so if a person doesn't detect something you are saying it may be that they are not properly equipped to detect that thing?
Einstein Was Wrong !
- Thread starter cv5
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
so if a person doesn't detect something you are saying it may be that they are not properly equipped to detect that thing?
the photoelectric effect isn't real?
smoke detectors, CRT televisions, digital cameras, light meters, solar panels -- none of this stuff actually exists?
maybe you exaggerate
I will limit myself to gravity and relativity. The photoelectric effect is after all....electric.the photoelectric effect isn't real?
smoke detectors, CRT televisions, digital cameras, light meters, solar panels -- none of this stuff actually exists?
maybe you exaggerate
i happen to have a relatively lightweight but very strong cylindrical magnet in front of me.
i set it on a surface with negligible friction. it became aligned north-south by the application of some outside force that i did not supply.
then i dropped it.
it accelerated downward. only after the motion in the z direction had ceased did it become aligned north-south again.
i'd say this evidence is at least inconclusive regarding your hypothesis.
therefore your hypothesis is falsified?
little help please -- is that how science works?
"posthuman, post: 3778851, member: 170505"]i happen to have a relatively lightweight but very strong cylindrical magnet in front of me.
i set it on a surface with negligible friction. it became aligned north-south by the application of some force.
then i dropped it.
it accelerated downward. only after the motion in the z direction had ceased did it become aligned north-south again.
i'd say this evidence is at least inconclusive regarding your hypothesis.
therefore your hypothesis is falsified?
little help please -- is that how science works? [/QUOTE]
We are done here buddy. Do your research. You think the world is billions of years old that is your problem not mine. I know better. When you actually post some useful information I will respond. Like for example this.....
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23301-planck-shows-almost-perfect-cosmos-plus-axis-of-evil/
Buh bye.
i set it on a surface with negligible friction. it became aligned north-south by the application of some force.
then i dropped it.
it accelerated downward. only after the motion in the z direction had ceased did it become aligned north-south again.
i'd say this evidence is at least inconclusive regarding your hypothesis.
therefore your hypothesis is falsified?
little help please -- is that how science works? [/QUOTE]
We are done here buddy. Do your research. You think the world is billions of years old that is your problem not mine. I know better. When you actually post some useful information I will respond. Like for example this.....
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23301-planck-shows-almost-perfect-cosmos-plus-axis-of-evil/
Buh bye.
Come back after 3 months of intensive research genius. Then we will have something to chat about. Over and out.
My physics training is igh school physics and most of what I know of Einstein is from documentaries.
That being said his special relativity thought experiment does not make sense to me as I have heard and seen it explained. If you travel away from a clock at tge speed of light wouldn't all the light reach you if you stopped and you would be at the same time as the clock? If you cannot see tge clicknthat would not change the passing of timw
That being said his special relativity thought experiment does not make sense to me as I have heard and seen it explained. If you travel away from a clock at tge speed of light wouldn't all the light reach you if you stopped and you would be at the same time as the clock? If you cannot see tge clicknthat would not change the passing of timw
Typing on my phone. So sorry. And this app does not fit well. I do not worship Einstein for one thing. He is however undoubtedly incorrect. Hawking was hawking black holes until the day he died, all that effort in vain.Got to love someone ripping Einstein and at the same time misspelling 4 words, leaving out correct punctuation and butchering the English language.........HAHAHA LOVE IT
So it goes with unbelievers.
That battle has been fought, and won. Decisively. You have to work at it. Watching from the peanut gallery does no good at all. Did you check the math in the video I posted? Can you?
Hawking never impressed me and not that I worship Einstein either, but he was not incorrect on everything........and I will add.....he published THEORIES which cannot be labeled as facts...........One thing I liked was his view on light and the speed of light....interesting truths....
God is (be verb) light and dwells in light<--he is also called the lofty one that inhabits eternity.
It is a proven fact that time slows the faster one goes by experimental knowledge.....and I find it interesting that when the speed of light is hit, time stops.....
God being light and dwelling in light dwells in a permanent state of timeless eternity......just a point to ponder.
And no need to apologize to me......I was finding it humorous is all........and make no mistake....I am "no English grammerian"
Relativity indicates that the "time" on a mountaintop is slower than time at sea level....AND IT ACCUMULATES. Utter rubbish The problem? Atomic clocks. Do your homework on that and get back to me.
Pls back up the thread and see the links that I posted. And review them. Also the links I posted later...the youtube video walking through the equations. Then take a year or two and study the rest. Einstein is undoubtedly wrong.
The theories are obsolete.
No offence...this s a bible discussion site and too be honest, your flippant, mouthy remarks that you have made while lifting yourself up above everyone while thinking you know something is a little like bloviated blather..............and to take it one step further....I could care less about Einstein and or your personal vendetta against him like you are all that and a bag of chips when it comes to knowledge and or thinking in your ind that you are smarter than anyone in particular.....
So......blather away pal......