Yes. When you baptized in the Holy Spirit you will speak in tongues. Then you can speak in tongues whenever you want. You do the speaking, it is your tongue, the Spirit gives the utterance.
Do not think that you must be in some kind of "out of control" emotional state to speak in tongues. When Paul gave instructions about knowing when to speak in tongues in the assembly for someone with the gift of interpretation to interpret so that all could be edified, and when to speak to yourself and to God so that you could be edified, and when to prophesy, or wait for someone else to prophesy, he said that the spirit of the prophet is subject to the prophet and by saying this he is declaring that you have control over when to speak and when not to, and it is not true that one "cannot help himself" when they are moved by the Spirit to speak. The idea of uncontrollable fits of forced utterance is not how Paul explains things in 1 Cor 14. And my experience has been that I can speak in tongues at will.
Mark 16:16-18
16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
17 And
these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
18
They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
Anyone wo can allegedly speak in tongues should also be able to do all these other things, otherwise they are not speaking in tongues, but only yammering senselessly in spite of their emotions and the "evidence" their emotions present to them. To argue against this is to call Jesus a liar, or those not able to do these things are not in the faith. It cannot be both.
So, who here are complete cessationists, partial cessationists, and who rightly divides the word of truth? If tongues are still with us, then why are the speakers in tongues doing ALL these things?
Did Jesus lay down a limitation in time and events to the functionality of these things in the Church? Nope. Not one word of limitation is mentioned, but some will inevitably point to people like Wigglesworth, Copeland, Branham, et al, as if they are/were all great men who worked all these things. Wait a minute, Jesus said that ALL "those" who believe will be in operation by ALL those who believe. What other interpretation could there be in what He said?
Come on, let's dispense with laying claim to what is easily emulated as allegedly being genuine, and ALSO do all those things that cannot be emulated except by those charlatans who put on healing shows in front of video cameras and audiences that they had previously set up and choreographed.
How about it. I want to see the evidence, and all I have seen and heard thus far is blubbering in an alleged language that is not foreign language at all. No missing limbs restored, hospitals not emptied out, nothing! I'm an Israeli who believes in Paul's Gospel given to him by Christ Jesus, and I want to see ALL these things in operation that are verifiable.
If perfection coming has put an end to most of these things, then why not ALL? Who here is able to rightly divide the word of truth? Anyone? Wo here is going to call Jesus a liar by not doing ALL these things? Do you not have faith? If you are not a man or woman of faith, then you cannot be saved.
"...these signs shall follow them that believe"
Which is it? Either some here don't believe the words of Jesus, or they are not rightly dividing the word of truth, or they are followers of other interpretations that provide the convenience for getting out from under the evidence for their faith, or they just believe whatever fits the narrative of the religious bandwagon they happen to be riding. The conversations always revolve around tongues, but all the other things remain left out from the evidence of faith. Were you saved under the Kingdom Gospel or the Gospel of Grace?
Come on! Where's the proof behind some of the claims being made here? I wanna see and hear it!
MM
MM