Just commentaries on the psalms of David. Share your thought and inspirations.
- Thread starter OMC
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Psalm 11 is David’s refusal to flee when the foundations look like they’re collapsing — a declaration that faith doesn’t retreat just because the wicked seem to have the high ground. The psalm opens with the challenge: “Flee as a bird to your mountain,” the counsel of fear, the voice that says the righteous are doomed because the enemy has the bow drawn and the foundations are shaking. David rejects it outright. His thesis is simple and immovable: the Lord is in His holy temple, His throne is in heaven, meaning the apparent chaos on earth hasn’t displaced the actual throne that governs reality. God sees, tests, and distinguishes — the righteous He approves, the wicked He hates, and His judgment is not theoretical but inevitable. The psalm ends with the core punchline: the upright will behold His face, meaning perseverance isn’t grounded in circumstances but in the certainty of God’s character and the final outcome He guarantees.
Psalm 12 is David’s cry that when human faithfulness collapses, the Lord Himself rises to defend the oppressed and preserve His words forever.
The psalm moves in three tight movements: the disappearance of the faithful, the domination of the wicked through deceitful speech, and God’s decisive intervention to protect His people with His pure, flawless words.
David opens with the lament that “the godly man ceaseth” and “the faithful fail,” meaning society has reached a point where truth‑tellers and covenant‑keepers have become rare.
The wicked fill the vacuum with flattering lips, double hearts, and boastful claims of autonomy—speech becomes the weapon of oppression.
God responds by declaring that He will arise for the poor and needy, promising protection not through human institutions but through His own action.
The center of the psalm is the contrast between human words (lying, flattering, manipulative) and the Lord’s words, which are “pure… as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.” The purity metaphor means God’s promises are completely trustworthy, without alloy, and therefore the foundation for hope when society’s speech is corrupt.
The psalm closes with realism: the wicked still strut when vileness is exalted, but the righteous cling to the certainty that God preserves His people and His words in every generation.
Psalm 12 is therefore a theology of speech—false speech destroys, divine speech preserves—and a reminder that God’s intervention is anchored in the reliability of His own promises.
The psalm moves in three tight movements: the disappearance of the faithful, the domination of the wicked through deceitful speech, and God’s decisive intervention to protect His people with His pure, flawless words.
David opens with the lament that “the godly man ceaseth” and “the faithful fail,” meaning society has reached a point where truth‑tellers and covenant‑keepers have become rare.
The wicked fill the vacuum with flattering lips, double hearts, and boastful claims of autonomy—speech becomes the weapon of oppression.
God responds by declaring that He will arise for the poor and needy, promising protection not through human institutions but through His own action.
The center of the psalm is the contrast between human words (lying, flattering, manipulative) and the Lord’s words, which are “pure… as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.” The purity metaphor means God’s promises are completely trustworthy, without alloy, and therefore the foundation for hope when society’s speech is corrupt.
The psalm closes with realism: the wicked still strut when vileness is exalted, but the righteous cling to the certainty that God preserves His people and His words in every generation.
Psalm 12 is therefore a theology of speech—false speech destroys, divine speech preserves—and a reminder that God’s intervention is anchored in the reliability of His own promises.
Psalm 13 is David’s six‑verse descent into despair and ascent into trust: he begins with the quadruple “How long…?” complaint (vv.1–2), showing the covenant tension between God’s promises and David’s lived experience; he then petitions for illumination — “Enlighten my eyes, lest I sleep the sleep of death” (v.3) — grounding his plea in God’s character rather than his circumstances; he anticipates the enemy’s gloating if God does not act (v.4); and he resolves the psalm with the decisive pivot — “But I have trusted in Your mercy; my heart shall rejoice in Your salvation” (v.5) — ending in vowed praise (v.6). The structure is the theology: complaint → petition → confidence.
Psa. 5:1. Give ear to my words, O Lord, Listen to my cry for help. Briefly, prayer is simply addressing one’s thoughts to God, which is half of our relationship with Him. We should express our agreement with the perfect will of God, as 1 John 5:14 says and as Jesus exemplified when He prayed in the Garden of Gethsemane (Matt. 26:36-46). In order to pray in accordance with God’s will, we must know God’s Word (John 15:7). Like bread and butter or romantic love and spiritual marriage, prayer and learning GW go together. The reason for this series of lessons on key teachings in the OT is so that we may understand God’s will and become mature believers.
