oh ok I’m I don’t know really I think he was just realizing why there was punishment for what he did because man hadn’t been taught about sin and death yet
they sure had been! Genesis 3 comes before Genesis 4
oh ok I’m I don’t know really I think he was just realizing why there was punishment for what he did because man hadn’t been taught about sin and death yet
yes, fish have blood
but fish are not mentioned as perishing in the flood in Genesis 7, rather, everything 'on the face of the earth' - specifically including birds, which at some point land on ground or trees which spring up from the ground.
significantly, in Genesis 1:10 God divides the dry land from the waters - and that division is present implicitly in Genesis 7.
regarding blood, there is much much much to say, but relevant to this discussion, before the flood God had given plants of every kind that produce seeds ((so not ferns, ha!)) to man for food. after the flood God gives Noah all living creatures as food ((Genesis 9:3)). that's of interest because plants do not have blood, but the living creatures do.
they sure had been! Genesis 3 comes before Genesis 4![]()
sea fish would have died from the fresh water and fresh water fish would have died from the salt of the overflowing ocean
yes certainly - but not all of them. after all, Noah didn't bring fish on the ark with him
it's interesting too that animals are killed at all - there is no indication that any animal other than man has sin.
so innocent blood is being shed -- atonement? or will those wicked people pre-flood be held accountable for the blood of the other living souls, as having brought about their murder? certainly God is no murderer - tho He gave all things breath and life, and is just to take it away if He pleases.
but the animals are called "living souls" ((in Hebrew, despite English translations deciding to put 'creature' for nephesh whenever it's anything but a human)) just like man is throughout Genesis 1-9, and have the same breath of life. a remnant of them is preserved in the ark, just like Noah, which is a picture of salvation - the ark being a figure of Christ.
sorry that's a little off track from the topic of Cain, but in my mind Genesis 7:23 settles the question of Cain surviving the flood. if he was even still alive at that point, he died with everyone else that wasn't in the ark. we can see that again in Genesis 6:13 -
And God said to Noah, “The end of all flesh has come before Me, for the earth is filled with violence through them; and behold! I will destroy them with the earth"kind of hard to argue that Cain doesn't count as part of "all flesh" -- tho at the same time fishes are also flesh. we can understand tho that He was destroying everything on the land ((same word as earth)), so, i mean unless Cain became aquaman.. lol
nope.
And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.(Genesis 7:21-23)
yes, fish have blood
but fish are not mentioned as perishing in the flood in Genesis 7, rather, everything 'on the face of the earth' - specifically including birds, which at some point land on ground or trees which spring up from the ground.
significantly, in Genesis 1:10 God divides the dry land from the waters - and that division is present implicitly in Genesis 7.
regarding blood, there is much much much to say, but relevant to this discussion, before the flood God had given plants of every kind that produce seeds ((so not ferns, ha!)) to man for food. after the flood God gives Noah all living creatures as food ((Genesis 9:3)). that's of interest because plants do not have blood, but the living creatures do.
oh ok I’m I don’t know really I think he was just realizing why there was punishment for what he did because man hadn’t been taught about sin and death yet
it could have been a lie that he thought it was too severe but I don’t know I don’t really see it that way but I’m definately not the end all knowing answer either lol been wrong too many times in life to think that
it’s definately worth considering I don’t really know if I see it that way it seems he was being genuine and speaking from fear of being cast away from Gods presence d hidden from his face that would be pretty terrifying if you had been living in Gods presence all along not knowing what was ahead and knowing Godnjad cast you away
Cain seems to geneuinely be afraid for his own safety but again that’s just how I read it
Interesting two people were cast out of God's presence Adam and Cain?![]()
Interesting two people were cast out of God's presence Adam and Cain?![]()
yes certainly - but not all of them. after all, Noah didn't bring fish on the ark with him
it's interesting too that animals are killed at all - there is no indication that any animal other than man has sin.
so innocent blood is being shed -- atonement? or will those wicked people pre-flood be held accountable for the blood of the other living souls, as having brought about their murder? certainly God is no murderer - tho He gave all things breath and life, and is just to take it away if He pleases.
