In his book "Judaism's Strange God's" Michael Hoffman says:
"the rabbis drafted a powerful counternarrative that was meant to shake the foundations of the Christian message for, according to them, Jesus was not born from a virgin, as his followers claim, but out of wedlock, the son of a whore and her lover; therefore, he could not be the messiah of Davidic descent, let alone the Son of God." (Schafer, Jesus in the Talmud, Princeton University Press, 2007, pp. 8-10.
By the twenty-first century, long-standing denials by Talmudists and Zionists and their gentile apologists concerning Jesus in the Talmud were slowly being discredited after having held sway over Christians for decades. Judaism's new story line, as of this writing, is to pretend there never were any significant denials and that, of course negative portrayals of Christ are in the Talmud and the rabbis have never denied it. They just "obscured" it "a little"."
I have Michael Hoffman’s books: “Judaism's Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded” and “Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit”
Some quotes from Michael Hoffman’s book: “Judaism's Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded”
"Most of the laws of the religion of Judaism have no Biblical
warrant; they contradict and nullify the word of God.
Where the sufficiency of Scripture is denied, the fallacies and
imaginings of man come to the fore. The Talmud is one of the
largest collections of such fancies and human error; sometimes
intriguing and colorful, titillating the senses with the
phantasmagoria of the Aggadah, but more often sordid,
blasphemous and asinine, in spite of the intellectual prestige
accorded its rabbinic authors."
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
Mat 15:3-9, “But He answering, said to them, “Why do you also transgress the command of YHWH because of your tradition? For YHWH has commanded, saying, ‘Respect your father and your mother,’ ‘He who curses father or mother, let him be put to death.’ But you say, ‘Whoever says to his father or mother, “Whatever profit you might have received from me has been dedicated, is certainly released from respecting his father or mother.’ So you have nullified the command of YHWH by your tradition."Hypocrites! Well did Isayah (29:13-14*) prophesy of you, saying: These people draw near to Me with their mouth and honor Me with their lips, but have removed their hearts far from Me. But in vain they do worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men." [/FONT]
"The religion of Judaism as it has been known since it was concocted
after the crucifixion of Christ is what is called "Orthodox" Judaism
today.The early Church recognized Christianity as having been founded by
Israelites and representing the only true religion of the Bible. It is
Christians who are "a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy
nation..." (I Peter 2:9). Judaism was not viewed as the repository of the spiritual truths or
knowledge of the Old Testament, but as a post-Biblical, Babylonian cult
totally at variance with Biblical Christianity."
"A common rabbinic defense against criticism of the more
blatantly horrible passages in the Talmud, is the allegation that the
Talmud is merely a record of debates (mahloket) between tanna'im
and amora'm8 and that by seizing on one portion of the controversy
and upholding that passage as authoritative, the critic errs, for no
Talmudic sanction is given to either side of the debate in Talmud.
This is disingenuous, since the Mishnah and key Talmudic
amplifications of it, comprise dogmatic Jewish law (halakhah) by
which every believing orthodox Jewish person is enslaved down to
the most minute and intimate particulars of his or her daily life.
How Talmudic law is deduced and adjudicated is often a mystery
to the non-Judaic mentality, but that it constitutes halakhah is
undeniable.The key point here is that the appearance of Talmudic
indeterminacy does not preclude law-making by majority
rabbinical consensus, which is the process by which Talmudic law
is formed, both in terms of the decision on what constituted the
oral law of the elders as presented in the Mishnah (halakhah
lemosheh misinai), as well as the subsequent Mitzuot derabanan
(rabbinical commandments) found in the Gemara, arising from the
deductive process known as Midot shehatorah nidreshet bahen."
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
New International Version - Mat 23:2-3, "The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat. So you must be careful to do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
King James Bible - Mat 23:2-3, "Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
Shem Tob's Hebrew Mattithyah - Mat 23:2-3, "The Pharisees and Sages sit upon the seat of Mosheh. Therefore, all that he (Mosheh) says to you, diligently do, but according to their takanot (reforms) and their ma'asim (precedents) do not do, because they talk (Torah) but they do not do."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
Takanot: rabbinical reforms or enactments that falsely change or add to YHWH's Law.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
Ma'asim: acts or deeds that serve as precedents for rabbinic law.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
Both Takanot and Ma'asim are laws of the Talmud.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]
Mat 23:8, “But you, do not be called ‘Rabbi, (master)’ for One is your Master, the Messiah, and you are all brothers.”[/FONT]
"The American system of jurisprudence has degenerated from
courts that ruled according to God's law, to courts that make the
law through judicial interpretation and case law (precedent). The
latter is entirely Talmudic and reflects the subversion of our
nation: "The growth of Talmudic Law, in all its aspects, was for the
most part, the work of judicial interpretation rather than of
formal legislation... The judge served in effect as aP. 14 Judaism's Strange Gods
creator of law and not only as its interpreter..."9
To better investigate the root of the confusion about Judaism, let
us now examine a classic statement of modern Protestantism's
view of Judaism, as presented by conservative Presbyterian
theologian Douglas Jones: "...consider the case of Abraham, that ancient father of Judaism
and Christianity...One of the best ways of beginning to think about
the nature of Christianity is to think of it in the light of Judaism.
"Today, we so often think of Judaism and Christianity as two
distinct religions, almost like Buddhism and Islam. But early
Christianity never saw itself in that way. The earliest Christians
saw themselves as faithful Jews simply following Jewish teachings.
In fact, the first main dispute in the Christian church was whether
non-Jews, the Gentiles, could even be a part of Christianity!
"Christianity self-consciously saw itself as the continuing
outgrowth, the fulfillment, of true Judaism. As such, Christianity
didn't start in the first century but long before with King David,
Moses, Abraham, and ultimately the first man, Adam. Everything
in older Judaism was building up and pointing to the work of Jesus
Christ. Over and over, the early disciples explained that Christ was
the fulfillment of the ancient promises of Judaism.
"...So when we start thinking about Christianity, we have to
understand its very Jewish roots. We should assume that Christianity
ought to look and sound like Judaism except when it explicitly
claims to change something. We should expect that the Scriptures,
institutions, basic principles, laws, meditations, family life, etc. of
Judaism would carry over into Christianity, unless Christ, the final
prophet, authoritatively changed a practice....Christianity's
Jewishness is pervasive indeed."
Do you have his book “The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome” and if so do you recommend it?