The reason he was called out is that we both agree that the law of God is to be understood spiritually. Spiritual motivation is the catalyst of living according to the motive of the spiritual persuasion.
Obviously, there are some who have determined that both of us are incorrect in this train of thought, and that we are anti-grace people teaching against grace. To me it's quite ironic that grace came from "The ONE" law giver, and by attributing both grace and law together, that makes us wrong.
This verse says that KennethC is seeing it right. The question; what is the mind of those that differ with him?
Romans 8:6-7
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
Obviously, there are some who have determined that both of us are incorrect in this train of thought, and that we are anti-grace people teaching against grace. To me it's quite ironic that grace came from "The ONE" law giver, and by attributing both grace and law together, that makes us wrong.
This verse says that KennethC is seeing it right. The question; what is the mind of those that differ with him?
Romans 8:6-7
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
I respect the sincerity of both these men as much as I disagree with (what I see as) the implications of their position.
While I certainly confess to a strong disagreement with what they teach; no disrespect was intended and none seems to have been taken.