers in Southern California it won't make much difference in detecting earthquakes around the world. The way we, and Russia, and China, and Uk, and France, and the UN, and Israel, India, Pakistan all monitor nuclear tests is with seismometers. Having 400 in Southern California will not detect more earthquakes than having 1 seismometer would.The number of monitoring stations has proliferated over the past 60 years, leading to significantly more records of seismic activity. For example, the Southern California Seismic Network grew from 20 seismic monitoring stations in 1960 to nearly 400 in 2010. The International Seismological Centre shows all the current international registry of stations:
Significant earthquakes are definitely not a valid measure of whether or not the Earth is having more earthquakes. They take into account how many people felt it. 70% of the Earth's surface is the ocean. As population increases you expect to get more earthquakes that people feel.
probably, they certainly had the motive, however this technology is not something I can confirm, other than there are people who claim they know it is for real.For crying out loud! This Turkish Leader makes an extremely strong case that this was in fact a geological weapon that was used against her land.
Earthquake Speech
Is this Haarp?
I don't know either about that method.probably, they certainly had the motive, however this technology is not something I can confirm, other than there are people who claim they know it is for real.
How do you feel about the impatient?