Psa. 6:1-4. “O Lord, do not discipline me in your wrath, [but rather] save me because of your unfailing love.” Like a parent, sometimes God’s love is expressed by wrath or discipline that is intended to teach us the right way to believe and behave. Paul noted this in Heb. 12:5-6, where he quoted Pro. 3:11-12, “My son, do not make light of the Lord’s discipline, and do not lose heart when he rebukes you, because the Lord disciplines those he loves, and he punishes everyone he accepts as a son [or child].” An explanation of the biblical teaching that God is just/righteous/loving is called theodicy.
Psalm 5 isn’t “prayer equals thoughts to God”; it’s covenant appeal: David calls for God’s attention (vv.1–2), stands in morning‑sacrifice order (v.3), contrasts God’s holiness with the wicked (vv.4–6), enters by mercy (v.7), asks for righteous guidance (v.8), and invokes judgment on covenant violators (vv.9–10).
Your framing shifts prayer into relational sentiment and maturity‑development, which Scripture never uses here.
World‑system: your description reflects System 3 (devotional sentimentalism);
Psalm 5 itself operates in System 1 (covenant‑juridical appeal).
Psalm 6:1–4 is David begging God to withhold wrath, not describing routine parental discipline: he fears being treated as an enemy under judgment and pleads for mercy on the basis of God’s steadfast love.
Hebrews 12 and Proverbs 3 describe fatherly discipline for sons, but Psalm 6 is a covenant‑court appeal for God to turn anger aside. World‑system: your interpretation reflects System 3 (therapeutic‑devotional),
while the psalm itself operates in System 1 (covenant‑juridical).
Psa. 8:2. “From the lips of children and infants you have ordained praise.”
This verse is cited by Jesus in Matt. 21:16 in reply to the chief priests and teachers of the law being upset by children in the temple area shouting “Hosanna to the Son of David!” The verse refers to very young and therefore innocent children praising God, which would be by shouting “hallelujah”, meaning “praise the Lord”, whereas “hosanna” means “O Lord, save us” (as in Psa. 118:25).
However, the children Jesus heard apparently were echoing what their parents shouted as Jesus entered Jerusalem (in Matt. 21:9), “Hosanna to the Son of David!”, which was an appellation for Messiah/Christ (as in Matt. 22:41-42, cf. Matt. 12:23). In Matt. 22:43 Jesus identified Messiah as the Lord.
Psa. 8:4-6. “What is man?”
Mankind is God’s steward over His creation (per Gen. 9:7-17, discussed previously). The Bible does not really address the question of mankind’s stewardship in detail, but I hope it is evident that if we should take care of our bodies because they are the temple of the HS (1Cor. 3:16-17), then we should take care of our world, because the environment affects the health of our bodies.
This verse is cited by Jesus in Matt. 21:16 in reply to the chief priests and teachers of the law being upset by children in the temple area shouting “Hosanna to the Son of David!” The verse refers to very young and therefore innocent children praising God, which would be by shouting “hallelujah”, meaning “praise the Lord”, whereas “hosanna” means “O Lord, save us” (as in Psa. 118:25).
However, the children Jesus heard apparently were echoing what their parents shouted as Jesus entered Jerusalem (in Matt. 21:9), “Hosanna to the Son of David!”, which was an appellation for Messiah/Christ (as in Matt. 22:41-42, cf. Matt. 12:23). In Matt. 22:43 Jesus identified Messiah as the Lord.
Psa. 8:4-6. “What is man?”
Mankind is God’s steward over His creation (per Gen. 9:7-17, discussed previously). The Bible does not really address the question of mankind’s stewardship in detail, but I hope it is evident that if we should take care of our bodies because they are the temple of the HS (1Cor. 3:16-17), then we should take care of our world, because the environment affects the health of our bodies.
Psalm 8:2 is not about “innocent children praising God”;
David says God ordains strength (not “cute praise”) from infants to silence enemies, which Jesus applies in Matt 21:16 to show that the Messiah receives worship even from the least, and that the priests’ rejection fulfills the psalm’s contrast between enemies and the weak whom God empowers.
The children shouting “Hosanna” are not offering generic praise; they are declaring messianic kingship (Ps 118:25–26), which is why Jesus cites Psalm 8 — their cry is God‑ordained testimony against unbelief.
Psalm 8:4–6 is not about environmental stewardship; it is David marveling that God grants man dominion (Gen 1:26–28), a dominion the NT says is ultimately fulfilled in Christ (Heb 2:5–9).
Caring for creation may be wise, but Psalm 8 is messianic dominion, not ecological ethics.
