Independent Women

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

JimJimmers

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2012
2,594
77
48
#81
I think there are often two definitions of words. The Christian one and the worldly one. Just a few off the top of my head: "Party"; "Date"; "Independent"; "Love". I have seen people who were lost but since had gotten saved get triggered by the use of some of those words, just due to their worldly meaning.

Some words have identical origins but underwent a lexicological schism through time. Think of "terrible" and "terrific" (and "terrify"!) Same Latin, different connotation. I am noted for wandering off-topic. Idk if it gives me notoriety or if I am notorious for it.

So while I think your definition of independence is a good thing, it is a bit of a connotation thing. I consider myself to care about the environment, but I don't call myself an environmentalist because it conjures up a mental image of incinerating SUV's or vandalizing logging equipment. I have even seen "Masculine" defined in a bad way. I would still consider myself masculine but I might add a conversational fabric softener to my sentence if I was talking to someone that I thought might have only experienced the worst aspects of masculinity.
 
K

keepingthingsreal

Guest
#82
If I grant that it's a "very low percentage of men" that are ready/equipped to be godly husbands, we still see the same "independent" mindset within marriages (inside and outside the church). The commandments given to husbands and wives are not conditional if they are "ready and equipped" to do so, it's unconditional. So even if they fall short to the glory of God, the fact they are already in a marriage would entail they are obliged to their assigned roles.
The type of independent women that I was referring to are unmarried women. I am sorry if I did not make that clear, but I believe (I could be mistaken) that these types of independent women were the original topic of this thread. Also, I did not mean to imply that what God looks for regarding men/women/marriage is conditional. Instead, I was writing from the mindset of unmarried people, and I was seeking to add to what you said here.
If I had a daughter, I would teach her how to be independent (self-reliant) but understand the importance of teaching her when to give that independence up.
In other words, as important as it is to teach one's daughter these types of things, I was adding how important it is to teach one's son the things that I explained. I probably did a very poor job of communicating that, so I apologize for any confusion.
Furthermore, you give the cause-effect of unworthy/unequipped men being the reason why women cling to independence, and while I believe it is A reason (not THE reason), I would just point to the rise of feminism in the US to the rise in divorce rates. It's sort of the chicken or the egg discussion, but if we only look at marriages, we see the influence decaying what God has designed for our benefit. Feminism it's multifaceted and is a broader scope to look at why we are in the current state we are in.
I have no problem with what you said here. I would simply add that I was not seeking to imply that the reason I gave was the only reason why some women might cling to their independence. Again, if I did a poor job of conveying that, then I apologize.
The beginning of your post (where we agree entirely), I would just add that this is why it's important to vet the person they want to engage in a 3-way covenant in marriage with. I try to imagine how women must feel in having to submit to the husband's authority/leadership and it's very difficult. For this reason, it's our responsibility that we choose someone who personifies the characteristics God has called for.
I agree.
The unfortunate part is that they could actually personify those characteristics/attributes today, but there is no guarantee they will do so tomorrow.
This is true, but that is where the third party (God) in the relationship is of utmost importance. He knows the end from the beginning, and if we seek his face, then he will show us what is to come.
 

Roughsoul1991

Senior Member
Sep 17, 2016
8,934
4,591
113
#83
Hey guys, there's something I've been wondering about and thought I'd get some outside perspectives.

Lately I keep hearing guys refer to "Independent women" in a very negative way. They mention how unattractive it is and how silly it is for a woman to think she doesn't "need" a man.

I get that men and women are designed to compliment each other's strengths and weaknesses. No argument there. But there's plenty of us ladies who have entered middle age and realize that we might never have a man looking out for us. So, in that case......wouldn't it be silly for us to go about "needing" something we don't have? Isn't the logical course of action to figure out how to make do without something you might NEVER have? :unsure:

Perhaps I am misunderstanding what men mean by "independent". I would have thought it just meant a woman who pays her own bills, doesn't make her problems other people's problems, and probably won't call you sobbing from the side of the road because she forgot to put gas in the car. But maybe I'm mistaken about that, and men are referring to something else entirely?

Anyways, thoughts? I realize that not all men are turned off by independence, I'm just curious why anyone would be..... seems like its a good trait regardless of gender, yet I generally hear it like it's a bad thing for women and a good thing for men. :unsure:
Good afternoon Snackersmom,

You have a very good question that seems to be a trending topic for the culture which begs an answer from the church.

To define an independent woman can be different according to who you speak to.

Many of us would define it as you have, a single woman who is self-sustainable.

Others say it is a positive response to: The systemic oppression of women and gender-based discrimination related to unconscious biases associated with the patriarchy of a male-dominated culture.