but the animals are called "living souls" ((in Hebrew, despite English translations deciding to put 'creature' for nephesh whenever it's anything but a human)) just like man is throughout Genesis 1-9, and have the same breath of life. a remnant of them is preserved in the ark, just like Noah, which is a picture of salvation - the ark being a figure of Christ.
sorry that's a little off track from the topic of Cain, but in my mind Genesis 7:23 settles the question of Cain surviving the flood. if he was even still alive at that point, he died with everyone else that wasn't in the ark. we can see that again in Genesis 6:13 -
And God said to Noah, “The end of all flesh has come before Me, for the earth is filled with violence through them; and behold! I will destroy them with the earth"kind of hard to argue that Cain doesn't count as part of "all flesh" -- tho at the same time fishes are also flesh. we can understand tho that He was destroying everything on the land ((same word as earth)), and it's understood that Noah & company were excluded, but Cain isn't among them, so, i mean unless Cain became aquaman.. lol
yes certainly - but not all of them. after all, Noah didn't bring fish on the ark with him
it's interesting too that animals are killed at all - there is no indication that any animal other than man has sin.
so innocent blood is being shed -- atonement? or will those wicked people pre-flood be held accountable for the blood of the other living souls, as having brought about their murder? certainly God is no murderer - tho He gave all things breath and life, and is just to take it away if He pleases.
but the animals are called "living souls" ((in Hebrew, despite English translations deciding to put 'creature' for nephesh whenever it's anything but a human)) just like man is throughout Genesis 1-9, and have the same breath of life. a remnant of them is preserved in the ark, just like Noah, which is a picture of salvation - the ark being a figure of Christ.
sorry that's a little off track from the topic of Cain, but in my mind Genesis 7:23 settles the question of Cain surviving the flood. if he was even still alive at that point, he died with everyone else that wasn't in the ark. we can see that again in Genesis 6:13 -
And God said to Noah, “The end of all flesh has come before Me, for the earth is filled with violence through them; and behold! I will destroy them with the earth"kind of hard to argue that Cain doesn't count as part of "all flesh" -- tho at the same time fishes are also flesh. we can understand tho that He was destroying everything on the land ((same word as earth)), and it's understood that Noah & company were excluded, but Cain isn't among them, so, i mean unless Cain became aquaman.. lol
In a discussion from the same group of people I heard that the reason was that the animals were corrupted and that's why they perished, like the DNA and stuff.
Interesting pointraises the question, where did the animals that went into the ark come from?
possibly Eden
I wonder why the bible is full of riddles![]()
because He expects us to study it, and meditate on it, and pray for understanding of it -- if it was simple we might read it once and put it down. we'd become vain. it's amazing complexity shows it is His handiwork, and it humbles me to read it
just as He hid Himself in humanity in the person of Christ, He has concealed Himself in His word - so we will seek Him out, and find Him -- to His glory
It is the glory of God to conceal a thing:but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.(Proverbs 25:2)so we might become wise, by pursuing Him & clinging to Him when we find Him![]()
In a discussion from the same group of people I heard that the reason was that the animals were corrupted and that's why they perished, like the DNA and stuff.
as in the creation of nephilim, fallen angels breeding with humans
here's something interesting:
Noah was a just man, perfect in his generations. Noah walked with God.(Genesis 6:9)that word 'perfect' has many possible meanings in Hebrew -- whole, complete, blameless, or "without blemish"
it's the same word all over Leviticus describing a sacrifice that has to be without a spot.
there's an implication that Noah is "untainted" - not corrupt, unlike so much of creation had become. that could possibly mean physically uncorrupted. his genealogy is given there in Genesis 6, and in the same context as the earth becoming corrupt. it may be that God is pointing at Noah as not only being just/righteous before Him in conduct, but also having unpolluted DNA
this isn't necessarily also the case with everyone else on the ark. if nephilim are indeed the product of some kind of DNA tampering, human-angelic hybrids producing monstrously large, strong, murderous people, then there's a problem of, how did they appear on earth later? because in Canaan there were also 'anakim' - like Og, and Goliath, and Goliath's brothers. if this is somehow DNA related, then that DNA had to have been carried on the ark - the likely suspect being the wives of Noah's sons.
Interesting two people were cast out of God's presence Adam and Cain?![]()
So fascinating how do you know you've reach the end of a matter? Sigh