World‑system diagnosis: your reading reflects System 3 (devotional‑practical moralism), where texts become lessons about innocence and stewardship;
Psalm 8 itself operates in System 1 (covenant‑juridical + messianic dominion), where God uses the weak to shame the strong and grants rule to the Son of Man.
Psa. 9:10. “You, Lord, have never forsaken those who seek you“.
We can take this as an OT precedent for the teaching of Jesus in Matt. 7:7, “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find”.
Or in the words of Heb. 11:6, “Anyone who comes to [God] must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.”
This is a statement of God’s requirement for salvation (GRFS) that is relevant especially for those who never had the opportunity to hear the gospel about Jesus.
We can take this as an OT precedent for the teaching of Jesus in Matt. 7:7, “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find”.
Or in the words of Heb. 11:6, “Anyone who comes to [God] must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.”
This is a statement of God’s requirement for salvation (GRFS) that is relevant especially for those who never had the opportunity to hear the gospel about Jesus.
Psalm 14 is God’s courtroom verdict on the world‑system: the fool says in his heart “there is no God,” and that inward denial produces corruption, injustice, and a universal diagnosis — “there is none that doeth good,” “none that seek after God.”
Paul cites this exact psalm in Romans 3 to prove total depravity, not as a poetic exaggeration but as God’s forensic assessment of humanity outside His grace.
The psalm also exposes the system’s blindness: the wicked “devour my people as bread” because they assume God is absent, yet the text flips the lens — “God is in the generation of the righteous,” meaning the righteous are preserved because God is present with them even when the world thinks He isn’t.
The final line is the eschatological hope: salvation comes “out of Zion,” not from human reform, and when God restores His people, Jacob rejoices and Israel is glad — the rescue is divine, not cultural, not political, not mystical.
Paul cites this exact psalm in Romans 3 to prove total depravity, not as a poetic exaggeration but as God’s forensic assessment of humanity outside His grace.
The psalm also exposes the system’s blindness: the wicked “devour my people as bread” because they assume God is absent, yet the text flips the lens — “God is in the generation of the righteous,” meaning the righteous are preserved because God is present with them even when the world thinks He isn’t.
The final line is the eschatological hope: salvation comes “out of Zion,” not from human reform, and when God restores His people, Jacob rejoices and Israel is glad — the rescue is divine, not cultural, not political, not mystical.
Psa. 10:1. “Why, O Lord, do you stand far off? Why do you hide yourself in times of trouble?” This question arises again in Psa. 13:1-2 and in 22:1, which says “My God, my God why have you forsaken me?” You will recognize that Jesus quoted this Psalm when He was on the cross. Even the Son of God felt distant from God the Father during His crucifixion, which is why this truth has been called “distanciation” by some theologians.
The truth is that we walk by faith (2Cor. 5:7), and that God does not normatively or as His “SOP” prove He exists by performing miracles that make faith unnecessary. In fact, we are warned against being deceived by counterfeit miracles of Satan (2Thes. 2:9) performed by false prophets (Matt. 24:24). Faith implies IF, God's condition for salvation: sinners are saved IF they exercise MFW to have saving Faith. Thus, the answer to the question in this Psalm is logically implied by Paul's mention of faith. The essential aspect of being a human rather than a robot or subhuman creature is faith/moral free will (MFW), which is what enables a person to experience love and meaning. This is what makes humans different from animals, whose behavior is governed mainly by instinct. This is what it means to be created in God’s image (Gen. 1:26-27).
God could not force people to return His love without abrogating their humanity. If God were to zap ungodly souls, it would be tantamount to forcing conversions at gunpoint, which would not be free and genuine. If God were to prevent people from behaving hatefully, then He would need to prevent them from believing/thinking evilly, which would make human souls programmed automatons. Thus, for reasons we may understand only sufficiently rather than completely, God designed reality so that experiencing His presence is less than compelling, so that even Jesus (God the Son) on the cross cried out “My God [the Father], why have you forsaken [taken God the Spirit from] me?” (Matt. 27:46, Psa. 51:11) This phenomenon is sometimes called “distanciation”, because we experience God as distant from us and “unknown” (Acts 17:23), even though He is close or immanent, “for in Him we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17:28). Distanciation is not forsaken.
God’s normative means of conversion is persuasion rather than coercion (Matt. 12:39, 24:24, 1Cor. 1:22-23). This is seen very clearly in Jesus’ lament over the obstinacy of Jerusalem (Matt. 23:37). Two unusual theophanies included when God appeared to Moses (in a burning bush per Exo. 3:2-6), whom God wanted to establish the Jewish lineage for the Messiah (OT), and to Saul/Paul (as the resurrected Jesus in Acts 9:3-6), whom God chose to establish the NT church of Christ. Miracles are rare (not normative).