Others will see it as negative in the sense of normalizing a non-traditional family structure.

Should the government care? The government's only concern should be the health of society and whether are we birthing enough people to replace the aging workforce. So you may see why the government keeps tabs on marriages, a census, and healthcare. (Obviously, this is an ideal government).

Should we care?
Well yes and no.
The Bible gives us some guidance:


1 Corinthians 7:7-9
7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. 9 But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

So it is important to point out that Paul is making it clear that he is speaking from personal opinion and not as a cemented doctrinal statement. But he does say that being single has its benefits with serving the Lord. Of course, as a warning he understands that this is a difficult calling as many are not self-controlled in the feeling of passion for the opposite sex and they easily fall into sin.

Genesis 2:24
Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

It is no doubt that God intended us to have a helper. Being independent is hard only having two hands to pay the bills, feed the kids, do the chores, etc. Historically, women needed men for protection and hard labor. Not to downgrade the female's ability to defend or work hard labor but when paired against men, biologically they naturally would struggle or sadly be left to the barbarism of men who by brute force did what they wanted with women.

Romans 13:1
Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.

To be fruitful and multiply would benefit the formation of the tribes of Abraham, the nation of Israel, the kingdom of David, etc. God designed marriage to form societies. And in societies, we should care for the health and security of the nation.

Being single is okay but it could never be completely encouraged as we need marriage to uphold society and spiritually it serves as a testimony for Jesus as the Groom and the Church as the Bride.

What of the patriarchy?

Well in some sense yes Biblically the man is to lead in the home/marriage. But they are also called to love like Christ and love their wife as themselves. So the patriarchy as modern feminism only aligns with the Bible in the sense that it is a sin to abuse, discriminate solely due to hatred of the opposite sex, or abuse power over the woman.

Bias in the workforce is tricky because some jobs biologically are better for men. For example, if a man can stack 100 hay bales a day whereas a woman averages 50 a day, should they get paid the same? Would it be discrimination to fire a woman to hire a man? Or that she is paid less? Some will say yes.

Sure Proverbs 31 speaks of a wife but it also highlights a woman of noble character,

She is like the merchant ships,
bringing her food from afar.
15 She gets up while it is still night;
she provides food for her family
and portions for her female servants.
16 She considers a field and buys it; out of her earnings she plants a vineyard.
17 She sets about her work vigorously;

Does that sound like a woman who is dependent on a man? Not to me, it highlights that her independence in some areas can be a great strengths for her husband. As for single independence, it still highlights the lifestyle of a noble woman.

Conclusion: If you have chosen a single life for God and do not struggle with wanting a relationship then there is nothing wrong with living that way.

If you do struggle, then there is nothing wrong with praying and seeking marriage. Marriage is a lifelong concept so there is no age limit. Middle age or even in the 60s, 80s, etc. The truth of God's design with Adam and Eve will never go out of date at least until death do us part.

I hope this sheds light on how female independence can be perceived as negative in one sense but positive in another.

For you personally, never see yourself as negative for being independent enough to provide for your family or yourself. If men see that as negative then that would be a red flag of insecurities and immaturity.

Life is hard and it would be unwise for a female to completely rely on a man. Men on average die before women. Also, in a culture of sin, it can be hard to find a man to marry. God understands this.
 

stilllearning

Well-known member
Oct 4, 2021
617
314
63
#84
Hey guys, there's something I've been wondering about and thought I'd get some outside perspectives.

Lately I keep hearing guys refer to "Independent women" in a very negative way. They mention how unattractive it is and how silly it is for a woman to think she doesn't "need" a man.

I get that men and women are designed to compliment each other's strengths and weaknesses. No argument there. But there's plenty of us ladies who have entered middle age and realize that we might never have a man looking out for us. So, in that case......wouldn't it be silly for us to go about "needing" something we don't have? Isn't the logical course of action to figure out how to make do without something you might NEVER have? :unsure:

Perhaps I am misunderstanding what men mean by "independent". I would have thought it just meant a woman who pays her own bills, doesn't make her problems other people's problems, and probably won't call you sobbing from the side of the road because she forgot to put gas in the car. But maybe I'm mistaken about that, and men are referring to something else entirely?

Anyways, thoughts? I realize that not all men are turned off by independence, I'm just curious why anyone would be..... seems like its a good trait regardless of gender, yet I generally hear it like it's a bad thing for women and a good thing for men. :unsure:
I can only speak on my experience. I have learnt in life that if a gal is into you then she is gonna let you in and make it easy. So for me I just took the phrase I am independent as her just letting me know that the attraction or interest is really not there. Personally I just found it as a wall.

