Google's Gay Agenda

[MarkMulder]

There is a huge difference between having a liberal agenda and supporting universal human rights. What Google is doing has got nothing to do with supporting gay marriage whatsoever, it has got do with fighting Putin's administry which wants to jail people that express ideas that are not his. Google has got my full support in fighting for freedom of expression, even for the expression of people that hold beliefs completely contradicting mine.

Putin is more of a Christian than Obama. So he's jails people for immoral behaviour, so what? Google is NOT the champion of freedom of speech (it's spying on you for the NSA, helloooo?), their latest action is just a popularity stunt. Funny how "freedom of expression" for you also means the right to fornicate with another guy.

 

[JimJimmers]

Putin is more of a Christian than Obama. So he's jails people for immoral behaviour, so what? Google is NOT the champion of freedom of speech (it's spying on you for the NSA, helloooo?), their latest action is just a popularity stunt. Funny how "freedom of expression" for you also means the right to fornicate with another guy.

Many folks consider drinking an immoral activity. Would you be in favor of such a law banning alcohol?

Moreover, Putin does not appear to follow Christ by any stretch of the imagination. You should read this:


9I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; 10I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world. 11But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler-- not even to eat with such a one.…

 

[MarkMulder]

Many folks consider drinking an immoral activity. Would you be in favor of such a law banning alcohol?

Drinking alcohol in itself isn't considered immoral behaviour in the Bible, homosexuality is.
I don't care what "many folks think," I care what GOD thinks.

 

[JimJimmers]

I don't care what "many folks think," I care what GOD thinks.

If you care about what God thinks, why do you want to judge non-Christians by Christian standards? See above ^^^

 

[MarkMulder]

If you care about what God thinks, why do you want to judge non-Christians by Christian standards? See above ^^^

God is Lord over the WHOLE of His creation, HE does the judging, not me.

 

[GregoryC]

How far have we fallen here in the U.S?

In 1779, Thomas Jefferson wrote a law in Virginia which contained a punishment of castration for men who engage in sodomy,[SUP][1][/SUP]however, what was intended by Jefferson as a liberalization of the sodomy laws in Virginia at that time was rejected by the Virginia Legislature, which continued to prescribe death as the maximum penalty for the crime of sodomy in that state.[SUP][2][/SUP]
Prior to 1962, sodomy was a felony in every state, punished by a lengthy term of imprisonment and/or hard labor. In that year, theModel Penal Code (MPC) — developed by the American Law Institute to promote uniformity among the states as they modernized their statutes — struck a compromise that removed consensual sodomy from its criminal code while making it a crime to solicit for sodomy. In 1962 Illinois adopted the recommendations of the Model Penal Code and thus became the first state to remove criminal penalties for consensual sodomy from its criminal code,[SUP][3][/SUP] almost a decade before any other state.[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] Over the years, many of the states that did not repeal their sodomy laws had enacted legislation reducing the penalty. At the time of the Lawrence decision in 2003, the penalty for violating a sodomy law varied very widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction among those states retaining their sodomy laws. The harshest penalties were in Idaho, where a person convicted of sodomy could earn a life sentence. Michigan followed, with a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment while repeat offenders got life. This was later invalidated in the case of Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelly (1987).[SUP][citation needed][/SUP]
By 2002, 36 states had repealed their sodomy laws or their courts had overturned them. By the time of the 2003 Supreme Court decision, the laws in most states were no longer enforced or were enforced very selectively. The continued existence of these rarely enforced laws on the statute books, however, was often cited as justification for discrimination against gay men and lesbians.

Why should anyone try and protect such deviant and abnormal behavior? If homosexuals would stop trying to cram down our throats their twisted agenda and waving their gay flag they would likely be left alone to continue their nasty behavior in secret. I for one am sick to death of it!

 

[Historicist]

How far have we fallen here in the U.S?

In 1779, Thomas Jefferson wrote a law in Virginia which contained a punishment of castration for men who engage in sodomy,[SUP][1][/SUP]however, what was intended by Jefferson as a liberalization of the sodomy laws in Virginia at that time was rejected by the Virginia Legislature, which continued to prescribe death as the maximum penalty for the crime of sodomy in that state.[SUP][2][/SUP]
Prior to 1962, sodomy was a felony in every state, punished by a lengthy term of imprisonment and/or hard labor. In that year, theModel Penal Code (MPC) — developed by the American Law Institute to promote uniformity among the states as they modernized their statutes — struck a compromise that removed consensual sodomy from its criminal code while making it a crime to solicit for sodomy. In 1962 Illinois adopted the recommendations of the Model Penal Code and thus became the first state to remove criminal penalties for consensual sodomy from its criminal code,[SUP][3][/SUP] almost a decade before any other state.[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] Over the years, many of the states that did not repeal their sodomy laws had enacted legislation reducing the penalty. At the time of the Lawrence decision in 2003, the penalty for violating a sodomy law varied very widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction among those states retaining their sodomy laws. The harshest penalties were in Idaho, where a person convicted of sodomy could earn a life sentence. Michigan followed, with a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment while repeat offenders got life. This was later invalidated in the case of Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelly (1987).[SUP][citation needed][/SUP]
By 2002, 36 states had repealed their sodomy laws or their courts had overturned them. By the time of the 2003 Supreme Court decision, the laws in most states were no longer enforced or were enforced very selectively. The continued existence of these rarely enforced laws on the statute books, however, was often cited as justification for discrimination against gay men and lesbians.

