"I am your retribution"
- Thread starter ZNP
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
An American who is against aggression donates money to a charity that is sent to Ukraine, little does he know that this charity is used to buy champagne and villas overseas for those who are profiting from the war. When you send $100 billion somewhere you should realize you will attract a big den of thieves around that money.
What is shocking is that we gave him $100 billion and didn't ask for any accountability for how the money was spent.
OK man. Just send the money. No skin off my nose. However I myself cannot participate knowing the facts. It would be a violation of my conscience.
Why haven't you responded to the video I posted showing footage from Capitol Hill on January 6th? You have ridiculed those who questioned whether this was a false flag, you have made it clear you see this as an insurrection. This was the so called leader of that insurrection. No one wants to hear anything you have to say until you respond to that.
If it was a crime then shouldn't the police who escorted him around and helped open doors for him also be in jail?
And you agree with 4 year prison sentence?
And you agree that "trespassing" is equivalent to insurrection?
And you agree with the characterization as violent insurrection?
Also don't you think he should have been allowed to show this video at his trial as part of his defense?
There are other videos, for example Tucker showed video evidence that Ray Epps instigated the people to enter the capitol and he lied under oath to investigators. Don't you think he should be tried?
We also have video evidence of numerous people breaking windows, instigating the worst parts of this event and yet none of them are in jail or have been charged. Shouldn't those ones be charged?
You really need to stretch your perspective and grasp of the larger picture here bro.
This was a pre-planned premeditated false flag of sorts. An inside job, a set-up. With a full complement of spooks, rogue agents, subterfuge, ........FROM BOTH sides, who had marching orders and objectives set forth......LONG BEFORE THE INCIDENT EVERY BEGUN.
To postulate that this was simply a case of trespassing is absurdly naive.
Yes, Tucker definitely implied that this could be proved if they can identify some of the people instigating what happened. If it turns out the instigators were feds then this was entrapment.
However, yesterday he provided irrefutable proof that
1. Everyone in the Jan 6th committee is a liar that should be impeached.
2. Ray Epps is a criminal who needs to be prosecuted (and if it turns out he is a fed then everything collapses at that point)
and
3. Numerous public officials all the way up to Biden and Harris are liars about police being killed as well as the media that spread that lie.
Like he said He has not proved that the feds were involved in entrapment because he doesn't have facial recognition capability. The US government does and it is inexcusable that with an event like this, likened to Pearl Harbor and 911 by Harris, that they have not used that capability to identify and prosecute the instigators.
What Tucker said would be irresponsible would be to put up videos of people instigating the event insinuating that they were feds. If he makes a mistake on any you know he will be raked over the coals and accused of being a liar.
So instead I think what they should do is get good still shots of these guys and show them to whistleblowers within the Federal government.
Or
Don't insinuate anything. Simply show the videotape evidence of people who instigated the attack on network TV for millions to see and ask if anyone knows who these provocateurs are. It seems to me that you discuss the best way to go about this with your legal department. It also seems to me that there have to be many sympathetic people who do have access to facial recognition software who may have heard last nights episode and may contact Tucker.
Also, it is very likely that Tucker already knows the names and already knows they work for the feds, but by doing what he did yesterday he makes it appear that someone watching assisted him with the facial recognition, in this way they help protect their source.
Their are multiple sources of Facial recognition. Google images can search for faces, Facebook searches, someone at the DMV, maybe a US marshal, a policeman for a large department like NYC could have access, someone in the FBI, someone who handles passports, etc. I would think after last nights episode there must be over a thousand people who could help Tucker figure out who these people are. Also what about a congressional committee? Can't MTG, or Matt Gaetz, or the Secret Service detail working with Trump, can't they do it?
So instead I think what they should do is get good still shots of these guys and show them to whistleblowers within the Federal government.
Or
Don't insinuate anything. Simply show the videotape evidence of people who instigated the attack on network TV for millions to see and ask if anyone knows who these provocateurs are. It seems to me that you discuss the best way to go about this with your legal department. It also seems to me that there have to be many sympathetic people who do have access to facial recognition software who may have heard last nights episode and may contact Tucker.
Also, it is very likely that Tucker already knows the names and already knows they work for the feds, but by doing what he did yesterday he makes it appear that someone watching assisted him with the facial recognition, in this way they help protect their source.
Their are multiple sources of Facial recognition. Google images can search for faces, Facebook searches, someone at the DMV, maybe a US marshal, a policeman for a large department like NYC could have access, someone in the FBI, someone who handles passports, etc. I would think after last nights episode there must be over a thousand people who could help Tucker figure out who these people are. Also what about a congressional committee? Can't MTG, or Matt Gaetz, or the Secret Service detail working with Trump, can't they do it?