EMF's and EMR's and your Lap top and cell phones.

[JosephsDreams]

I would strongly suggest that if one can afford it, buy the DefenderPad for your computer.
Below is the link. I don't own this company or have any stake in it.

Lap tops are producing low level electro magnetic radiation, and also emit radiation from radio frequency waves, among other harm.
When not in use, keep your cell at least 2 feet away from you.
Sleep with your lap top at least 5 to 6 feet away from you.
Ear buds transmit more radiation to your brain and body then just holding the phone up to your ear, which is also harmful
There are ear buds available that reduce the radiation damage.
There is a lot more information on Bruce Evans site. It's a treasure trove for anyone interested.
Here is the link to the site
EHS friendly housing and accommodation

Here is the link to the DefenderPad seller.
https://www.amazon.com/DefenderPad-...F8&qid=1483714012&sr=8-1&keywords=defenderpad

 

[oldethennew]

thanks for the share JD,

we don't have a 'lap-top or cell-phone, but if we did, we would sure appreciate
the info!

 

[mar09]

Thanks. Been hearing and reading about this, but have not many words nor time to talk/write abt it. So i strive to turn off the cp at night, wc i use as a watch and alarm clock as well when i do not wake up ahead of the alarm=). (That means waking up earlier and turning it on middle of the night however ha2.)

 

[William86]

[video=youtube;wQmnztyXwVA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQmnztyXwVA&list=PL772556F1EFC4D01C&index= 23[/video]

 

[JosephsDreams]

[video=youtube;wQmnztyXwVA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQmnztyXwVA&list=PL772556F1EFC4D01C&index= 23[/video]

Here we go. Even sooner then expected.
If this video represents what you believe, you need to do some more research. Go to Bruce Evans site.

 

[William86]

Well a person who is directly selling and profiting from the sale of electromagnetic radiation detection devices and electromagnetic shielding is not exactly an unbiased source of information. The fact is you have made a claim, what is the best evidence you can offer to support this claim? How can the possibility of false positives or selective publishing of positive results be accounted for? If a study is performed that yields a null result, do you consider that result to be as significant as a study that yields a positive result? Once a study is found that yields a positive result, has that study been replicated? What is it's replication rate exactly? These are the kinds of things that would be required to establish to a high degree of certainty that such a claim is true. The problem is further compounded when you take into account the extremely high rate of unreplicable results obtained in cancer research studies and the tendency of scientific journals to not publish negative results.

Furthermore, do you consider electromagnetic radiation in the visible spectrum to be linked to higher rates of cancer? It has a considerably higher frequency than microwave or radio wave radiation, and as I'm sure you know, photon energy increases as frequency increases. It is quite easy to reliably demonstrate the link between the highest frequency light waves and cancer in a person. How do risks associated with UV exposure from sunlight compare to the cancer rates that have been found in cell phone studies? Also what is your source of information for the idea "Ear buds transmit more radiation to your brain and body then just holding the phone up to your ear." For one thing the frequency would be very different because speakers, and that's all an earbud really is a tiny speaker, are not radio/microwave devices.

 

[JosephsDreams]

I am not selling anything. And just because someone is doesn't mean that they are scamming. That is a very cynical attitude, BTW. I am not even going to get into this any further with you. One thing I learned on this site is that despite it being a Christian niche, it is not much different then what I experienced IRW when I was counseling. I thought it would be a higher level here, but it is generally not. It reaches across the spectrum, as IRL. Some arguments are just not worth taking up. My time is to valuable. Your post just proves the cliche that ignorance is bliss. Or talking about being cynical maybe you have a financial stake in in the opposing stance.
Regardless, you need not worry about me jamming up your replies. I won't be involved in this. You can continue to post your pseudo scientific mumble jumble rants without fear of being proven wrong.
Carry on.

 

[William86]

Hey, I never thought for a second you were trying to make any money on this yourself. I was talking about Bruce Evans and the site you had linked in your original post. When I went there I saw products being sold related to all this, but now that I look at it again I see that he is just giving links to other people selling this stuff and doesn't seem to be selling products himself. So, I do apologize for saying that, was my mistake. It's not even that I think people selling these products are scamming people, I think they sincerely believe it is helping people.

If you or others on here want to take some extra precautions with EM-fields, that's fine, does not make me think any less of you as a person. You're not hurting anyone by doing that and honestly I do think it's a subject that deserves to be studied further. I see the current data available as being inconclusive either way right now, but I know this is an issue the public is concerned about and rightly so. My intention was simply to let people hear the other side of the argument and I've done that so please feel free to continue with your thread, I won't be trying to disrupt it. Wish you the best brother.