MFW/Faith/IF only exists when there is the possibility of choosing between two qualitatively opposite moral options that we call good and evil. These options are opposites because of essentially different consequences for choosing them. Choosing good results in blessing, life and heaven; and choosing evil results in cursing, death and hell (Deut. 30:19). This is why hell as well as heaven exists. It is the just consequence for choosing evil rather than God. The Spirit of God is good: love, peace and joy (Gal. 5:22-23). Therefore, whoever rejects the Lord is spiritually separated from Him (Isa. 59:2) and thereby chooses the evil or satanic spirit of hatred, strife and misery and reaps the just consequence called “hell” in the afterlife (Gal. 6:7-9, Heb. 9:27-28). These options were presented by Moses to the Israelites (Deut. 30:19), and Jesus referred to this fundamental choice in terms of a fish or egg versus a snake or scorpion (Luke 11:11-13). Life… or Curse? (Gen. 3:24, Rev. 22:1-2)
God created theoretical evil or the possibility of rejecting Him as an option that actualizes IF/faith/MFW/free human personality. As such it is necessary and even good (Gen. 1:31). Of course, it was wrong for Satan (1John 3:8) and humanity (Rom. 5:12) to make evil actual by choosing to Sin or reject Faith in God’s Lordship. Sin: ignoring God/God’s Word. God loves a cheerful giver (2Cor. 9:7), which means He desires people to cooperate with Him happily because of love and gratitude for His grace rather than to cower before Him because of fear of hell. Love must be evoked; it cannot be coerced. And again, when souls sin or do NOT choose to love God freely, it is perfectly just (loving and logical) for them to reap the appropriate consequence (Gal. 6:7-9) or hell.
The truth is that we walk by faith (2Cor. 5:7), and that God does not normatively or as His “SOP” prove He exists by performing miracles that make faith unnecessary. In fact, we are warned against being deceived by counterfeit miracles of Satan (2Thes. 2:9) performed by false prophets (Matt. 24:24). Faith implies IF, God's condition for salvation: sinners are saved IF they exercise MFW to have saving Faith. Thus, the answer to the question in this Psalm is logically implied by Paul's mention of faith. The essential aspect of being a human rather than a robot or subhuman creature is faith/moral free will (MFW), which is what enables a person to experience love and meaning. This is what makes humans different from animals, whose behavior is governed mainly by instinct. This is what it means to be created in God’s image (Gen. 1:26-27).
God could not force people to return His love without abrogating their humanity. If God were to zap ungodly souls, it would be tantamount to forcing conversions at gunpoint, which would not be free and genuine. If God were to prevent people from behaving hatefully, then He would need to prevent them from believing/thinking evilly, which would make human souls programmed automatons. Thus, for reasons we may understand only sufficiently rather than completely, God designed reality so that experiencing His presence is less than compelling, so that even Jesus (God the Son) on the cross cried out “My God [the Father], why have you forsaken [taken God the Spirit from] me?” (Matt. 27:46, Psa. 51:11) This phenomenon is sometimes called “distanciation”, because we experience God as distant from us and “unknown” (Acts 17:23), even though He is close or immanent, “for in Him we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17:28). Distanciation is not forsaken.
God’s normative means of conversion is persuasion rather than coercion (Matt. 12:39, 24:24, 1Cor. 1:22-23). This is seen very clearly in Jesus’ lament over the obstinacy of Jerusalem (Matt. 23:37). Two unusual theophanies included when God appeared to Moses (in a burning bush per Exo. 3:2-6), whom God wanted to establish the Jewish lineage for the Messiah (OT), and to Saul/Paul (as the resurrected Jesus in Acts 9:3-6), whom God chose to establish the NT church of Christ. Miracles are rare (not normative).