By that say for example in convo she says men have done me wrong so I have learned to be independent and trust in myself. I would find that perhaps she was not ready to trust again or at least I was not the one. Or say in convo it came up what my goals or plans where and she replied. Well I got my own thing going and plan to see it through I am independent like that. Again I just saw that really I was not the one.

So for me when I heard it the times I did it was a wall or roadblock which is cool cause she was just letting me know she was not feeling any vibe. So no harm no fool.
 

Sculpt

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2021
1,153
372
83
#85
Lately I keep hearing guys refer to "Independent women" in a very negative way. They mention how unattractive it is and how silly it is for a woman to think she doesn't "need" a man.
I've honestly never heard a man say any of those things. So, at least that's a positive, right? At least for me. lol

I admire competent people. I'd be a fool not to.

I think some people feel intimidated or small when they're around competent people and are unaware they're spewing some sour grapes.

Everybody has strengths and weaknesses and carry some emotional damage. I think some people feel the need to go after people who they think have as many deficits as they do, or they just won't feel like they measure up... and if that's the case it's hard to feel a natural confidence and peace.
 
May 10, 2011
1,780
379
83
#86
I try to imagine how women must feel in having to submit to the husband's authority/leadership and it's very difficult. For this reason, it's our responsibility that we choose someone who personifies the characteristics God has called for.
Thank you for raising this point... so often I have encountered men who seem to think that submission ought to be easy, and there must be something wrong with the woman if it isn't.

Your comment also made me realize that one reason the independence thing is an issue for me is that, sometimes females in the church are expected to behave as if they are married, even when they aren't. Wait that doesn't sound right lol 🤣. What I mean is that we are sometimes expected to be deferential to the men in church simply because they are men.... not because we are married to them. Not all churches hold to this of course, but it's something I have personally encountered. 🤔 I have no issue deferring to the men who have actual church authority, but too often male baby Christians expect deference from all the single ladies, their only "qualification" being that they are male. 😖

Anyways..... when I posted the OP, I only had single women in mind, but you and others have raised a good point that too much independence would be detrimental to a marriage. 👍
 
May 10, 2011
1,780
379
83
#87
I appreciate all the replies! Y'all raised some really good points, and I'm seeing things a bit more clearly now.

Good point @JimJimmers , that worldly women might have a different definition of independence than Godly women.

And thanks for your thorough reply @Roughsoul1991 , I will be re-reading it!

@stilllearning , interesting point you raised about women using the word "independent" to communicate a lack of interest. I would not have thought of that. If I told a guy I'm "kinda independent", I would just mean that I'm a free thinker, not super chatty or clingy, and I'd need a guy who wouldn't try to fit me into the mold of what he wants. I'm sure the right guy would change me in positive ways, but I wouldn't want to be with him if he wasn't ok with how God intrinsically made me. 'Cuz I don't know how to be anyone else lol 😆.

@LifelongLearner, I totally agree, male friends are great and their input can be invaluable! Viva La difference! 😎

@Sculpt ..... your input is always insightful and appreciated. 🙂 And to be fair, I seem to hear the complaints about female independence more often from guys in their 20s and 30s, so maybe they are reacting more to things they are seeing on tic tok or wherever..... maybe it's a cultural thing that has spilled over into the church. 🤔
 
Jan 16, 2025
24
9
3
#88
The level you are in your walk will direct you to looking in the mirror so watch your steps so you see genuine when she peers back at you
 
Sep 17, 2016
8,934
4,591
113
#89
I appreciate all the replies! Y'all raised some really good points, and I'm seeing things a bit more clearly now.

Good point @JimJimmers , that worldly women might have a different definition of independence than Godly women.

And thanks for your thorough reply @Roughsoul1991 , I will be re-reading it!

@stilllearning , interesting point you raised about women using the word "independent" to communicate a lack of interest. I would not have thought of that. If I told a guy I'm "kinda independent", I would just mean that I'm a free thinker, not super chatty or clingy, and I'd need a guy who wouldn't try to fit me into the mold of what he wants. I'm sure the right guy would change me in positive ways, but I wouldn't want to be with him if he wasn't ok with how God intrinsically made me. 'Cuz I don't know how to be anyone else lol 😆.