Why should anyone try and protect such deviant and abnormal behavior? If homosexuals would stop trying to cram down our throats their twisted agenda and waving their gay flag they would likely be left alone to continue their nasty behavior in secret. I for one am sick to death of it!

Thank you GregoryC, it's too bad there is a conspiracy, in media, in government, in education and in entertainment, to conceal historical, and scriptural truth on this subject.

 

[Nautilus]

How far have we fallen here in the U.S?

In 1779, Thomas Jefferson wrote a law in Virginia which contained a punishment of castration for men who engage in sodomy,[SUP][1][/SUP]however, what was intended by Jefferson as a liberalization of the sodomy laws in Virginia at that time was rejected by the Virginia Legislature, which continued to prescribe death as the maximum penalty for the crime of sodomy in that state.[SUP][2][/SUP]
Prior to 1962, sodomy was a felony in every state, punished by a lengthy term of imprisonment and/or hard labor. In that year, theModel Penal Code (MPC) — developed by the American Law Institute to promote uniformity among the states as they modernized their statutes — struck a compromise that removed consensual sodomy from its criminal code while making it a crime to solicit for sodomy. In 1962 Illinois adopted the recommendations of the Model Penal Code and thus became the first state to remove criminal penalties for consensual sodomy from its criminal code,[SUP][3][/SUP] almost a decade before any other state.[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] Over the years, many of the states that did not repeal their sodomy laws had enacted legislation reducing the penalty. At the time of the Lawrence decision in 2003, the penalty for violating a sodomy law varied very widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction among those states retaining their sodomy laws. The harshest penalties were in Idaho, where a person convicted of sodomy could earn a life sentence. Michigan followed, with a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment while repeat offenders got life. This was later invalidated in the case of Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelly (1987).[SUP][citation needed][/SUP]
By 2002, 36 states had repealed their sodomy laws or their courts had overturned them. By the time of the 2003 Supreme Court decision, the laws in most states were no longer enforced or were enforced very selectively. The continued existence of these rarely enforced laws on the statute books, however, was often cited as justification for discrimination against gay men and lesbians.

Why should anyone try and protect such deviant and abnormal behavior? If homosexuals would stop trying to cram down our throats their twisted agenda and waving their gay flag they would likely be left alone to continue their nasty behavior in secret. I for one am sick to death of it!

Most sodomy laws where eventually ignored due to them being made to fight homosexuality but also harming hetero couples as well. In lawrence vs Texas, the supreme court basically ruled that it was unconstitutional for the government to legislate what goes on the bedroom regardless of whether its sodomy between two same sex people or a straight couple.

 

[Desdichado]

I'm more concerned about Google's wider agenda.

 

[BowTied]

Google is just another part of the leftist media that serves as the almost-official propaganda ministry of the Sacrilegious Left. A significant portion of this is the Sodomitic Left, shoving their Godlessness down our throats. Just look at ABC "Family," which touts itself as "a new kind of family." They show filth like The Fosters, a show about a couple of lesbians raising foster children. FOX's Family Guy and The Simpsons has done plenty to push the sodomitic agenda. Then there's ABC's Modern Family (should be called Sodom Family or Modern Fagottry) which sports a couple of sodomites raising a kid. JESUS! PLEASE RETURN SOON!

 

[Aerendyl]

So he's jails people for immoral behaviour, so what?

Would be fun to see everyone going to jail for gluttony, including a Food Gestapo that look for people who are stuffing themselves, or even worse, expressing that eating a lot of food isn't thát immoral.

 

[Nautilus]

Google is just another part of the leftist media that serves as the almost-official propaganda ministry of the Sacrilegious Left. A significant portion of this is the Sodomitic Left, shoving their Godlessness down our throats. Just look at ABC "Family," which touts itself as "a new kind of family." They show filth like The Fosters, a show about a couple of lesbians raising foster children. FOX's Family Guy and The Simpsons has done plenty to push the sodomitic agenda. Then there's ABC's Modern Family (should be called Sodom Family or Modern Fagottry) which sports a couple of sodomites raising a kid. JESUS! PLEASE RETURN SOON!

Well aren't you just a ray of sunshine. Hopefully you don't kiss oyur mother with that mouth. Hopefully with all that hatred I see you no longer kiss boys like that one from high school you posted about.

