@Roger316 - sorry, I meant my post to @KroogzI hope you'll note my mention of the essence of Crabtree's remarks about proof-texting, which IMO were very good. See my most recent post to @Genez
@Roger316 - sorry, I meant my post to @KroogzI hope you'll note my mention of the essence of Crabtree's remarks about proof-texting, which IMO were very good. See my most recent post to @Genez
Why are you so keen to "prove" that a Christian can lose their salvation? Is there some perverse satisfaction that you get in trying to undermine someone's faith? It is the exact opposite of what believers should be doing.You see OSAS in this verse where exactly - where does it say someone cannot walk away or that justification is forever?
Please explain.
Same question.
Plus, since I know you're not Reformed, are you going to now explain foreknowledge and predestination?
Will you also explain how and why we're now glorified in light of verses like Rom8:17 and in light of Rom8:28 that puts this into the context of God's prothesis - God's advance plan / divine purpose?
And I can go on asking you questions and requesting you explain Scripture apart from simply asserting they substantiate your presupposition.
Can you provide and explain Scripture that proves without a doubt that He doesn't?
So, you want to join in on the poor reasoning with personal attacks...Why are you so keen to "prove" that a Christian can lose their salvation? Is there some perverse satisfaction that you get in trying to undermine someone's faith? It is the exact opposite of what believers should be doing.
Dr. Crabtree's view concerning the narrative structure of creation is the key piece of the puzzle that helped me make sense of sovereignty vs. freewill.No disrespect but I ended yesterday smiling at how a simple discussion and taking a certain position on mainly a single issue and a couple pieces of yet unanswered Scripture, end up being in the position of being pulled in several directions from different points of doctrine. So, I'm going to self-limit for awhile and stay on-point.
I will say that a quick read through this leaves me with this: I think I see Crabtree's philosophical determinism; I don't agree with monergism or monergism + compatibilism; God's finalized Plan is intact and remains intact no matter what, but endurance and perseverance is commanded, explained, and thus IMO is volitional, and as I just posted re: the "endure to the end will be saved" Scripture, endurance in itself is a topic worthy of more extensive discussion. All this to say I don't accept Perseverance of the Saints doctrine.
I hope you'll note my mention of the essence of Crabtree's remarks about proof-texting, which IMO were very good. See my most recent post to @Genez
Faith Alone is a slogan we inherited from the Reformers.Basic Faith-Alone of which there is little if any disagreement as far as this statement goes.
Understood. Yet you'd agree that it is determinism and thus understand why others reject the entire model, correct?Dr. Crabtree's view concerning the narrative structure of creation is the key piece of the puzzle that helped me make sense of sovereignty vs. freewill.
Faith (rightly understood) in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9) must not be confused with an empty profession of faith/dead faith that remains "alone" barren of works. (James 2:14-26)Faith Alone is a slogan we inherited from the Reformers.If Dr. Crabtree is right, the slogan should have been "Santified Alone" based on the Greek meaning of "hagios": selected for a divine purpose.
Also understood with the same question/comment.Faith Alone is a slogan we inherited from the Reformers.If Dr. Crabtree is right, the slogan should have been "Santified Alone" based on the Greek meaning of "hagios": selected for a divine purpose.
As I said before, Reformers were good exegetes of scripture, but they were bad at philosophy. The truth must account for both God's sovereignty and Human freedom.And there it begins - Reformed vs. what is essentially Free-Grace Faith-Alone.
On the merry-go-round...
Couldn't have scripted it better.
Another page in His book this day - huh @Roger316?
'rightly understood' being the key that the theological system you advocate does not have.Faith (rightly understood) in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9) must not be confused with an empty profession of faith/dead faith that remains "alone" barren of works. (James 2:14-26)
And some who go way back to the ECF say the Reformers were not such great exegetes. And some say exegesis was harmed by Greek Philosophy. And some say....As I said before, Reformers were good exegetes of scripture, but they were bad at philosophy. The truth must account for both God's sovereignty and Human freedom.
That's right, and I agree with you as far as it goes. You added an important qualifier: our faith must be genuine.Faith (rightly understood) in Jesus Christ "alone" for salvation (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9) must not be confused with an empty profession of faith/dead faith that remains "alone" barren of works. (James 2:14-26)
Now you have my attention.'rightly understood' being the key that the theological system you advocate does not have.
The key is Ephesians 2:5 - even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9) then we become His workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto/for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.That's right, and I agree with you as far as it goes. You added an important qualifier: our faith must be genuine.
The slogan "Faith-Alone", properly understood, is true, but incomplete because Jesus talked about being "born-again" which seems like another, distinct, aspect of Salvation. Would you agree?
keep watching and pushing re: what Faith is and is not.Now you have my attention.
That is where they screw up big time.And would also mean that salvation isn't completely dependent Jesus Christ (the Savior) and His works, but instead, upon man and his works.
His return is at the end of the Tribulation to set up His kingdom on earth.What do your statements have to do with your question? Of course Adam and Eve weren’t Christians, they also weren’t Jews. Judaism didn’t begin till millenniums later. They were the first 2 humans on this planet.
To answer your question regarding Matt. 24:9-13, Jesus was talking to the 11 disciples on the Mount of Olives about what the signs would be before He returns. He was eluding to what future Christians would go through, and warning that we would be hated by the world for His name sake (which is true, we have various levels of persecution, depending on where we live).
Ephesians 2:5 is too often overlooked. This is regeneration which leads to all that follows.The key is Ephesians 2:5 - even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9) then we become His workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto/for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.
Faith is the root of salvation and good works are the fruit. No fruit at all would demonstrate there is no room. Hence, James 2:14 - says/claims to have faith but has no works. Can that faith save? The answer is no because that is not genuine faith but a bare profession of faith. Hence, incomplete.
But isn't being born again a qualitatively distinct concept from faith?The key is Ephesians 2:5 - even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8,9) then we become His workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto/for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.
Faith is the root of salvation and good works are the fruit. No fruit at all would demonstrate there is no room. Hence, James 2:14 - says/claims to have faith but has no works. Can that faith save? The answer is no because that is not genuine faith but a bare profession of faith. Hence, incomplete.
Jesus Christ saves us through faith based on the merits of His finished work of redemption alone (Romans 3:24-26) and not based on the merits of our works. (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9)