This forms a chicken and egg dillema. Which came first? Did the Scriptures come first, or did knowledge of God come first? Obviously, God inspired people to write the Scriptures. The source of their inspiration was not the Bible. God Himself was their source. He led them, and they followed. That is the same thing we do. We know God because He lives in our hearts. And He is not a silent God. He speaks to us Spirit to spirit, and we hear Him and we follow Him.There is no "knowledge of God" apart from the scriptures.
A person who does not think God speaks to him from the intimacy of his own heart would agree with you that we have nothing to believe in outside the Bible.Scriptures... teach us what God has said and meant. It's the "voice" of God" and apart from what has been revealed in His word, there is no knowledge of God and His will anyone can rely on. We have nothing to believe in.
What I like to call "The Silent God Theory" is the premise of your final question. It says "God does not speak to us today except through the Bible. If you want to know God's will, you must go find it in the Bible. If you want to obey God, then you must obey the Bible." The problem, of course, is that a person can't believe the Bible and believe that God is not actively involved in our lives, leading, guiding, directing, correcting, and comforting us from the intimacy of our own hearts.Until you hear "The word of God", Until you hear the "gospel", or read it, you cannot be saved, because you have no idea what the gospel is. The source is the "word of God". Any deviation from the gospel, recorded in the bible, and you are lost and headed for hell, are you not? How could you tell if there were a deviation from the truth without it?
I believe you are conflating God and the Bible. You have admitted as much. I am saying that you are wrong on several fronts. First, the Bible is not God. Second, God is not silent. Third, His voice can be trusted because He is the most trustworthy person in existence. These errors are not independent, but interdependent. If our reality were to include no God or a slient God, then your propositions would make perfect sense. We would need the Bible to guide us into all truth because we would not have Him. But that is not the paradigm that we are operating under.I do believe that your disagreement is not with me.
The Spirit of God teaches us concerning all things:I still don't know what the problem is, "Faith comes by hearing" Yes. So preaching, sharing the "Word of God" is "Essential" for saving faith, "And hearing, by the word of God. Are we disagreeing? I am not seeing disagreement. I agree fully with the scriptures you are quoting, but you would have no scriptures to quote apart from the word of God, and the Word of God, right?
26 These things I have written to you concerning those who try to deceive you. 27 But the anointing which you have received from Him abides in you, and you do not need that anyone teach you; but as the same anointing teaches you concerning all things, and is true, and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you will abide in Him. (1 Jn 2:26–27)
God inspired John to write these things to help us grasp the truth that God's Spirit is teaching us. God wants us to be aware that He lives in our hearts and that He is personally is teaching us the things He wants us to know. When we grasp that concept, and when we realize that God is actively guiding our understanding as John describes, we don't look back and give credit to the Scriptures for placing God into our hearts. But we rejoice in the role the Scriptures played in helping us to understand what God is doing in our lives.
Hopefully what I said above helps fill in the gaps.Like I said, I am lost. I can't find a disagreement, unless you disagree with my points. Sorry. Maybe it's because I haven't had my cup of coffee yet. If you are willing to try again, if you see any disagreement, I most certainly will try and grasp what you share.