[h=1]August 31, 2014
Federal Court Upholds Ten Commandments Monument as Being Historical, Not Religious Display[/h]
This decision is spectacular. Not only for this religious display but as pertains to the ongoing fight to secure the place of the Mt.Soledad cross in California.
Atheists and others are hoping to have the cross removed.SCOTUS refuses to hear the case. But this decision will prayerfully set a precedent to invoke and secure the Mt.Soledad cross on the same grounds. It is a historic display and as such does not violate the establishment clause. Which is what the opponents of the cross are arguing.
God always shows a way to overcome the adversary. Praise the Lord! And bang that gavel in the name of religious freedom and historic preservation.
Federal Court Upholds Ten Commandments Monument as Being Historical, Not Religious Display[/h]
FARGO, N.D. – A Ten Commandments monument in North Dakota does not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause as it serves more as a historical display than a religious one, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled this past week. (Full Article @ CNN)
Amen!
This decision is spectacular. Not only for this religious display but as pertains to the ongoing fight to secure the place of the Mt.Soledad cross in California.
Atheists and others are hoping to have the cross removed.SCOTUS refuses to hear the case. But this decision will prayerfully set a precedent to invoke and secure the Mt.Soledad cross on the same grounds. It is a historic display and as such does not violate the establishment clause. Which is what the opponents of the cross are arguing.
God always shows a way to overcome the adversary. Praise the Lord! And bang that gavel in the name of religious freedom and historic preservation.