They were not specifically called Olive Branches, like the Two Witnesses of Revelation 11!How did Jesus send out His disciples?
They were not specifically called Olive Branches, like the Two Witnesses of Revelation 11!How did Jesus send out His disciples?
I know the first portion of Matthew 24 is about 70 AD, but Revelation, is completely different.I am not twisted I follow what Jesus stated very clearly.
But he answered and said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.—Matthew 24:34
Since you resorted to ad hominem I am no longer interested in discussing with you.
I do feel sorry for you tying up your persona (Watcher) with a faulty interpretation instead of the plain understanding of what Jesus stated and to whom He spoke and what it meant to them not 2000 or more years into the future.
The church has been engrafted.They were not specifically called Olive Branches, like the Two Witnesses of Revelation 11!
Never heard that one before. Perhaps you are confusing John with Peter, who they say was martyred by Nero?
Look, you know it does not align. why try?The church has been engrafted.
I think this holds as much weight as Ireneaus
The Syriac History of John, the Son of Zebedee makes reference to John’s banishment under Nero, who reigned from 54 to 68 AD. It states:
“After these things, when the Gospel was increasing by the hands of the Apostles, Nero, the unclean and impure and wicked king, heard all that had happened at Ephesus. And he sent and took all that the procurator had and imprisoned him; and laid hold of St. John and drove him into exile; and passed sentence on the city that it should be laid waste.”
https://www.nasscal.com/e-clavis-christian-apocrypha/history-of-john-syriac/
I know the first portion of Matthew 24 is about 70 AD, but Revelation, is completely different.
We obviously view it differently, but you have convinced yourself of certain things. I was just seeing how open you were to a discussion.Look, you know it does not align. why try?
You really have to ignore the Holy Spirit to make them align. But then again, Calvinist always ignore the Holy Spirit to yank Verses out of place to create false doctrines.They actually line up really well, if you wanted you could research it with an open mind.
I will look into this.
How?We obviously view it differently, but you have convinced yourself of certain things. I was just seeing how open you were to a discussion.
You really have to ignore the Holy Spirit to make them align. But then again, Calvinist always ignore the Holy Spirit to yank Verses out of place to create false doctrines.
PAPYRUS 98 (P98)Please do the research on the dating of John, I think you will find if your mind is open it was written before 70AD
PAPYRUS 98 (P98)
Nov 27, 2022 — It is a papyrus manuscript of the Book of Revelation. ... A tiny fragment that dates to about 100-150 A.D.
Papyrus 98, means they have settled that Revelation was written around 98 AD.
This TEST was conducted (([[[[LESS THAN]]])) ((6 Months ago))!
Knowing THIS MUCH:Please do the research on the dating of John, I think you will find if your mind is open it was written before 70AD
THEY ALL SAY COPY!It is a copy, not the original. I am pretty sure John was dead by 150AD
Okay I am done, you seem triggered because you are too emotionally invested in being right and in your view.
Papyrus 98 (in the Gregory–Aland numbering), designated by 𝔓98, is an early copy of the New Testament in Greek. It is a papyrus manuscript of the Book of Revelation.
The manuscript paleographically had been assigned to years 150–175.