A
The earth is 6.000 years old.
Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?
Humans coexisted with dinosaurs.
Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?
There was a global flood 4,000 to 5,000 years ago.
Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?
T.rex didn't eat meat until after the fall, around 6,000 years ago.
Does ANYBODY see how stooooopid that sounds?!?
And on and on.
I think that you have a fetish with Dr. Hovind and no matter how may times you will rail on him people will believe what they want to believe......so crack in the box how is it going....any new tacos or burgers you have to peddle?
Can you please explain macro evolution to us through chemistry at a molecular level?When people on this site quit praising Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) to high heaven, I will quit bringing up the truth, like he is a convict.
Have you read Dr. Dino's Ph.D dissertation?
Whoever wrote that is not smarter than a 5th grader.
I thought you said that KJV was incorrect because LXX was correct.....you get that the LXX is correct from a KJV Bible?
If the Bible can be proven to be true - and that's what this movement is about, it seems, is proving the Bible is literal history - then what does one need faith for? Isn't that teaching people to evaluate the spiritual based on what they can see?
Can you please explain macro evolution to us through chemistry at a molecular level?
Kodiak! Look what I found!
![]()
Hope it helps.
lol, that doesn't explain it....the whole point of my question is evolution relies on macro evolution....yet no scientists can explain it at a molecular level and in relation to chemistry....Evolution could not happen using only micro evolution, yet no scientist can explain macro evolution.....Why should we believe something that is being pushed on us, yet cannot be explained?
liars lie.
"Methuselah, who lived 969 years (Genesis 5:27), longer than anyone else recorded. His father was Enoch, of whom it is said he "walked with God" (5:24) but who was taken to heaven without dying at 365 years. Methuselah's son Lamech died a few years before the Flood at 777 years (5:31) after bearing Noah. When Methuselah was born, his godly father must have prophetically known of coming things for his son's name means "when he dies, judgment," and interestingly enough, Methuselah died in the same year God judged the sinful world with the great Flood of Noah's day. "
I see you know how to copy and paste from the Institute for Creation Research website.
It would appear you are you calling the Septuagint (LXX) a lie.
The LXX that Jesus and the apostles quoted from.
Which indicates that Methuselah died 14 years after the Flood.
You are beating a dead horse.
What you don't seem to be able to comprehend is that the dead horse is not 6,000 years old. The dead horse is millions of years old.
There is no scientific evidence from any credible source that indicates there are fossils that prove dinosaurs coexisted with humans.
Here is what one of my sources says, Glen Kuban:
For many years claims were made by strict, "young-earth" creationists that human footprints or "giant man tracks" occur alongside fossilized dinosaur tracks in the limestone beds of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose Texas. If true, such a finding would dramatically contradict the conventional geologic timetable, which holds that humans did not appear on earth until over 60 million years after the dinosaurs became extinct. However, the "man track" claims have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and in recent years have been abandoned even by most creationists.
The supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including metatarsal dinosaur tracks, erosional features, and carvings. The largest number of "man tracks" are forms of elongate, metatarsal dinosaur tracks, made by bipedal dinosaurs that sometimes impressed their metatarsi (heels and soles) as they walked. When the digit impressions of such tracks are subdued by mud-backflow or secondary infilling, a somewhat human shape often results. Other alleged "man tracks" including purely erosional features (often selectively highlighted to encourage human shapes), indistinct marks of undertain origin, and a smaller number of doctored and carved tracks (most of the latter occurring on loose blocks of rock)
.
A few individuals such as Carl Baugh, Don Patton, and Ian Juby, continue to promote the Paluxy "man tracks" or alleged human tracks in Mesozoic or Paleozoic from other localities, but such claims are not considered credible by either mainstream scientists or major creationist groups. When examined thoroughly and carefully, the Paluxy tracks not only provide no positive evidence for young-earth creationism, but are found to be among many other lines of geologic evidence which indicate that the earth has had a long and complex history.
Paluxy Dinosaur/"Man Track" controversy
Do you dispute any of this information?
If so, please provide a link to your source.
You are quite fond of making statements of absolutes without offering any proof whatsoever of the veracity of your claims.
They never quoted from the LXX....I have done my research....
Evolution is a myth that has been debunked too many times, and yes you'll commonly hear their supporters using the Majority Mentality by saying most scientist believe in it therefore it is true......
Hmm ... two challenges go absolutely and completely ignored. How surprising ...
![]()
They never quoted from the LXX....I have done my research....