 

[Historicist]

Would be fun to see everyone going to jail for gluttony, including a Food Gestapo that look for people who are stuffing themselves, or even worse, expressing that eating a lot of food isn't thát immoral.

I interpret your comment as a veiled defense of that which the Bible condemns.

 

[Historicist]

Google is just another part of the leftist media that serves as the almost-official propaganda ministry of the Sacrilegious Left. A significant portion of this is the Sodomitic Left, shoving their Godlessness down our throats. Just look at ABC "Family," which touts itself as "a new kind of family." They show filth like The Fosters, a show about a couple of lesbians raising foster children. FOX's Family Guy and The Simpsons has done plenty to push the sodomitic agenda. Then there's ABC's Modern Family (should be called Sodom Family or Modern Fagottry) which sports a couple of sodomites raising a kid. JESUS! PLEASE RETURN SOON!

I agree BowTied, the anti-Christian/anti-Christ media and entertainment system is pushing the sodomite agenda. This will end when:

The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend (legalized sin, i.e., sodomy, etc.) and them which do iniquity (lawlessness). Matthew 13:41 (parentheses mine)

 

[Historicist]

Well aren't you just a ray of sunshine. Hopefully you don't kiss oyur mother with that mouth. Hopefully with all that hatred I see you no longer kiss boys like that one from high school you posted about.

Nautilus, why are you critical of BowTied instead of the evil agenda he opposes?

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness. Isaiah 5:20

 

[Nautilus]

Nautilus, why are you critical of BowTied instead of the evil agenda he opposes?

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness. Isaiah 5:20

He can oppose it all he likes. Thats fine, but he can do so with some decorum. Faggot isn't much better in terms of slurs than the N word. Both are totally disrespectful and meant to be degrading. And whether or not you agree with the homosexual lifestyle they are still people deserving of Christ's love, not debasement from some past his prime neo-con. Especially when BowTied as already posted about his own struggles with homosexual temptation, one would think he would be more understanding.

 

[AgeofKnowledge]

Do you think the Christian bakers facing prison sentences, a lifetime branded as felons, bankruptcy, harassment, and threats against their persons and lives BY homosexuals and their liberal supporters for refusing to bake a single cake for a homosexual 'marriage' are "deserving of Christ's love, not debasement from homosexuals and liberals?"

One would think homosexuals and liberals would be more understanding. But they aren't. They will deliberately destroy Christian families in the USA over a single cake instead of choose another of the many options available.

He can oppose it all he likes. Thats fine, but he can do so with some decorum. Faggot isn't much better in terms of slurs than the N word. Both are totally disrespectful and meant to be degrading. And whether or not you agree with the homosexual lifestyle they are still people deserving of Christ's love, not debasement from some past his prime neo-con. Especially when BowTied as already posted about his own struggles with homosexual temptation, one would think he would be more understanding.

 

[Nautilus]

Do you think the Christian bakers facing prison sentences, a lifetime branded as felons, bankruptcy, harassment, and threats against their persons and lives BY homosexuals and their liberal supporters for refusing to bake a single cake for a homosexual 'marriage' are "deserving of Christ's love, not debasement from homosexuals and liberals?"

One would think homosexuals and liberals would be more understanding. But they aren't. They will deliberately destroy Christian families in the USA over a single cake instead of choose another of the many options available.

Oh well...guess that shows you what discriminating and staying in the 'good ole days' will get you. Honestly I don't care. One family of rightwing conservatives? Whatever. Soon there won't be enough conservatives left to matter.

 

[AgeofKnowledge]

Got it Nautilus. You could care less about the harsh persecution of your moral Christian neighbors because they cannot in good conscience lend their support to an immoral act condemned in God's Word.

They've stated they would happily bake a cake for the homosexuals, whom they love and stated they love, for any moral reason whatsoever and the homosexuals have a plethora of options. They don't need to leverage the government to harshly persecute moral Christians. They deliberately choose to do it.

You think it's not going to matter when you stand before the son of God and look in His eyes knowing full well that you've violated the second greatest commandment and did so uncaringly with respect to moral genuine Christians. Think again.

You don't care now, but you will son. You will.

Matthew 25:31-46 - The Sheep and the Goats - “When the - Bible Gateway

2 Timothy 3:1-5 NIV - But mark this: There will be terrible - Bible Gateway

Oh well...guess that shows you what discriminating and staying in the 'good ole days' will get you. Honestly I don't care. One family of rightwing conservatives? Whatever. Soon there won't be enough conservatives left to matter.

 

[Nautilus]

Yes because I feel I have greater things to do as a christian than obsess over the gays I have broken some commandment. Maybe if christians spent less time obsessing over gays and more time focusing on well anything else honestly...this country would be a better place. Ever think christians are 'persecuted' by people because they are the only ones bringing up issues with it CONSTANTLY?

Maybe instead find a cause that matters to fight...like poverty, or sex trafficking, or child abuse, or rape. Work to stop that, instead of caring what people are doing in their bedrooms, thats none of your business anyways.