Job 10:1 My soul is weary of my life; I will leave my complaint upon myself; I will speak in the bitterness of my soul.
Notice the words “my soul” (twice), “my life,” and “my complaint.” Job’s soul was weary of, or loathed, his life. In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul informed us that Christians are of a dual nature: the new man and the old man. The new man is in the vessel of the old man. Stated another way, the new creature has a monkey on his back. Although Job did not realize the duality in quite the same way that Christians do, he felt the conflict. He was making a distinction between his soul and his life—his experience in the flesh. He was weary of the experience he was having in the flesh, which was taking him downhill. One perspective of Job’s saying, “I will leave my complaint upon myself,” was that he felt like giving up. The NIV is closer to the thought: “Therefore I will give free [loose] rein to my complaint.” When a rider wants his horse to gallop, he loosens and flaps both reins. Job would now do what he feared to do a little while ago. He would give free rein about his present situation.
Job 10:2 I will say unto God, Do not condemn me; show me wherefore thou contendest with me.
It is hard to see from the written statement that Job’s mood was beginning to change. He was softening under his experience and getting into a tender mode. Unfortunately, the various translations do not bring out the tenderness. “I will say unto Eloha”—not only to God in the singular (instead of Elohim) but to God in an “Abba, Father” mode. Job was appealing to God as 73 a Father but almost in a feminine gender. About 60 years ago, Brother Kirkwood gave a talk entitled “The Mother Love of God.” Certainly God is complete just as, on a much lower scale, Adam was complete and had a fullness before Eve was taken from him. The Heavenly Father has these traits, and even the Apostle Paul got in that mode when he yearned for those he had been privileged to bring into the truth, likening them to a fetus in the womb.
Under the crucible experience, Job was becoming a little more tenderized, and he was appealing to God something like Moses did. When God said to Moses, “Step aside and let me wipe out the Israelites,” Moses interceded and reasoned, “Oh no, do not do that. If you destroy the Israelites, people will say that you brought them out of Egypt but were not able to bring them into the Land of Promise.” Moses and Job were very unusual personages.
Job 10:3 Is it good unto thee that thou shouldest oppress, that thou shouldest despise the work of thine hands, and shine upon the counsel of the wicked?
Knowing what is coming in this chapter, we would like to word verse 3 a little differently: “Is it good for thee that thou shouldest crush me, that thou shouldest disregard [me] the work of thine hands, and shine [with favor] upon the counsel of the wrong?” The word “wicked” is a little too strong. In the New Testament, the term “the wicked” sometimes means “the lawless,” a lesser degree, and here Job was talking about the counsel of his comforters. He was not saying that they were wicked persons but that they were giving wrong counsel, bad advice. When Job’s comments are softened, another perspective is given; namely, he was beginning to emerge from the crucible as a different person.
Job 10:4 Hast thou eyes of flesh? or seest thou as man seeth? (5) Are thy days as the days of man? are thy years as man’s days, (6) That thou inquirest after mine iniquity, and searchest after my sin? The answer to the rhetorical questions of verses 4-6 is, “Of course not.” Similarly, Paul asked, “Should we sin so that the grace of God may abound?” (Rom. 6:1 paraphrase). (7) Thou knowest that I am not wicked; and there is none that can deliver out of thine hand. (8) Thine hands have made me and fashioned me together round about; yet thou dost destroy me.(9) Remember, I beseech thee, that thou hast made me as the clay; and wilt thou bring me into dust again?
The wording in verses 7-9 is tender, as some other translations bring out. Job was talking about the skill with which the Heavenly Father made man and the delicate operation of bringing all the functional parts together in such a marvelous fashion. It was like David’s asking, “What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?” (Psa. 8:4). To a certain extent, David and Job glorified even the physical creation that God had made.
Job was trying to reason with God but not in a combative mood. “There is none [and Job included himself] that can deliver out of thine hand. Thine hands have shaped me and knit me together like a garment. Remember, I beseech thee, that thou hast made me as clay, and to dust wilt thou again bring me?” Job was pleading, and his sense of judgment was beginning to set in that there was some reason for his experience. His faith was groping for a handle on the matter. He was getting closer and closer to a realization but was not satisfied yet. He felt that 74 he was innocent and that God knew of his innocence.
Job 10:10 Hast thou not poured me out as milk, and curdled me like cheese? (11) Thou hast clothed me with skin and flesh, and hast fenced me with bones and sinews.
Job was talking about his own bodily appearance and shameful experience. He felt as if he had been poured out like milk and curdled like cheese; that is, he felt exposed. Some commentators give a very technical explanation about the body itself and how wondrously man is made, but Job was talking about himself, as some ensuing verses will verify.
Imagine seeing Job as he was speaking. We should keep in mind that he had not eaten any food for seven days, and now he was speaking for the second time. Since he had a disease, his skin was probably wrinkled, and his sinews showed. Depending on the circumstance, someone who is starving may have either a swollen belly or the opposite. In this case, Job was apparently skin and bones. When a person loses a lot of weight, the skin takes on a rather strange appearance. And Job’s skin was darkened somewhat (Job 30:30). Therefore, in verses 10 and 11, he was recognizing his deplorable state.