MFW/Faith/IF only exists when there is the possibility of choosing between two qualitatively opposite moral options that we call good and evil. These options are opposites because of essentially different consequences for choosing them. Choosing good results in blessing, life and heaven; and choosing evil results in cursing, death and hell (Deut. 30:19). This is why hell as well as heaven exists. It is the just consequence for choosing evil rather than God. The Spirit of God is good: love, peace and joy (Gal. 5:22-23). Therefore, whoever rejects the Lord is spiritually separated from Him (Isa. 59:2) and thereby chooses the evil or satanic spirit of hatred, strife and misery and reaps the just consequence called “hell” in the afterlife (Gal. 6:7-9, Heb. 9:27-28). These options were presented by Moses to the Israelites (Deut. 30:19), and Jesus referred to this fundamental choice in terms of a fish or egg versus a snake or scorpion (Luke 11:11-13). Life… or Curse? (Gen. 3:24, Rev. 22:1-2)
God created theoretical evil or the possibility of rejecting Him as an option that actualizes IF/faith/MFW/free human personality. As such it is necessary and even good (Gen. 1:31). Of course, it was wrong for Satan (1John 3:8) and humanity (Rom. 5:12) to make evil actual by choosing to Sin or reject Faith in God’s Lordship. Sin: ignoring God/God’s Word. God loves a cheerful giver (2Cor. 9:7), which means He desires people to cooperate with Him happily because of love and gratitude for His grace rather than to cower before Him because of fear of hell. Love must be evoked; it cannot be coerced. And again, when souls sin or do NOT choose to love God freely, it is perfectly just (loving and logical) for them to reap the appropriate consequence (Gal. 6:7-9) or hell.
Your entire argument collapses at the hinge: you treat faith as a human‑generated IF‑condition that requires God to maintain “distanciation” so humans can exercise MFW, but Scripture never defines faith as a self‑originating moral power, never defines God’s “distance” as a metaphysical necessity for free will, and never defines the image of God as libertarian choice; instead, it defines faith as given (Phil 1:29),
authored (Heb 12:2),
assigned (Rom 12:3),
granted through revelation (Matt 16:17), and
created by the Spirit (2 Cor 4:6), and
it defines the image of God as knowledge, righteousness, and holiness (Eph 4:24; Col 3:10), not the ability to choose evil.
Psalm 10, 13, and 22 do not teach “distanciation” as God’s SOP; they express the experiential cry of the righteous under suffering, and Psalm 22 itself proves the opposite of your claim because the same Psalm that begins with “Why have You forsaken me?” ends with vindication, answered prayer, and worldwide salvation (Ps 22:24–31), meaning the “forsaking” is perceived, not ontological.
Jesus’ cry on the cross is not evidence of divine withdrawal but the deliberate citation of a messianic Psalm to reveal that He is the righteous sufferer fulfilling Scripture (Matt 27:46; John 19:28), and the Spirit was not removed from Him (John 3:34).
Your system requires God to hide Himself to preserve human autonomy, but Scripture says the opposite: sinners fail to see God because they hide (Gen 3:8),
they suppress truth (Rom 1:18),
they are blind (2 Cor 4:4),
God overcomes that blindness by opening hearts (Acts 16:14),
drawing (John 6:44),
calling (Rom 8:30), and giving life (Eph 2:5).
You argue that love must be uncoerced, but Scripture says love is poured into our hearts by the Spirit (Rom 5:5), not manufactured by human moral freedom.
You argue that hell is the “just consequence” of choosing evil, but Scripture says hell is the judgment of those who refuse to obey the gospel (2 Thess 1:8), and obedience to the gospel is itself a gifted faith (Rom 10:16–17).
Your entire MFW/IF framework is a philosophical system imposed on the text;
The biblical system is simpler:
humans are dead (Eph 2:1),
blind (2 Cor 4:4),
hostile (Rom 8:7),
unable (Rom 3:11), and
God saves by sovereign mercy (Rom 9:16),
producing the faith He commands,
preserving the faith He gives, and finishing the faith He authors — which means faith is not the condition that activates grace but the evidence that grace has already acted, and Psalm 22 is not proof of divine distance but proof that God hears, answers, and vindicates His suffering Son.
I share what I believe to be divine insight given by the Holy Spirit,
but you are free to disagree, import your words and refuse to learn.
God will judge whose opinion is better and which belief will be burned at the pearly gate.
Psa. 11:6-7. Different (opposite) ultimate destinies await those who are evil and those who serve God. This passage describes hell by saying “On the wicked [God] will rain fiery coals and burning sulfur; a scorching wind will be their lot.” But we find a hint of heaven when it says, “upright men will see [God’s] face.”
A clearer reference to heaven is found a few Psalms later in Psa. 16:10-11, which says “You will not abandon me to the grave; you will fill me with joy in your presence, with eternal pleasures at your right hand.” (Also see Psa. 17:15.)
We might compare these verses with John 3:18, which says “Whoever believes in [God’s Son] is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already.”
We have already seen this teaching when we discussed Deut. 30:19, “I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses.”
Now choose life!