check out this commentary series:
https://guides.library.duke.edu/c.php?g=289359&p=7815954&preview=e54419df5ef7f1002f226ffc2c1d101f
https://guides.library.duke.edu/c.php?g=289359&p=7815954&preview=e54419df5ef7f1002f226ffc2c1d101f
Remmision (sic) of sin comes from Blood (the cross) not water
You will nto (sic) find remission of sin by having some sinner baptise (sic) you in water. You need to be baptized BY GOD into his death
Okay...but what about the question?My origianl source is Josh MacDonald.
Follow the various indexes:
https://st-takla.org/books/en/ecf/111/index.html
"
Strategies for Finding Historical Commentary on Scripture
There are three main strategies for finding historical commentary on Scripture: two are targeted, and the third exploratory.
- Strategy #1: Search by Passage
- Start with a question like, "What commentaries exist on the parable of the prodigal (Luke 15:11-32)?"
- Use the tools in the first column on the guide: these include commentary series that attend to reception history (organized by book of the Bible), as well as databases like BiblIndex that organize entries by Scripture passage.
- Strategy #2: Search by Figure
- Start with a question like, "What does Martin Luther say about the parable of the prodigal?"
- Use the tools in the second column; these exist to help index and navigate the figure's (often broad) body of writings.
- Strategy #3: Go Exploring
- Start by not knowing where to start.
- Use the tools in the third column to browse "what's out there." These include research tools like the Encyclopedia of the Bible and its Reception, which can be searched by keyword. There are also series that publish sermons, commentaries, and treatises by various figures: follow the links to browse by title!
- There are also loads of stand-alone books and articles in the library's collection that will help you in this work! See the section at the bottom of this guide for tips and tricks that will help you search the library catalog or Atla for works that engage historical interpretation of the Bible."
- https://guides.library.duke.edu/historicbiblecommentary
- https://guides.library.duke.edu/historicbiblecommentary
Hey Lamar, these guys don't respond to legitimate questions that have simple scriptural answers, and their only response is to quote or point you to so-called experts with some grandiose answers that support their false, distorted, doctrine. I wonder who the deciples of the bible turned to, their experts, to help explain the gospel. The gospel is simple as God intended it to be, simple enough that the simple people in biblical times could explain it and convert other people. These people are foolish and make no sense and are convinced that they are doing God's work but in reality,Okay...but what about the question?
Okay...but what about the question?
Yeah, Says the man who sticks to a few pet verses, and refuses to discuss the rest of the bible that proves you in errorHey Lamar, these guys don't respond to legitimate questions that have simple scriptural answers, and their only response is to quote or point you to so-called experts with some grandiose answers that support their false, distorted, doctrine. I wonder who the deciples of the bible turned to, their experts, to help explain the gospel. The gospel is simple as God intended it to be, simple enough that the simple people in biblical times could explain it and convert other people. These people are foolish and make no sense and are convinced that they are doing God's work but in reality,
are spreading false information and unscriptural doctrine. You can't reason with unreasonable people.
God bless
This is a classic example of your rather flawed reasoning.I received remission of sin WHEN I WAS BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD.
Unless you are placed into union with the death of Christ. Your sins are still condemning you
Yes! How exactly by the scriptures is one " BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD"??? I know of no such process described in the Bible. It's not nonsense.This is a classic example of your rather flawed reasoning.
The Bible clearly states that sins are forgiven at water baptism (Mark 1:4 & Acts 2:38). Your poor attempt to negate this truth by insisting that you were given the remission of sins by means of the metaphysical (BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD) is fallacious.
You are doing nothing more than spewing glittering generalities.
Lamar
Correct. There is no scriptural basis for such notions as "BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD".Yes! How exactly by the scriptures is one " BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD"??? I know of no such process described in the Bible. It's not nonsense.
Just a correction to my post which the forum system won't allow me to edit for some reason, it currently says " it's not nonsense" but should be and should have been 'its just nonsense'.Correct. There is no scriptural basis for such notions as "BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD".
This is an example of abstract or symbolic fueled reasoning. There is no logic behind it, just a desire to defend a preconceived idea.
Lamar
You can say this all you want.This is a classic example of your rather flawed reasoning.
The Bible clearly states that sins are forgiven at water baptism (Mark 1:4 & Acts 2:38). Your poor attempt to negate this truth by insisting that you were given the remission of sins by means of the metaphysical (BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD) is fallacious.
You are doing nothing more than spewing glittering generalities.
Lamar
Let seeCorrect. There is no scriptural basis for such notions as "BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD".
This is an example of abstract or symbolic fueled reasoning. There is no logic behind it, just a desire to defend a preconceived idea.
Lamar
Its nonsensical that the washing symbol in the OT never had a thing with anyones salvation. yet the symbol in the NT that represents washing is required.Just a correction to my post which the forum system won't allow me to edit for some reason, it currently says " it's not nonsense" but should be and should have been 'its just nonsense'.
Romans 6This is a classic example of your rather flawed reasoning.
The Bible clearly states that sins are forgiven at water baptism (Mark 1:4 & Acts 2:38). Your poor attempt to negate this truth by insisting that you were given the remission of sins by means of the metaphysical (BAPTIZED BY GOD INTO THE BLOOD) is fallacious.
You are doing nothing more than spewing glittering generalities.
Lamar
You can say this all you want.
Water will get me wet
Blood will make me water than snow
The bible says God will make me water than snow. Not my pastor.
Your poor attempt to lead people down the path of rejecting God and replace his work with the work of man. Will get you no further than the jew who tried the same in pauls day.
Ezekiel 36:25-27Its nonsensical that the washing symbol in the OT never had a thing with anyones salvation. yet the symbol in the NT that represents washing is required.
God is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. The means of eternal life and salvation has always been the same, it never has changed. The law never saved anyone. Neither will the so called sacraments of the church (of whch water baptism is one of the sacraments)