Well aren't you just a big bowl of sunshine!
I know! i'm just bursting with bright positive energy! lol
and right now i'm giving away free samples
Well aren't you just a big bowl of sunshine!
He didn't have to give us any option. After all, He is God and not us.
I know! i'm just bursting with bright positive energy! lol
and right now i'm giving away free samples![]()
Is a fetus considered by God to be a human life.
By the way I was never much of a pro-life activist (or any kind of activist), but once I read the actual text of the US Supreme Court's latest ruling on partial-birth abortions -- which basically gives guidelines on how to slaughter a baby as he is born -- I was absolutely horrified.
And just look at one picture.
And if we could see a video, well.......... no person with any humanity could defend such human slaughter.
Now add to that that the main reason for all of it is simply as a means of "birth control" for those engaging in sexual sin. Well it certainly is "birth control", in a very literal (and horrifying) sense.
Self-centered, demanding, great and terrible, and jealous.
wow, those are bad relationship traits if i ever heard them xD
i mean some jealousy is good but not TOO much...
that relationship doesn't sound very healthy.
By week 6 in the womb the heart beats at 100-160/min.In Ex. 21:22-25, the fetus (unborn child in any stage of development) is called the "fruit" of the womb. It does not become "ripe" until it is born and has no spirit (breath) until it is born. The spirit is what goes to heaven, so miscarried, stillborn, and aborted fetuses cannot go to heaven because they have no spirit, it's as if they never were.
You are most likely a perfect example of one that did not need to be created.
19 years old mind full of mush. Perhaps you should have been aborted.
Anyone who needs to ask such a question is too stupid to live, and should have been aborted.
Human life is sacred, and should be treated as such. You should draw the line in the only safe place to draw the line: before conception.
Note that the US Supreme Court, in it's infinite wisdom, has drawn the line on the other end: birth. US federal law allows a baby to be ripped apart (literally) as it is being born, as long as it's not out past the navel. And the law explicitly states that if the baby accidentally gets out past the navel before they've successfully mutilated him/her, no crime has been committed because it was unintentional. (The atrocious murder is certainly intentional, so what they mean is that the slaughter of the baby is unintentionally completed after it's out past the navel.) You can't tell me that's not murder. Obama says that's only a small percentage of abortions. But I think if even one baby is slaughtered like that at birth, it should make national news. But it's normal for our country.
Also it's interesting that this question is only explored academically, without any video or even pictures of what abortion really is. I'm tempted to post a picture here but I'll refrain. But I'd like to see politicians debate this, with actual video and pictures. No one could defend it with a picture in front of them. But hey let's not look at what it really is.
Again, life is sacred and the only safe place to draw the line is before conception.
He also did not have to create us in the first place.
Do you think it would be better to give birth to all these unwanted children? What kind of life do you think they would have? God does not like abortion and if women were not commiting whoredom, premarital sex and adultery we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Do you think it would be better to give birth to all these unwanted children? What kind of life do you think they would have? God does not like abortion and if women were not commiting whoredom, premarital sex and adultery we wouldn't be having this discussion.