I only see "ashen" given as a legitimate usage of chloros on sites that are dedicated to promoting the kjv, and it seems they are getting this from concordances not dictionaries..?
Which would be assuming the conclusion to use it as proof of itself, a logical fallacy.
Surprise, surprise! A KJV biased site defends changing the original text...... despite the fact that the author of The Book of Revelation used the exact same word in two other places in the same Book of Revelation to describe pure green grass and trees.