That's a shame. Aren't you being a bit sensitive. You should consider what he said about disproving hypothess. A hypothesis might be true but another variable is interfering. Scientists generally do not change their dogma without evidence like a grand theory that becomes popular. There is no evidence for the multiverse that I know of but it is not universally accepted either.
The apologetics aspect is appealing. I wonder, though, for the time investment if better approach to reach atheists might be just share the gospel without arguing science, show love, pray for their sick grandma ir ither beefs and ket them see Gid answer prayer, etc. But if you can do science apolegetics as a tool to open people to the gospel more power to you.
It s funny what wins people. I sawa video Chinese people were using, a video about ancient Chinese poetry and an ancient word for enpoer meaning the one chosen y God or with wisdom from God. It seemed pointless for evangelism from an American perspective but the idea that believing in God is Chinese might be a useful apologetic for a Chinese atheist
This guy I met in a church service once told me that God would use me to reach atheists. I think it had to do with college campuses. I will have to look and see if I took notes. If physics would help evangelism, I am open.
But I know I am mot a physicist and I o not like being pretentious. I have the letters after my name from another field and I feel I have all the more of a duty not to feign expertise.