@LifelongLearner, I totally agree, male friends are great and their input can be invaluable! Viva La difference! 😎

@Sculpt ..... your input is always insightful and appreciated. 🙂 And to be fair, I seem to hear the complaints about female independence more often from guys in their 20s and 30s, so maybe they are reacting more to things they are seeing on tic tok or wherever..... maybe it's a cultural thing that has spilled over into the church. 🤔
No problem. Hopefully you find some peace with this topic.
 

stilllearning

Well-known member
Oct 4, 2021
617
314
63
#90
@stilllearning , interesting point you raised about women using the word "independent" to communicate a lack of interest. I would not have thought of that. If I told a guy I'm "kinda independent", I would just mean that I'm a free thinker, not super chatty or clingy, and I'd need a guy who wouldn't try to fit me into the mold of what he wants. I'm sure the right guy would change me in positive ways, but I wouldn't want to be with him if he wasn't ok with how God intrinsically made me. 'Cuz I don't know how to be anyone else lol 😆.
I wanted to just use my personal experience. However, I like the way you explained how you may use the term. Because as I was typing out my experience I was always making sure I did not add any analysis of mine by that. I can very much see when a gal says it, it could mean she is low maintenance. She likes the guy and does no want to scare him off so she wants to send the message that she is low maintenance.

So the gist is though that most gals are wanting to convey a message. I was in the service during my experience and it made sense the reply as such. As any one who really is looking for more than a casual date. I believe the realization there is if you are a spouse of someone in the service you are not only married to them but also to the service. So there will be sacrifice on your part as well which can mean you never get to chase any of your personal goals or dreams.

However, you hit the nail on the head the "right guy". The right person could make it so the reward was greater than the risk. So I can't ever fault any honesty when someone lets you know right up front that it is not going to work out or you are not the one. I don't see how anyone can find it a negative when someone stops you from wasting your time.

However, I think the term I am independent really is personal and individual to the person and how they will use it to convey a message. So I find there is a difference when it used in say a public setting or influenced by peers or others around you. Which I believe that men tend to answer it from that perspective of how it makes them feel emotionally. Generally meeting the same energy of how it is said and meeting the energy of how the message is meant to be conveyed publicly.

The thing is though how someone may answer in a setting like that vs one on one. In a setting of it being personal and the way their life and the other persons will interact in a manner of being harmonious or chaotic. I find that many times a persons public persona is influenced by many factors. Whereas who they are and how they answer in a personal setting is honestly more who they are as the only factor is, is that the life they want and can they live with it.
 
May 10, 2011
1,780
379
83
#91
No problem. Hopefully you find some peace with this topic.
Thanks! It's not affecting me too much, I was just finding myself bristling at the subject a little bit. When that happens I figure I'm probably misunderstanding something. All the input has been very helpful! 😎👍
 
May 10, 2011
1,780
379
83
#92
I wanted to just use my personal experience. However, I like the way you explained how you may use the term. Because as I was typing out my experience I was always making sure I did not add any analysis of mine by that. I can very much see when a gal says it, it could mean she is low maintenance. She likes the guy and does no want to scare him off so she wants to send the message that she is low maintenance.

So the gist is though that most gals are wanting to convey a message. I was in the service during my experience and it made sense the reply as such. As any one who really is looking for more than a casual date. I believe the realization there is if you are a spouse of someone in the service you are not only married to them but also to the service. So there will be sacrifice on your part as well which can mean you never get to chase any of your personal goals or dreams.

However, you hit the nail on the head the "right guy". The right person could make it so the reward was greater than the risk. So I can't ever fault any honesty when someone lets you know right up front that it is not going to work out or you are not the one. I don't see how anyone can find it a negative when someone stops you from wasting your time.

However, I think the term I am independent really is personal and individual to the person and how they will use it to convey a message. So I find there is a difference when it used in say a public setting or influenced by peers or others around you. Which I believe that men tend to answer it from that perspective of how it makes them feel emotionally. Generally meeting the same energy of how it is said and meeting the energy of how the message is meant to be conveyed publicly.

The thing is though how someone may answer in a setting like that vs one on one. In a setting of it being personal and the way their life and the other persons will interact in a manner of being harmonious or chaotic. I find that many times a persons public persona is influenced by many factors. Whereas who they are and how they answer in a personal setting is honestly more who they are as the only factor is, is that the life they want and can they live with it.
Alrighty, thanks for clarifying and thank you for your service!👨‍✈️ 🇺🇸

Really, if I were to tell a guy I'm independent, it would just be an effort to be upfront with him about how I am. Some guys prefer a girl who's more talkative, or one who would just accept their ideas without discussion. I'm not like that, and I don't think I could change at this point.

So I'd be trying to say that I won't be texting him every 5 minutes, I enjoy a good debate or collaboration, and can handle a solo trip to the craft store if he'd rather watch football. And apparently he might take it as "Go away bud, I don't want no man" 😂😬😭